The unwanted truth: the Muslim enemies of Islam

Prof. Gokhan Bacik
Prof. Gokhan Bacik


Date posted: February 4, 2013

GÖKHAN BACIK

Islamists (or Islamic groups) have to face a simple reality: There are radical religious Muslim groups around the globe with false interpretations of Islam. The threat of religious radicalism is not simply Western imperialist jargon devised to benefit self-serving Western strategies. It is a fact that various radical Islamic groups have paradoxically served to help bring various aggressive Western policies into being.

It is also a fact that radicalism among Muslims has its own ontological source other than the imperialist West.

Today, it is the broad Muslim community that is primarily threatened by radical Muslims. To repeat this for emphasis: The radical religious groups in the Muslim world are first and foremost a threat to the Muslim community. That tasks the broad Muslim community with a mission to denounce them. Reports from Mali reveal that pious Muslims are praying in mosques for French help against the approaching radical Muslim groups. This is at once a symbol and proof that religious radicalism is primarily a threat to Muslims.

Yet there are two strategic calculations that have many in the Islamic world ignoring the threat of radicalism. One of those strategic calculations is that there is no such thing as a threat to Muslims from Muslim radicalism. Even some prominent Islamists in Turkey do not accept that there is a threat from radicalism. The claim that this threat exists is seen as a Western exaggeration to legitimize Western interventionist policies. The other strategic calculation is that of those Islamists who do not want to accept that there are radicals with a false interpretation of Islam. I do not use “false” to rule against any philosophical position in a debate about the Islamic faith. Rather, I use it to discredit the view that violence and killing are practices acceptable to Islam.

Some other Islamists confirm the fact of the radical religious threat, but consider it incorrect to denounce the radicals strongly. This attitude is likely to harm the global image of Islam and Muslims. The reluctant denouncers of radicals prefer to hide this reality.

It is time for the strong rejection of radicalism by Muslims. Radicalism destroyed Afghanistan, it weakened Pakistan and it may destroy Syria. The broad Muslim community must acknowledge that there are some religious groups whose interpretations of Islam are false and unacceptable.

One might even point out that an inner bargain among Muslims, in the form of Muslims versus Muslims, is detectable. Though they are small in number, radicals are blatant, and therefore grab the attention of the global public easily and quickly. Meanwhile, certain states, notably Iran and Saudi Arabia, put into practice indecent policies, such as the chopping off of hands in public. This is extremely wrong. This is just a different example of the radicalism that grossly misinterprets Islam. Saudi and Iranian politicians should realize that they are not only chopping off the hands of poor people but also the hands of the global Islamic community of Muslims (ummah). Chopping off a man’s hands in public is a highly pornographic act. It is certainly not Islamic behavior. It is an act that directly harms Islam. These acts are outrageous and scandalous, and bring to Islam only serious damage. One cannot find a better way of harming the image of Islam than the sight of powerful Muslims chopping off the hands of powerless Muslims.

Noting the various examples of radicalism among Muslims, one can argue that Islam’s main problems are its Muslim enemies. Those Muslims who insist on unacceptable behavior and perpetuate it with violence are simply the Muslim enemies of Islam. Understandably, it is very difficult to challenge these enemies. Even so, Islamic groups have a special responsibility to challenge radical Muslims, and should be the first to do so. If secular groups were to be the first to move against them, that would only consolidate the formation of radical groups. Logically, religious groups are the only antidote to radicalism carried out in the name of religion. Secular or liberal groups do not have the properties needed for the antidote.

Source: Today’s Zaman February 3, 2013


Related News

Former Somali minister grateful to Kimse Yok Mu

Muallim Adem Adow, Somalia’s former naval minister and deputy, expressed his thanks to the international aid and relief foundation Kimse Yok Mu operating in his country. He said his people will always remember KYM which gave a hand at their most difficult times.

America’s first Islamic university starts academic journey

The first university to be founded by Muslims to teach Islamic studies in the United States has started its new academic year, promising to be a leading institution in educating future scholars, including imams.

Islamic scholars to discuss ‘Ijma’ at Istanbul symposium

OSMAN ÜNALAN, MUSTAFA KUŞEN, ORHAN YILDIRIM, ÖMER ÖZDEMİR, İSTANBUL Scholars from 80 countries will convene in İstanbul over the weekend for a two-day symposium during which they will exchange views about ijma, an Islamic term meaning religious consensus, and stress the unity of Muslims. The event, which is jointly organized by the Yeni Ümit and […]

It is not fair to tar 1.8 billion for actions of a few

We, the undersigned members of the Auburn Ministerial Association, wish to disassociate ourselves from the remarks made by the Rev. Rudy Tidwell about Islam and Muslims in the Sept. 20 edition of The Auburn-Opelika News for these reasons: Any religion that demands its members to pray five times a day and to fast for an […]

Fethullah Gulen’s message to the “Ijma” symposium

Fethullah Gulen sent a message to the symposium entitled “Ijma as a Common Roadmap and Collective Awareness” which took place on April 27-28 in Istanbul. Gulen’s message received a standing ovation in the hall that a large number of guests crowded into. In the message, read aloud at the symposium in presence of a large number […]

Tunisia was able to make constitution because of concessions of all parties

The Hizmet movement “revives civil society in a modern state,” he says, as he emphasizes that the movement also adheres to the values of the Muslim world. “Having Hizmet is very important for the Turkish state. It will help the state to renew its values,” the Tunisian politician comments.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Terrorism charges against Karaca do not make sense, CHP leader says

Meat Distribution during the Feast of Sacrifice

Chinese delight in Turkish Culture and Food Festival

Why Is A Cleric In The Poconos Accused Of Fomenting Turkey’s Coup Attempt?

Turkish charity announces cooperation with German counterpart

Who are these pro-Erdogan mobs who even beheaded a soldier?

Fethullah Gulen: ISIL Actions, Disgrace to Faith

Copyright 2023 Hizmet News