Criticism and risks


Date posted: December 9, 2013

ALİ BULAÇ

A group of people who have lost their way in the woods is fumbling to find a way out.

It is impossible to make progress due to dense bushes and branches, so they use saws to cut down trees to make a passage. By doing so, they hope to get out of the woods. However, the direction they are heading in is leading them to a cliff. If they cut down the last tree between them and the cliff, they will fall over the edge. Someone who can see them with a bird’s eye view should shout to them: “Stop! You are on the wrong path!”

Social life is like this analogy. Sometimes we find ourselves in a forest, surrounded by nice-looking trees. Sometimes we can’t see the forest for the trees. Some people who are capable of looking at our situation from a different angle should guide us. This angle should be characterized by historical depth, a holistic perspective, spiritual/moral aspects, the ability to predict the future, etc. A closer look at the mission historically undertaken by prophets reveals that they just tried to guide people and caution them against inevitable spiritual risks and dangers.

Sometimes, political currents run in the reverse direction to social currents. Sometimes, some currents flow in one direction on the surface while other deep currents run in the reverse direction. Observers with discernment must draw attention to invisible currents. Not only rulers, but also societies must be warned. Sometimes, the majority’s choices, ideas and conventions fail to save us. Then, we must be able to say, as the great poet Necip Fazıl Kısakürek once said, “O crowds, this road leads nowhere.” The conscience of Islam is above all governments.

For understandable reasons, governments don’t like to be criticized. But all governments tend to make mistakes. Even if governments and administrations do not like to be criticized, criticizing their mistakes is both a right and a responsibility. It is a moral duty. The criteria for this criticism include fairness, constructiveness and the avoidance of libel and defamation. Damaging the prestige of people, groups, organizations or firms is not criticism.

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of modern times is providing legal protection for criticism and freedom of expression and legitimizing opposition. Umberto Eco argues that the Western system owes its durability to open and free criticism and the protection afforded to criticism. Nevertheless, criticism by its nature is unforgiving, even if it is constructive and well-meaning. In particular, if some vocal mainstream media groups are telling you that everything is okay, then anyone who argues that you are “cutting the trees in the wrong direction” will sound unsympathetic to you. You might easily rush to accuse that person of treason and ill-intention.

Even if it is protected by laws, criticism is risky and costly. If those who control have the power do not nurture any doubt of the integrity of their acts and if those who build walls around them can find profound wisdom and absolute accuracy and benefits in these acts, then your criticism will be perceived as ill-intentioned. If they cannot harm you directly, then they will not hesitate to harm your relatives or friends. For instance, they forget the fact that it is God who provides sustenance to everyone and try to deprive them of their jobs. This is perhaps the most merciless form of punishment.

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn said: “A great writer is, so to speak, a second government in his country. And for that reason no regime has ever loved great writers, only minor ones.” Those who see themselves as fit only for minor missions cannot leave deep marks in history. Just as the courts are not the property of judges, these judges will also become obsolete with the ruling parties they favor. Famed for being a just ruler, Umar ibn al-Khattab would urge people to criticize his decisions and deeds, saying, “You are wrong if you fail to criticize me and I am wrong if I fail to listen to your criticisms.” To ask for that which is beneficial is a great virtue!

Source: Today's Zaman , December 9, 2013


Related News

Abrupt gov’t decision to revoke status of Kimse Yok Mu draws criticism

Turkey’s leading charity, Kimse Yok Mu (Is Anybody There), had its right to collect charitable donations abruptly rescinded on Tuesday, in what seems to be an arbitrary decision made during a Cabinet meeting, prompting harsh reactions from volunteers, lawmakers of the opposition parties and representatives of other civil society groups.

Gülen’s lawyer: a civilian structure demonized by fictitious slurs

Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer of Muslim scholar Fethullah Gülen, rejected the Sabah daily’s headline story on Monday titled “Parallel Council,” saying pro-government outlets aim to distract attention from anti-government corruption assertions by making false claims about the Hizmet movement.

Police raid schools in Diyarbakır where locals go on strike in protest of recent gov’t practices

Police officers and inspectors carried out raids on a number of schools inspired by the faith-based Gülen movement as part of a government-led operation against the movement in southeastern province of Diyarbakır, where people have gone on strike in protest of the government’s recent practices in the province.

Islam-state-society relationship: the Turkish model

Dr. Husnul Amin* Countries like Tunisia and Egypt and their respective Islamist movements have positively revised their strategies taking inspiration from the Turkish model of society and statecraft in which both modern trends and Islamic values can coexist in the context of a pluralist society. While walking in the streets and bazaars of Istanbul, my […]

Government circular bans Gülen followers from collecting sacrificed animal skins

A recent government circular sent to police departments across Turkey told police to seize the skins of sacrificed animals during Eid al-Adha collected on behalf of the “Fethullah Gülen terrorist organization” (FETÖ) — a derogatory term President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his political associates developed in order to disparage the faith-based Gülen movement, which is […]

No secularism or democracy without religious freedom

The gentleman gently said: “However, dear Mr. Alpay, it was clear from the beginning that the AKP had a hidden agenda. But pundits like yourself conveyed a highly positive picture of the AKP government both at home and abroad. You have a responsibility in the situation we find ourselves today.”

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Why Gulen-sympathizers with their babies risk death to flee Erdogan regime

Pak-Turk schools hold graduates moot

Gülen’s education model discussed at Indonesia conference

Is Gulen the scapegoat of Ankara crisis?

Friendship Dinner hosted by Pacific Dialogue Foundation in Philippines

Yeni Asya editor: Erdoğan kept strategy to finish off Gülen movement secret

Henri Barkey: Why Is Turkey Accusing Me of Plotting a Coup?

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News