Hüseyin Gülerce: I have to respond to Mr. Barlas


Date posted: August 6, 2013

HÜSEYİN GÜLERCE

I never thought that I would have to write an article to respond to Mehmet Barlas. We have an old friendship with him. After Zaman daily Editor-in-Chief Ekrem Dumanlı’s answer to Barlas in his column in Today’s Zaman on Monday, though, I need to clarify a few issues without engaging in polemics.

Describing Zaman newspaper as the mouthpiece of the [Gülen] Community is hurtful. I have been working at Zaman for 23 years. I served as a senior executive for five years at this newspaper. This is my sincere assertion: The media organization that has been labeled as the mouthpiece of the Community is one of the rare Turkish media organizations where freedom of thought and expression and freedom of conscience are fully exercised. No Turkish media organization welcomes different intellectual and religious opinions as Zaman does. I don’t try to throw stones at anybody, and I can sincerely say that Zaman is one of the few newspapers in Turkey where people can write without worrying about being punished.

Another issue: Calling the “hizmet” movement — what we define as the unity of devoted people with similar emotions and opinions — a religious community is a great injustice to these people. As the esteemed Fethullah Gülen Hocaefendi several times stated, they are not a religious community. Yes, they are performing deeds only for the sake of Allah and saying that the life is nothing without concentration on Allah and yes, they adopt the principle of competing with each others to do good and to fight against the evils that surround us. But this is a requirement of a human being. While doing these, they are trying to correctly understand and interpret the circumstances and the potential of both our country and the world. The aim is pleasing to Allah, but the goal is to integrate with the world by protecting our identity and embracing universal human values. If the “hizmet” movement were a religious community, how would they appeal to the hearts of the people across the world, create a link between them and build bridges of peace between different cultures? The “hizmet” movement is not a religious movement, it is a humanitarian movement. Actually, if this was not the case, the efforts of the Gülen Community would be limited with the Turkic and Islamic world. The best example of this is the Turkish Olympiads, which are organized with the attendance of students coming from 150 countries. Put your hand on your heart and tell us: Is this organization, which aims to make Turkish a world language and calls on people to establish a new world, a religious community activity or a civil society one?

The third matter is about George Soros. A Russian journalist interviewed Mr. Barlas a few weeks ago and part of this interview was published as follows:

“‘Can we describe Gülen as a Muslim Soros?’ I asked. ‘Yes, we can. It is a fitting description,’ replied Barlas, smiling.”

Mr. Barlas denied this exchange. He said the real exchange was as follows:

“Daria Aslamova, reporter from Komsomolskaya Pravda asked ‘Can we describe Fethullah Gülen as a Muslim Soros?’ And I said it was an interesting analogy.”

In other words, Mr. Barlas says, “I didn’t say it, but the Russian reporter did.” But this is exactly what saddens me. I would expect him to retort in this way:

“No, I don’t agree with you. Such an analogy would be unfair. Mr. Gülen’s beneficial and dialogue-oriented services do not nurture any political motives.”

Indeed, many people accuse US financial speculator Soros of leveraging his financial power to manipulate domestic and political matters of countries. Apparently, with her Soros analogy, the Russian reporter is trying to add fuel to the campaign that seeks to create a distorted image of Gülen in Eurasia. I would expect a very clear objection from Mr. Barlas. Here, I must engage in self-recrimination. Despite our seemingly well-established dialogue with him, it appears we have been unable to express ourselves to Mr. Barlas. This is a failure on our part.

Source: Today's Zaman , August 6, 2013


Related News

‘Nigeria Moving Towards Peaceful, Happy Future’

Notwithstanding the series of conflicts in various parts of the country, there is a high hope that Nigeria is heading towards peace and a brighter future, Initiator of Hizmet Movement and foremost Turkey-based scholar, M. Fethullah Gulen, has declared. He disclosed this in a message to the Ufuk Dialogue’s 5th Dialogue and Peace Awards Ceremony, […]

Gülen ‘speechless’ on gov’t action plan against Hizmet movement

Islamic Scholar Fethullah Gülen has described himself as “speechless” and expressed his disappointment about a National Security Council (MGK) decision in 2004 signed by the government and recommending an action plan against Hizmet movement. A secret national security document recently discovered by the Taraf daily has revealed that Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AK […]

Ex-minister denies claims over helping ‘parallel structure’ while in office

Former Justice Minister Sadullah Ergin has denied allegations in a recent police report which claimed that he helped the so-called ‘parallel structure’ setting up its own cadre at the Justice Ministry during his term in office.

The story of the boy who cried wolf

The Sabah newspaper greeted the news of the 10-hour National Security Council (MGK) meeting with the headline “Parallel structure added to red book.” But this was, of course, a complete lie. For a long time now, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been indicating that the Hizmet movement — which he refers to as the “parallel structure” — would be officially added to the National Security Strategy Concept Paper as a “domestic threat.” This is a part of his personal vendetta and Erdoğan has kept up this propaganda war even as president of Turkey.

Erdoğan admits calling Habertürk executive to change reporting during Gezi protests

Erdoğan’s interference in a news channel’s reporting by instructing a top manager at the channel to immediately remove a news ticker, an act exposed by a voice recording, has been met with serious criticism from several political parties as well as society.

On the internal workings of the Gulen Movement

HAKAN YAVUZ* In general terms, the Gulen movement reflects a new understanding of Islam and modernity from within an Islam that is informed by Anatolian modern history and secular progress: This is a civil Islam that has successfully found fresh ways to inspire social activism through piety. It has modernized the humanistic treasures of Islam […]

Latest News

Exclusive: Turkey, Kosovo violated fundamental rights of expelled teachers, UN body says

Sacked policeman’s grim death sparks debate on COVID-19 data in Turkish prisons

Dissidents of the Turkish government are living in fear in Canada

Turkish Food Festival seeks to teach Greenville about Turkey’s culture and cuisine

Chestnut Retreat Center offers a look inside their Saylorsburg facility and its mission

Erdoğan’s overarching purge is not a road accident

Is Gulen the scapegoat of Ankara crisis?

Post-coup purge in Turkey leaves children parentless after mother and father are put behind bars

Turkey’s post-coup purge and persecution makes no exception for children

In Case You Missed It

Albanian president to Erdoğan: Turkish schools pose no threat

Turkey’s post-coup crackdown moves overseas

Woman gave birth while in detention, handcuffed to bed by police

Turkish businessmen’s helping hands reach out to Romanian flood victims

Philippine education minister invites Turks to open more schools in his country

Closing prep schools as a new form of official tyranny

Will Gülen movement become a political party?

Copyright 2020 Hizmet News