Will the military take up arms against Gülen supporters?

Lale Kemal
Lale Kemal


Date posted: May 6, 2015

In democracies citizens cannot be perceived as threats, and hence enemies.

If they are, one cannot talk about there being democracy in that state. In democratic states, the professional gendarmerie (paramilitary forces) and the police, being under the authority of the government in power, will ensure law and order. Acting upon orders from the judiciary, law enforcement authorities will fight against criminals and acts of crime such as corruption, money laundering, terrorism, etc. In these states, the military will be asked to interfere in internal unrest only if it reaches uncontrollable levels that the gendarmerie and police forces can’t cope with.

In modern states, again, elected governments will be the final authority to decide about external threat perceptions after compiling input from related institutions, including the military. The sole duty of the military in those states is to protect their nation against external threats. In democracies, special parliamentary commissions will add to the country’s version of the National Security Policy Paper, abbreviated MGSB in Turkish, in which the government has outlined its external threat perceptions. This policy paper will be open to the public, except for highly confidential parts that need to remain secret for the sake of maintaining national security.

The military in modern states will review their troop deployments and consider whether they will need to procure different types of arms than they currently possess to deter any possible external threats outlined in the national security policy paper.

Unlike in democracies, in Turkey, the MGSB, alternatively known as the “Red Book,” or the “Secret Constitution,” is kept highly secret and not shared with the public. This is despite the fact that Turkey is a member of NATO, which brings together nations that should attach the utmost importance to democratic values.
Moreover, unlike the traditional practices of modern states, Turkey’s MGSB also includes internal threat perceptions, citizens, religious groups or political parties that are perceived as threats, and therefore enemies.

Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) announced publicly in 2010 and afterwards that as an elected government it would put an end to the concept of internal threat perceptions, a remnant of military-led regimes, and that the MGSB would only address external threat perceptions.

In fact, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, in his capacity as prime minister at the time, was publicly saying that both reactionaryism and separatism were virtual threats, created by those (the military-led establishment) who wished to keep pressure on citizens and to maintain the status quo.

“We (the AKP rule) have eliminated that type of threat element from the MGSB,” he said.

Referring to the MGSB, Parliament Speaker Cemil Çiçek was saying in 2010 that “There can’t be a state that perceives its citizens as a threat.” Similarly, Bülent Arınç, deputy prime minister, in 2006 was, as then-parliament speaker, ruling out the existence of a “Secret Constitution,” in a democratic state. Yet since the disclosure of a high-profile corruption and bribery scandal in late 2013, the Turkish government declared its one-time ally, the community inspired by the US-based Islamic cleric, Fethullah Gülen, commonly known as the Hizmet movement, an enemy, blaming it for orchestrating the graft probe to unseat its rule in collaboration with what it said were international circles.

As part of a strategy of vengeance to finish off the Gülen movement while covering up the graft scandal, President Erdoğan and his AKP government have ensured that this movement will be categorized with the internal threat perceptions. This policy has also marked a big U-turn from the AKP government’s earlier statements mentioned above, in which it said that internal threat perceptions, the creation of the military-led establishment, would be eliminated from the MGSB.

Meanwhile, the government’s all-out war against the Gülen movement has widened in recent years, targeting all forms of dissent in the country, raising serious fears of the country’s drift toward authoritarianism.

Finally, Erdoğan and his government ensured at late last week’s National Security Council (MGK) meeting that the Gülen movement and Gülen himself will be included in the MGSB among the internal threat perceptions.

The MGK itself, staffed by five top military commanders alongside government ministers, runs contrary to the civilian democratic control of the armed forces, a basic principle in democratic nations. Based on the new MGSB, subject to Cabinet approval, the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) should now design its Turkish National Military Strategy Paper (TÜMAS) to reorganize its troop deployments, if necessary, and equip itself with arms to deter “internal,” in addition to external, enemies. At this stage, a critical question arises. Since the TSK will redesign its military strategies based on the new security policy paper, will it take up arms if necessary against Gülen supporters, since the Gülen movement is perceived as an internal threat/enemy?

Source: Today's Zaman , May 04, 2015


Related News

What is this bedlam all about?

So, as expected, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan declared all-out war. The enemy — what he and his advisers regard as “the junta formation within the police,” the media, the judiciary, the American Embassy, affiliates of the mainly volunteer Hizmet movement, and, well, whoever seems to disagree with the way he intends to run the country and whoever tends to believe there is no smoke without fire — have dug their trenches in a circle.

[Event of the Week] Gülen breaks his silence, responds to allegations

Having stayed largely silent in the face of relentless attacks amounting to hate speech by beleaguered Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who was incriminated in a massive corruption scandal, Fethullah Gülen spoke to Today’s Zaman and provided his account of how he sees the recent events in Turkey in his first interview with the Turkish media since Dec. 17.

Fethullah Gulen: Muslims, we have to critically review our understanding of Islam

Words fall short to truly express my deep sadness and revolt in the face of the carnage perpetrated by terrorist groups such as the so-called ISIS. I share a profound frustration with a billion and a half Muslims around the world at the fact that such groups commit terror while dressing up their perverted ideologies as religion.

Who stalls the reforms [in Turkey]?

ABDÜLHAMİT BİLİCİ “A group of people, including businessmen, students and teachers who came all the way from Thailand, traveling 9,000 kilometers to cast their votes in the referendum (on September 12, 2010), are now back to Thailand. Neşet Kahraman, who spent $2,000 on travel in order to cast his vote, said: ‘The referendum was pretty […]

Ugandan opinion leader refutes news report which defames Hizmet Movement

Speaking to the Cihan news agency, Dr. Anas Abdunoor Kaliisa said he did not give such a statement to Yeni Şafak and such a slander is not unacceptable. “They asked me some questions about Hizmet Movement. I stated that Turkish schools contribute a lot to education of Uganda.

Fethullah Gulen talking about Turkey’s failed coup: Responses to Philadelphia World Affairs Council

Right now, all critical voices are silenced in Turkey and only the voice of those in power is heard. Consequently both Turkish people and outside observers are misled. The misperception about the coup continues because there is only one voice. The government interprets everything according to their calculations. They are using this event to express the antipathy they already had against Hizmet movement. The coup attempt is serving to justify their plans to persecute Hizmet movement.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Fethullah Gulen’s Message on New Defamation Efforts by Erdogan Regime

Pro-Erdogan journalist says killing Gülen followers, even their babies, a religious obligation

Toward a culture of coexistence

Gülen’s Statement of Condemnation for Terrorist Attack Against the Coptic Christian Community in Egypt

Securitizing the Hizmet / Gulen movement

The Independent: Turkish men ‘face torture’ after being extradited from Malaysia as post-coup crackdown continues

34 housewives arrested over Gülen links in İstanbul

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News