[Hizmet’s] Prep schools and civilized debate

Markar ESAYAN
Markar ESAYAN


Date posted: December 1, 2013

Markar Esayan

The prep-school debate has recently revisited Turkey’s agenda after periodically ebbing and flowing since the 1980s. The prep-school sector, which is the product of the huge problems in the country’s education system and students’ having to pass a challenging centralized examination before attending university, has grown out of proportion and presents us with a system that needs to be regulated. For some time, the government has been mulling its plan to transform the prep schools. However, when Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan said that they would shut down the prep schools, tensions skyrocketed.

The Hizmet movement, inspired by well-respect Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, led the band of opponents to the government’s transformation plan. This is unsurprising, as the Hizmet movement controls several media organizations and owns about 25 percent of the prep schools in Turkey. As its name implies (“hizmet” means “service” in Turkish), the Hizmet movement basically focuses on providing humanitarian services. And prep schools provide this community good opportunities to get involved with society. These factors led the spotlight to turn on the Hizmet movement as the government’s opponent in this debate.

I recently wrote that before moving on to discuss this issue, principles for the debate should be set, and that compliance with these principles would allow us to have a reasonable discussion, without harming any side. However, on the day that article of mine was published, the Taraf daily published a document dated 2004 that shifted the debate entirely outside the sphere of education. The daily continues to publish new documents.

The claim is that the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) made a deal with the generals during a meeting of the National Security Council (MGK) — an institution initially established after a coup d’état — in 2004 to “finish off” the Hizmet movement. The daily further suggests that the government’s recent plan to close the prep schools was part of this deal.

This news story was critical enough to overshadow the Hizmet movement’s well-justified objections to the government’s prep-school plan and give the debate a predominantly political/ideological aspect.

And this was what happened. Now, the prep-school issue is being debated not as a problem of education, but as a row between the government and the Hizmet movement. This is not good for the government or the Hizmet movement.

The Taraf daily’s claims should appear unreasonable to any person who has lived in Turkey for the last 10 years and followed the agenda during this time. It would be a mistake to explain the recent tension between the ruling AK Party and the Hizmet movement in the context of a period when the government was fighting a life-or-death struggle against subversive generals.

The document published by the Taraf daily was a routine tutelage activity and the government had to sign it because of pressure from the generals, who were plotting to overthrow the AK Party after it came to office in the wake of the coup of Feb. 28, 1997. The measures outlined in the document were not implemented, and the Hizmet movement has enjoyed its most comfortable time during the rule of the AK Party. The generals who signed that document are now in jail on charges of attempting to overthrow the government.

Then-Foreign Minister Abdullah Gül, who signed the document, had told Turkey’s missions abroad not to hinder the activities of the Hizmet movement or those of other religious communities. In the same period, the national security courses that portrayed the Hizmet movement as a threat to the state were abolished and all circulars and orders against religious communities — which were issued during the coup of Feb. 28 — were canceled.

If the Hizmet movement believes that the government’s plan for the prep schools is an ideologically motivated threat to its existence; and if it is, therefore, concerned, then the government must relieve the worries of this community. Otherwise, unfounded claims that would pit the Hizmet movement and the government against each other may evolve into a vicious confrontation.

I hope this crisis finds its proper course and is overcome.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 1, 2013


Related News

Kurdish paper Rudaw’s interview with Fethullah Gulen

The Gülen movement’s stance toward the Kurdish issue has become ever more questioned since the Turkish government’s recent targeting of the Hizmet movement. A close analysis, however, suggests a complex picture.

‘Well, you were saying Hizmet is a religious movement?’

The Hizmet movement is considered a civil society organization, an indispensable element in democratic societies. In democracies, elections truly matter. The will of voters is indisputably important. However, there is also another power, called public opinion. They influence the parties and administrations.

CHP leader: PM saving himself by paralyzing constitutional order

The CHP leader said there is a “parallel state” in Turkey, but this parallel state is not the Hizmet movement, a faith-based group inspired by Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, or any other religious group, as alleged by the prime minister. The parallel state is one that comprises the prime minister, several ministers, their sons, bureaucrats and businessmen. “This is a parallel state established for corruption,”

Interview about Hizmet Movment at Maxwell School of Syracuse University

Tosca Bruno-Van Vijfeijken, Director of  Transnational NGO Initiative at Maxwell School of Syracuse University inteviewd Dr. Alp Aslandogan, President of the Alliance for Shared Values. This interview took place before Dr. Aslandogan’s lecture at Maxwell School on Hizmet Movement on September 22, 2015.

Cambodian education minister: I’m proud of Turkish school students

Hosting students from a Turkish high school who won a total of four medals in an international environmental project Olympiad called the “ASEAN+3 Junior Science Odyssey” (APT JSO) in his office, Cambodian Education Minister Hang Chuon Naron congratulated them, saying he is proud of the Turkish school students.

Turkey’s Brain Drain and the Disappearing Academic Freedom

Hasan was the luckiest because he was not in Turkey during the coup. He was studying abroad on July 15th and learned the coup through the Internet. He was supposed to go back to Turkey but he decided not to do so because of the news on the immense purging in mostly the government and some private institutions. Few days after the coup he learned that he was dismissed from his position at a state university.

Latest News

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

In Case You Missed It

The mother of all wars

Erdoğan, Hizmet, assassins

Is the Hizmet movement resisting normalization?

World-famous Hafiz Naina: Turkish Schools serve humanity

Local, foreign participants debate Turkish democracy at Abant platform

Tamsil: The inadvertent overspill of internalization

Understanding Fethullah Gülen (1)

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News