Abant Platform raises support for EU process, criticism for parties

Today's Zaman columnist Nicole Pope (C) speaks on the second day of the 28th Abant Platform meeting in the western province of Bolu. (Photo: Cihan, mrullah Bayrak)
Today's Zaman columnist Nicole Pope (C) speaks on the second day of the 28th Abant Platform meeting in the western province of Bolu. (Photo: Cihan, mrullah Bayrak)


Date posted: February 11, 2013

SEVGİ AKARÇEŞME, ABANT/BOLU

In the second day of discussions at the 28th Abant Platform meeting, participants leveled criticism at both Turkey and the EU while reiterating support for Turkey’s membership process at large.

It was agreed that although Turkey’s long-term interests lie in EU membership, both sides suffer from fatigue as Turkey’s disappointment leads to a decrease in its appetite for the EU.

Moderator of the session, titled “EU Negotiation Process and the Current Situation,” and Today’s Zaman columnist Nicole Pope said that Turkey is sending mixed signals to the EU through Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, while President Abdullah Gül supports the EU process. However, criticizing the rise of Islamophobia in Europe, Pope said Turkey is not always treated fairly by the EU. Referring to research by the Center for Economics and Foreign Policy Studies (EDAM) in January, Pope said that two-thirds of Turks are skeptical of the EU.

Pope underlined the shortcomings of Turkish democracy as she said, “Gay rights or the gender dimension are barely discussed in Turkey,” adding that in terms of representation of women in politics Turkey lags way behind Europe.

François Naucodie from the Turkey delegation of the EU said that the EU has not collapsed, as he reminded all of the latest approval of the 2014-2020 EU budget of the EU while adding that the bloc is a successful peace project.

Drawing attention to the importance of cultural exchange between the EU and Turkey, Naucodie said despite the economic crisis, the share of Europe in Turkey’s trade is 38 percent while 80 percent of the foreign direct investment in Turkey in the first half of 2012 was from Europe. He underlined that admission is a “work in progress.”

Similarly, Shemeikka Pekka from the Embassy of Finland said, “The EU will come back stronger.” He stated that the relations between Turkey and the EU are clearly a win-win situation.

“The burden is on the shoulders of the intellectuals to tell the people that the EU is not about money,” Dr. İhsan Yılmaz from Fatih University said while speaking at the meeting. However, he noted that there is “EU fatigue” not only among politicians, but also among intellectuals in Turkey.

In a critical remark, Dr. Gökhan Bacık from Zirve University said that Turkish actors are no longer interested in the EU process with the exception of President Gül. In strong criticism of Europe, he added that the visa process of some EU countries has “semi-racist elements.”

According to Dr. Savaş Genç from Fatih University, however, it is not only the government, but also opposition parties in Turkey that have no interest in the EU. He equally criticized European political parties for opposing Turkey’s membership. Denying that all parties are against Turkey, Today’s Zaman columnist Joost Lagendijk said that it is “a couple of big countries that are against Turkey” as he expressed his optimism in the long run.

Professor Hans Köchler, the president of the International Progress Organization (IPO), said Turkey needs to be present in Europe, but its membership has become an issue of populist policies. He also argued that social democrats in Europe are not really in favor of Turkey’s membership due to the concerns of trade unions over competition.

Klaus Wölfer, the Austrian ambassador to Turkey, stated that his own country also waited at the gates of Europe for a long time as he directed attention to the size of Turkey.

Criticizing European politicians and the media, Dr. Uğur Kömeçoğlu from Süleyman Şah University said, “The center-right parties are failing as far as Turkey’s membership is concerned.” When a politician like Angela Merkel says that multiculturalism has failed in Germany, it can have repercussions, he added.

Professor Bekir Karlığa, chairman of the National Coordination Committee of the UN Alliance of Civilizations and the founding president of the Civilization Studies Center, said that the EU began to follow the “wrong route” in 2005. Referring to the Prime Minister Erdoğan’s remarks on the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), he stated that the prime minister does not mean to reject the EU, but he has a desire to force the EU to make a decision on Turkey.

“If you only care about wealth, the West is not the only example, but if you also care about democracy, the West is still the only option,” writer Mustafa Akyol said in reference to the values represented by the EU.

Cemal Uşşak from the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) remarked that the public opinion is directed towards a false expectation that there is an alternative to the EU.

Kurdish intellectual Ümit Fırat said that Kurds as a group provided the greatest support to the EU because the EU means the democratization of Turkey. Joining others in the criticism of the visa procedures of the European countries, Fırat said that he feels humiliated whenever he applies for a Schengen visa.

The meeting is expected to continue until Sunday afternoon with panels on Turkey’s new constitution and a debate on inclusive democracy.

Source: Today’s Zaman 9 February 2013

 


Related News

Alevi leader Kenanoğlu: Discrimination against Alevis increased in 2013

It must be realized that religion is a matter for individual citizens. It is likely that the Gülen community will face restrictions and pressure from the government [as the AK Party government’s supporters have accused the Gülen movement of discrediting a number of ministers and their relatives in relation to a recent investigation into alleged bribery in public tenders, which saw the sons of three Cabinet ministers taken into custody alongside construction moguls and bureaucrats]. What we have been defending are universal rights, including the freedom of religion and belief. If these can be achieved, everybody will benefit from them, not just the Alevi community.

Abant tackles contentious issue of drafting new constitution

9 March 2012 / TODAY’S ZAMAN, İSTANBUL As this year’s Abant Platform tackles the pressing issue of shaping Turkey’s new constitution, a wide spectrum of intellectuals, lawyers, political leaders and journalists are discussing the problematic areas of, and proposing solutions to, the constitutional drafting process. “Deliberations should continue with the spirit of respecting each other’s […]

What do Alevis want?

Alevis have been traditionally considering themselves a minority because their interpretation of Islam differs from the state’s understanding. In such a climate, the Abant Platform organized [a Gulen Movement affiliated organization] a three-day-long meeting by Lake Abant over the weekend, bringing representatives from the Alevi and Sunni community. Personally, I learned a lot from the meeting which almost served as a channel for venting for Alevis.

Why couldn’t Bozdağ talk about the parallel structure?

Several parliamentarians attended the meeting with the Turkish minister in order to learn more about Erdoğan’s panacea “parallel state” theory and they insistently questioned Bozdağ about the Hizmet movement. Although he has etched his name in history as the minister who undermined the HSYK and halted the graft investigations at the speed of light, Bozdağ could only say a few sentences about the “treason, Hashashin-like activities, espionage, collaboration with external forces” of this parallel structure. Yet Europeans were eager to hear some explanation from an official.

EU and Turkey’s rights abuse

How did Turkey plunge into this mess of freedom suffocation, and what has really gone wrong with the once-admired President Erdogan ? While I keep pondering on these questions, I believe it is not too late for the Turkish government to retrace its steps and embrace full democratic norms.

EU report expresses concern about purge against Gülen movement

The progress report on Turkey that was issued on Wednesday by the European Commission expressed concern over the Turkish government’s purge against Gülen movement members, saying “any allegation of wrongdoing needs to be examined with due process, transparent procedures, and the right of every individual to a fair trial or equitable administrative process should be safeguarded.”

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

A Case for Why Gulen Would Never Support a Coup

Turkish Deputy PM says he will not visit Gülen amid ‘prep school tension’

Turkish Physicians heal Somali sufferers

Peace Islands Institute hosts iftar in NY

Prep school owners write to Constitutional Court

Woman, 5-month-old son under custody after visiting husband in prison

KYM volunteer doctors distribute Ramadan aid in Kenya

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News