Abant Platform meeting launches with identity debates in Turkey

Journalists and Writers Foundation President Mustafa Yeşil (L), speaks in the opening session of the Abant meetings in western province of Bolu on Friday. (Photo: Cihan)
Journalists and Writers Foundation President Mustafa Yeşil (L), speaks in the opening session of the Abant meetings in western province of Bolu on Friday. (Photo: Cihan)


Date posted: February 9, 2013

SEVGİ AKARÇEŞME, ABANT/BOLU/TURKEY

The Abant Platform started its 28th meeting on Friday at Lake Abant with the participation of over a hundred intellectuals, academics, journalists and pundits from different ideological backgrounds to discuss the current issues in Turkey.

The first theme of the meeting was on Turkey’s issues of identity. Participants agreed that the misinterpretation of secularism and the nationalist ideology of the state pose a problem, and urged the state not to impose any form of identity but to establish an equal citizenship for all regardless of religious or ethnic background.

Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) President Mustafa Yeşil said in his opening speech that the most important feature of the Abant Platform since the day it was founded was its ability to bring differences together in Turkey. Defining the platform as a table of thought that could generate a “common view,” Yeşil added that the platform could constitute an example of the fact that diversity is richness as well. He also said that the days when they would have debates in the international arena are not far away.

In the first session, titled “Identities, Demands and New Citizenship,” participants evaluated the repressive interpretation of secularism in Turkey. Writer Mustafa Akyol said: “In Turkey secularism has been officially interpreted to rescue the society from dogmatic religious beliefs. The Constitutional Court in 1989 said that it is also the state’s duty to save people from dogmatic beliefs.” According to him, as a reaction, religious believers developed two approaches. One is the complete rejection of secularism while the other is a different interpretation of secularism, which has gradually become the mainstream political view in Turkey. He reminded all that Prime Minister Recep Tayyıp Erdoğan himself also advocated secularism in Egypt in the wake of the Arab Spring.

Markus Dressler from Fatih University said that there seems to be a strong continuation of secularism since “the idea that the state should control religion has not changed.” Larry White from TOBB University in Ankara pointed out that despite the broader interpretation of secularism in the US, this country is also not free of similar debates and that the status of atheism is being discussed there.

“We don’t have the capacity to persuade people of the virtues of secularism,” said Gökhan Bacık from Zirve University as he added that, from a Muslim perspective, when you say you are Muslim, it goes beyond nationality. He advocated the tolerance of ideas and the practice of different beliefs.

In response to the question “Who is Turkish?” Reiner Brömer from Fatih University said that it is not a religious question because “the reason 30,000 people died [in the fight against the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK)] was not relevant to religion.” He asked whether there is room in Turkey for different identities, religions or even family structures as he underlined that the problem is about citizenship rights.

Emphasizing the importance of creating a “participatory citizenship” in Turkey, Uğur Kömeçoğlu from Süleyman Şah University said that in the Turkish context, due to the authoritarian nature of the state, secularism always takes precedence over democracy. He argued that being a citizen was equal to being secular in Turkey. Repressive secularism only evolved into a more passive position in the 2000s, according to Kömeçoğlu, who urged the state to include the Kurdish, Alevi and Aramean identities in its idea of citizenship.

Nicole Pope, a columnist for Today’s Zaman, criticized the official ideology and said that “the citizen is mostly understood as the Sunni citizen in Turkey,” arguing that the religious aspect is also a part of the identity of who a Turk is.

Advising not overlooking the fact that Turkey has yet to become a complete democracy, Cemal Uşşak from the Abant Platform said: “We emphasize identities when they are oppressed. In Turkey, due to many years of emphasis on Turkishness, those who are not Turkish underlined their different identities.” Like other participants, he asked the state to protect all identities.

Drawing parallels between Turkey and Australia in terms of the multicultural nature of both societies, Broughton Robertson from the Australian Embassy defined a multicultural society as beneficial.

Criticizing the practice of secularism in Turkey and the existence of the Religious Affairs Directorate, Cafer Solgun from Yüzleşme Derneği said that a state that assumes all of its citizens are Sunni cannot be considered a democracy. Referring to the Dersim massacre of Alevis in 1938, he further criticized the “systematic assimilations” while adding that the rejection of requests put forth by Alevis is one of the areas where the official ideology has collapsed.

Kurdish intellectual Ümit Fırat also criticized the inappropriate policies of the state that led to further division in the country and said that as a result of defining Turkishness based on ethnicity, “now a Kurd first defines him or herself as non-Turkish” in reaction. Fırat also criticized the changing of original Kurdish names of villages to Turkish.

Participants agreed on the negative impact of nationalistic education policies, not only in Turkey but also in all nation-states, including Germany and France.

In the second session participants discussed Turkey’s foreign policy and regional role. While Turkey’s efforts to support the rightful demands of the Arab people in the region were appreciated, concern over deteriorating relations with the neighboring countries was raised.

Participants voiced their doubts about Turkey’s capabilities in terms of becoming a regional leader due to its limited material power. In this context, the importance of Turkey’s soft power was reiterated. Trade and investment were also cited as one of the main motivations for Turkey’s diversified foreign policy.

Turkey’s Kurdish issue was among the hot topics in the second session as participants argued that Turkey is not likely to become a regional power before it solves its Kurdish problem.

Source: Today’s Zaman 8 February 2013


Related News

GYV rejects claims that Hizmet movement dominates Turkey’s judiciary

The Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) has strongly criticized and denied news reports suggesting that the Hizmet movement, which is inspired by well-respected Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, dominates the judiciary and bureaucratic positions within the Turkish state, calling the claims groundless. The claims appeared at a time when prosecutors summed up their case in […]

Alevis demand equal citizenship, disappointed with the state

SEVGİ AKARÇEŞME, ABANT/TURKEY At the end of the three-day Abant Platform meeting on Alevi relations with Sunnis, one of the fragile fault lines of Turkish politics, Alevis raised their voices higher, demanding equal citizenship against the backdrop of several past and present disappointments with the state. The pursuit of the end of discrimination both at […]

Police raid successful Gülen-inspired schools, kindergarten in eastern Turkey

As one of the numerous raids against the schools affiliated with Gülen movement, popularly known as Hizmet Movement, two schools and a kindergarten were raided by police along with inspectors on Friday morning.

86-year-old man in 11th month of his arrest on coup charges

Ali Osman Karahan, an 86-year-old Turkish man with walking and speaking difficulties has been kept in an Isparta prison for almost 12 months over alleged links to Turkey’s Gülen group, which Turkish authorities accuse of being behind a failed coup attempt in July of last year.

The Failed Military Coup In Turkey & The Mass Purges: A Civil Society Perspective

Both Turkish society and the world celebrated the fact that an anti-democratic intervention in the government was prevented. Turkish government has every right to pursue plotters within the law. The actions of President Erdogan’s government in the immediate aftermath of the coup, however, constitute a mass purge rather than a proper investigation.

Dr. Soltes: Hizmet cares for Turkey and humanity

Antalya Intercultural Dialog Center (AKDIM) hosted a conference entitled “Implications of Global Rise of Democracy for Today from a Rumi Perspective” at Ramada Plaza Hotel, Antalya, Turkey. The keynote speakers were the US academic Dr. Ori Soltes and journalist-author Erkan Tufan Aytav.

Latest News

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

In Case You Missed It

Purges at Turkish Airlines continue after PM’s ‘witch hunt’ remarks

Erdogan vs the Gulen movement

Gülen: The Ambiguous Politics of Market Islam in Turkey and the World

Italian professor: Fethullah Gulen is a true lover of the Prophet

Kimse Yok Mu continues its assistance to Cambodia

Turkish police to plant Gülen’s books in ISIL cells, journalist claims

Kurdish problem, PKK, AKP, Hizmet movement

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News