Why is the government freeing bloody murderers?

Orhan Kemal Cengiz
Orhan Kemal Cengiz


Date posted: March 20, 2014

ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ

The government is continuing to act in panic. In the last couple of months, every single step it has taken has somehow been related to the graft probe, and they all are being taken to suffocate the corruption investigation.

Most of the Ergenekon suspects (the people who were behind bars for allegedly planning a military coup against the government) have been released. One of the prime suspects in the Hrant Dink murder is now free. Even murderers who were caught red-handed on the scene have been released from prison. But how and why has all of this happened?

The government has only one argument against the corruption charges. It is this: There is an illegal structure within the police and judiciary, and this has created the probe against the government. This graft probe is a new coup attempt against the government in the disguise of a corruption investigation.

No matter how concrete the allegations or how strong the evidence in the investigation file, the government is in complete denial.

And it has made quite an important strategic decision. To support their ineffective argument that all these files against them have been produced by a gang within the police and judiciary, they are freeing the Ergenekon suspects, who had originally produced this line of defense, namely that they had been made the victims of fabricated evidence brought against them by a “gang” in the police and judiciary.

Does all of this seem a bit confusing? It is not, actually. All I am saying is this: The government is freeing Ergenekon suspects willingly and on purpose to create an alliance against the so-called “parallel state,” as they call the movement inspired by Fethullah Gülen.

When the Constitutional Court decided that the total duration of pre-trial detention could not exceed five years, the government saw this as an opportunity to advance its case. When the Constitutional Court delivered this judgment, it also gave the government one year to make the necessary legal changes. And this time limit would have been reached in August. If the government had waited until August, probably no suspects in the Zirve Publishing House or Dink murders would have been released, because in that time the trials would have been completed, or at least the courts of first instance would have delivered their judgments. And, of course, when the government was introducing the new law, it was well aware that all these murderers would be freed. It did not care about the “side effects.” It focused on “the big picture.” It was in a hurry to release the Ergenekon suspects.

It believed the Ergenekon suspects would join it in its fight against the so-called “parallel state.” It thought all these Ergenekon suspects would talk quite loudly about the evils of the parallel state and would become supporters of its argument that there is a “structure” within the state that produces false evidence and has created false accusations first against soldiers and now against the government. And, in this way, the people would believe that there were no solid accusations or concrete evidence in the graft probe against the government.

If you ask me, the government’s strategy of “perception management” is childish, amateurish and doomed to backfire.

The government, once the most ardent supporter of the Ergenekon cases, had even denied the apparent shortcomings in these cases. Now it is in a diametrically opposite position, arguing that everything was wrong in these cases. It has even freed some suspects. No one in Turkey can honestly have any suspicion that the suspects did not do many terrible things in the past; they were at the center of coup attempts.

We will see whether these people play the role given to them by the government or start their old activities again, which had been stopped by these trials.

Source: Todays Zaman , March 20, 2014


Related News

Liberal Turkish Journalists Champion Freedom of Expression, to a Degree

It’s precisely opposition journalists who have been criticized by colleagues who until recently worked for the newspapers of U.S.-based Fethullah Gulen. These colleagues accuse the opposition journalists of betraying freedom of expression. One of them is Sevgi Akarcesme who was editor-in-chief of the Turkish English-language daily Today’s Zaman. There is a great deal of truth in Akarcesme’s claims. But who today would dare defend journalists identified with Gulen?

Bank Asya shares skyrocket after trading resumes

The Islamic bank has been in the spotlight since Turkish media reported that state-owned companies and institutional depositors loyal to Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan had withdrawn TL 4 billion ($1.8 billion), or some 20 percent of the bank’s total deposits, because the bank’s founders include sympathizers of cleric Fethullah Gülen, a former-ally-turned-critic of Erdoğan.

Arrested journalist: I am on guard duty for democracy

Samanyolu TV Group General Manager Hidayet Karaca, who has been under arrest since a government-backed police operation against independent media outlets on Dec. 14, 2014, stated in a letter on Monday that his imprisonment for the last 66 days without legal justification is a result of his being on guard duty for democracy.

Sacrificing a legend for a shoebox*

Just to prevent the graft probe…They [AK Party] declined the honor of ending the military tutelage system and also declared the procedures used to achieve this triumph to be “unlawful.” Since they sacrificed the most important victory of their eleven-year rule, we can easily say the following: My friends, this must be one hell of a shoebox!

The AKP as a party: Is it Islamic, statist or just opportunist?

The situation is tense these days in Turkey between the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Gülen movement.

Kimse Yok Mu head: Council of State confirms charity’s transparency

According to İsmail Cingöz, president of the charity Kimse Yok Mu, the Council of State’s unanimous annulment of a recent Cabinet decision to rescind the charity’s right to collect donations confirms its institutional transparency, accountability and reliability.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Friendship Dinner hosted by Pacific Dialogue Foundation in Philippines

An Armenian lady, Hrant and April 24

US law professor has no doubt Gulen trial in Turkey was political

‘Hiç Durmadan Hizmete Devam’: Turks Decry Erdogan Decision Via #HiçDurmadanHizmeteDevam

The Anatolians are coming

Pakistan: Parents oppose handing over school chain to Turkish NGO

Turkish school threatens students who refuse to write poems on coup attempt

Copyright 2023 Hizmet News