Pulitzer Prize equals five years in prison in Turkey

Emre Uslu
Emre Uslu


Date posted: December 14, 2013

EMRE USLU

The statement in the headline belongs to Bülent Arınç, deputy prime minister and spokesperson for the Turkish government. Moreover, he is responsible for the government’s media policy.

For Western readers, I should clarify that he was not joking when he said, “A journalist might win the Pulitzer Prize for his reporting, but he should face the consequence of five years in prison.”

The worst part is that Arınç is known for his tolerance of the media and journalism. I cannot imagine what Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan would demand if a journalist published confidential documents. Perhaps 10 years in prison?

For those who have not followed the debate, here is a summary. Journalist Mehmet Baransu of the liberal Taraf daily published a controversial document from a 2004 National Security Council (MGK) meeting which contained an action plan for the government against the religious movement inspired by Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen.

As a follow-up story, Taraf also published confidential documents showing that the government had actually enacted the MGK’s recommendations. For instance, after the MGK meeting, the government began to store the personal information of individuals connected to the Gülen movement. Taraf also published documents showing that the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) still keeps files on individuals based on which community they belong to, which faith group they are associated with and so on.

Immediately after the documents’ publication in Taraf, Erdoğan slammed the report, accusing those responsible of “treason.”

Following the prime minister’s accusation, prosecutors began investigating Baransu and Taraf. The Prime Ministry, MİT and the MGK also filed separate criminal complaints. Baransu now faces a total of 47 years in prison.

This case will be a litmus test for Turkish democracy, for two reasons. Yes, of course it is illegal to publish MGK documents in the press. However, the Constitution prohibits governments and the state bureaucracy from developing plans to destroy law-abiding civil society groups. The Constitution also prohibits the government from keeping files of personal data on lawful groups or Turkish citizens.

The Taraf documents clearly show that the government undersigned a document advising criminal action against a civilian group. Because the Constitution prohibits the Turkish government from preparing or conducting such activities, the documents published by Taraf should be considered evidence of a crime committed by the government. Thus, their publication is not illegal. What is illegal, however, is the government’s signing such a document against the Gülen movement.

Moreover, in terms of journalism’s democratic standards, there should be no restrictions on the documents that can be published. And journalists should test the limits of what is publishable. The American and European media showed great examples of this in the WikiLeaks case, the Abu Ghraib prison case in Iraq and the latest National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping scandals.

The Turkish government, of course, knows all these examples. It was this government that improved the standards of Turkish democracy. But since 2007, unfortunately, Turkey is returning to its old position in which democratic rules are not in effect.

Arınç’s unfortunate statement is just one sign of the direction in which Turkey is heading. This is what he said: “Leaking the story may be described as ‘successful journalism’ by some, but this does not mean it is not a crime. It is a crime to publish confidential documents from the MGK. The title ‘journalist’ does not give one the privilege of exemption from what’s written in the law. Someone who makes himself or herself a candidate for the Pulitzer Prize for successful journalism should understand that they could face five years in prison because of the law and should do the job accordingly with courage. Nobody has the right to complain,” said Arınç in a speech in Parliament.

“If you say: ‘I did it by choice. I am aware of the consequences. This is journalism,’ you have to stand and face the consequences of the law. If you say, ‘I have done this for my country, and I will face all charges,’ then you will do such things,” Arınç added.

At the end of his remarks, Arınç said: “I am not threatening the journalist. I am just saying what is written in the law. They will not be afraid of my threats. I am a lawyer.”

If this is not a threat, then what is? Western democracies and the European Union should pay attention to this poisonous mentality against the free press in Turkey and do whatever they can to accept Turkey into the EU. Otherwise Turkish citizens will have to pay the price for “Turkish-style democracy.”

Source: Today's Zaman , December 14, 2013


Related News

Turkey’s business world weary of gov’t pressure, says Kalkavan

The businessman Kalkavan said that the government’s way of dealing with the corruption allegations has been “incomprehensible,” and that he had difficulty explaining to his foreign associates about recent purges of hundreds of police officers and dozens of investigators.

Conceptual contradictions when it comes to rhetoric about ‘parallel state’

.In the wake of the Dec. 17 corruption operations that took place in Turkey, the government removed and changed such an extraordinarily high number of people from their positions in the police force, the justice system and the national education structure that these changes certainly would not have been possible in a state of law. An attempt was made to see these changes happen within the framework of heavy propaganda about the concept of the existence of a “parallel state.”

How does the Hizmet movement fare with democracy?

Ruling elites of this country, unfortunately, have targeted different groups at different times. Thus, religious people, Kurds, Alevis, nationalists (ülkücüs), leftists, non-Muslim minorities and democratic intellectuals have been in the bull’s eye for attacks from these elites. The Hizmet movement has always been a member of this list of plagued groups.

Gülen Community and Gülen’s Reminder

Hadi Uluengin, April 13, 2011 Last week in this column I wrote that large masses whose common denominator is to adopt Fethullah Gülen’s spiritual leadership cannot be referred to as a ‘cemaat’ or religious community or brotherhood. I made this claim because the Gülen Movement’s (aka Hizmet movement) pluralism in quantity and diversity in quality […]

‘We see in Mr. Gulen a man teaching God’s words’

As an educator I may be a bit biased, but I think the focus on education that we see in Hizmet, that we see in Gulen and his teachings and his being, that focus on education which is critical to the work of Hizmet is itself the most critical work that can be done in this age.

Courts order corrections to gov’t media stories on Hizmet

Several courts have ruled against untruthful stories published or broadcast by media institutions close to the government about the Hizmet movement, which Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has accused of trying to undermine his government, but most newspapers and stations have not published the corrections as they should according to the rulings.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

The Failed Military Coup In Turkey & The Mass Purges: A Civil Society Perspective

Fethullah Gülen’s Condemnation of the New Year’s Eve Terrorist Attack in Istanbul Nightclub

Future of political islam: lessons from Turkey, Egypt

Columnist sees Gülen ‘conspiracy’ in ruling against Israel

Former deputy Uras: Erdoğan struck deal with Ergenekon against Gülen movement

Turkish PM calls for boycott of Gülen movement’s schools

‘Building Bridges Through Education’ explores education’s role in a globalized society

Copyright 2023 Hizmet News