Toward a constitutional crisis [in Turkey]

İhsan Yılmaz
İhsan Yılmaz


Date posted: December 20, 2013

İHSAN YILMAZ

The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government has begun to dismiss all the police chiefs involved with the corruption probe.

The dismissals have also spread to other cities, such as Ankara and Izmir, and are expected to expand to 20 other provinces in the coming days. This shows that the AK Party is worried that several more investigations may be launched. The perception created is that the AK Party is replacing them with its most loyal police officers who will inform the government about any potential judicial investigation.

The police department is part of the Interior Ministry and the Interior Ministry has, of course, the legal right to rotate and replace police officers if there is a legal justification. The biggest problem here is that the one of the accused in the corruption investigation is the interior minister, who is at the top of this removal operation. Instead of resigning, he is dismissing numerous police officers who were involved in the judicial investigation. The government has been complaining that the police did not inform their superiors beforehand and as result the interior minister learned of his son’s detention from the media. What were they expecting? That they would inform the minister so that he could meddle with the investigation? This is not Norway, but even in Turkey, people laugh at this miserable reasoning of the government.

It must be underlined that these police officers were carrying out orders given to them by the İstanbul Chief Prosecutor’s Office. According to a recent law (Article 5 of the Criminal Enforcement Directive) that was enacted by the AK Party-led Parliament in 2005 in accordance with EU standards, these police officers are not obliged to give information to the interior minister or any other top officials aside from the prosecutors who are conducting the probe.

On the other hand, the two new prosecutors who have been hastily added to the case, most probably because of the government’s pressure, have now become de facto decisive actors in the investigation. The prosecutor who launched this case will not be able to make decisions without getting a signed document from one of these two new prosecutors. This speaks for itself and no further comment is needed.

In my most recent piece, I wrote that “the Erdoğan government’s initial reactions to the latest corruption investigation are not promising. It has indirectly interfered with the case The Erdoğan government may now be in panic. All that they have done so far only serves to create the image that they are trying to stop the investigation. Erdoğan does not seem to be in a mood to listen to anyone who thinks differently. This means that he will behave hastily and will continue to make mistakes. Yet, if he meddles with the judicial investigation too much, he may risk the democratic credentials of his government. A good strategy for him would be to ask his ministers who are under investigation to resign until the investigation is complete. Another good option is to call for early elections.”

As of today, all I can say is that my concerns have been confirmed and that the Erdoğan government continues to make mistakes, including indirectly interfering with the judiciary. Let me put it bluntly, this may pave the way for a very serious constitutional crisis in the country. Erdoğan and his advisers must see that controlling almost two-thirds of the media and almost silencing the remaining outlets with but a few, tiny exceptions, coupled with the inept opposition parties, created the Gezi incidents. I now risk being accused of being a conspirator, but will state my most serious concern here: If the government continues to give the impression that it is trying to stop the biggest-ever corruption investigation in the country, Gezi may repeat itself. It is clear that this may harm not only the AK Party, but also the Hizmet movement and Turkey. Only the AK Party can stop this from taking place by convincing people that it is not interfering with the judiciary and that it is fully against corruption. There are no signs of this taking place, but I hope that rationality and pragmatism will prevail over emotions and conspiracy theories in the AK Party.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 20, 2013


Related News

Retired public servant under custody for distributing donations to post-coup victims

M.S. was rounded up while he was withdrawing the money allegedly transferred from Canada-based Gulen followers to his account, at a bank branch in Izmir’s Bergama district. According to Turkey’s state-run Anadolu Agency, the funds were raised to support post-coup prisoners and those under investigation as well as the people dismissed as part of the government crackdown and their families.

2014: Towards an “Empire of Fear”

The judiciary package paved the way for the detention of all dissidents and the appropriation of their assets. Turkey became an “Empire of Fear” with the arrangements concerning MİT, internal security, reasonable suspicion and the criminal courts of peace.

Erdogan: Turkey’s man of mystery armed with extra powers

Erdogan’s Islamist supporters sometimes suggest that he is on his way to declaring himself caliph. As the 100th anniversary of the caliphate’s abolition approaches, he may find this tempting; depending on whether he uses the Islamic or Christian calendar, that could happen, respectively, on March 10, 2021 or March 4, 2024. You read it here first.

Fethullah Gulen and Gulen Movement Has No Political Agenda, Says Expert

Leading academics from various countries discussed the role of movements in the Muslim world and the experiences of the Gulen Movement at Arab League headquarters in Cairo. The conference, jointly held by Cairo University’s economic and political science faculty, Academic Studies and the Internet Foundation from Turkey, and Hira magazine.

Debating the constitution

Mümtazer Türköne, 12 March 2012 I attended the debates on a new constitution over the weekend. The environment that the Abant Platform offers is intense and rich. Opposite ideas and views meet there, and holders of these views debate matters. Communicating directly with those who hold different views, reacting to their views instantly and reviewing […]

Former US Ambassador Ricciardone: Hizmet members not terrorists

Former US Ambassador to Turkey Frank Ricciardone has said that the US government does not regard members of faith-based Hizmet movement as terrorists.

Latest News

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

After Reunion: A Quiet Transformation Within the Hizmet Movement

Erdogan’s Failed Crusade: The World Rejects His War on Hizmet

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

In Case You Missed It

Somalian Ambassador, “We Felt the Eid with Turkish Aids”

Pulitzer Prize equals five years in prison in Turkey

CHP Adana deputy lends support to mosque-cemevi project

For Turkish exiles in New Hampshire: No way back

‘Hizmet is really something that demonstrates what’s universal about Islam.’

Turkey-Kurdistan Regional Government ties: How and why did they improve this much?

Question in the aftermath of the Turkey coup – Who is Fethullah Gulen?

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News