By Extraditing Anti-Erdogan Leader, Trump Would Betray American Values


Date posted: December 5, 2018

John Rossomando

Extraditing dissident Islamist cleric Fethullah Gulen to Turkey would be a betrayal of American values and should be permanently off the table. President Trump says that handing over Gulen to Turkey is not under consideration “at this point.” But that’s not good enough.

NBC News reported on November 15 that administration officials were considering Turkey’s request to extradite Gulen, who has lived in Pennsylvania since 1998. It cited two senior US officials who said that the Justice Department and FBI were asked to reopen Turkey’s extradition case against Gulen in October. Inquiries were made about his immigration status. This is reportedly aimed at placating Turkey by handing over Gulen in exchange for taking diplomatic heat off of Saudi Arabia in the wake of the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

Since that murder, Turkey has orchestrated a campaign of slow leaks and disclosures designed to keep the story in the news, and to expose Saudi lies about what happened.

Trump and Erdogan reportedly met privately for nearly an hour Saturday during the G-20 summit. It isn’t known whether the Gulen issue was discussed.

Turkish officials previously requested Gulen’s extradition after a 2016 attempted coup, which Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan baselessly blames on Gulen, who has gonefrom being an Erdogan ally to his scapegoat.

Turkey calls Gulen’s followers the “Fethullah Terrorist Organization,” and accuses them of trying to build a parallel state by allegedly infiltrating state institutions, particularly the military, police, and judiciary.

Freedom of thought and speech have vanished in Turkey. People have even been imprisoned for appearing in a documentary about Gulen. Turkish authorities accuse dissenters of being Gulenists regardless of whether they belong to the movement, dissidents told The Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT). Erdogan bragged in April that Turkish operatives had kidnapped 80 Gulenists and brought them back to Turkey. He also vowed to nab Gulen himself.

“You, who are in Pennsylvania, will also come,” Erdogan said of Gulen.

More than 82,000 people have been arrested since the failed coup, and more than 200,000 have been detained. Another 6,000 academics have been fired, 319 journalists have been arrested, and 189 independent media outlets have been shut down, according to TurkeyPurge.com. Independent media critical of the Erdogan regime no longer exists.

Gulen would face an uncertain fate if he were to be extradited. Amnesty International noted in January that Turkish prisoners face torture and beatings, and Erdogan would most certainly want to make an example of his rival. And if Turkey restores the death penalty for accused terrorists — which is how Erdogan describesGulen — handing him over could become a death sentence.

Extraditing Gulen would send a message that America no longer is a “beacon” of freedom and that President Trump is weak, Turkish dissidents purged by the Erdogan regime tell the IPT.

Abdullah Bozkurt, former editor of Today’s Zaman, one of Turkey’s largest newspapers before Turkish authorities shut it down in 2016, underscored his belief that handing over Gulen would be a sign of weakness.

President Reagan’s support for Soviet dissidents offers “a sharp contrast to what Trump is rumored to be contemplating. I thought Trump read Erdogan better than what Obama did, which was an appeasement,” said Bozkurt, who was purged by Erdogan in 2016. “It signals a weakness which Erdogan smells and wants to exploit for his own benefit.”

Bozkurt contrasts Trump’s approach to Gulen with the president’s approach to formerly imprisoned American pastor Andrew Brunson. In Brunson’s case, Trump imposed economic sanctions on Turkey to force it to let him go. In Gulen’s case, Bozkurt sees the administration as vacillating and less committed to the cause of human rights.

Extraditing Gulen would be a “point of no return” for America’s international reputation because it would send the message that other Turkish dissidents cannot rely on American principles, said Ahmet Yayla, a former Turkish National Police counter-terrorism official purged by Erdogan in 2015.

Like Erdogan, Gulen is an Islamist, but his ideology poses less of a threat to the US and the West than Erdogan’s totalitarianism and pro-terrorist policies. In contrast with other Islamists, for example, Gulen views the issue of women’s headscarves as a matter of personal choice. He also worries about Erdogan’s Turkey “providing haven to violent radicals and pushing its Kurdish citizens into desperation, would be a nightmare for Middle East security.”

This has already happened.

Turkish government officials ordered police not to intercept ISIS and Al Qaeda fighters crossing into Syria, Yayla said. “It would be a mistake to regard the AKP and Al Qaeda as enemies.”

Hacked emails leaked in 2016 disclosed that a company belonging to Erdogan’s son-in-law, Turkish Finance Minister Berat Albayrak, profited from the illicit sale of ISIS oil. Turkey’s intelligence agency, the MIT, provided assistance to ISIS and Al Qaeda in Syria, according to Kurdish sources. Charities linked to both terrorist groups operate openly in Turkey, according to Bozkurt’s Stockholm Center for Freedom.

Erdogan also publicly says that Hamas is not a terrorist group. “It is a resistance movement that defends the Palestinian homeland against an occupying power,” Erdogan wrote on his official Twitter account in May. Hamas leader Salah Arouri, listed as a specially designated terrorist by the US, operated from Turkish soil for several years until 2015. Hamas military representatives still work in Turkey. Israel’s Shin Bet found that Turkey also funds and helps equip Hamas using corporate intermediaries like SADAT International Defense Consulting, founded and chaired by key Erdogan adviser Brig. Gen. Adnan Tanriverdi.

Instead of looking to violate US human rights principles by potentially handing over Gulen, President Trump must take a hard line against Turkey’s rogue-state activities.

John Rossomando is a senior analyst at The Investigative Project on Terrorism.

 

Source: The Algemeiner , December 4, 2018


Related News

Kemalo-Islamists versus civil society and Hizmet

İHSAN YILMAZ When summarizing the recent Cabinet meeting to correspondents, the speaker of the Cabinet, Bülent Arınç, referred to a religious concept, “fitnah” (sedition). He was implying that the Hizmet movement was engaged in an illegitimate psychological media campaign against his government. He even a recited a hadith of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) on fitnah […]

Turkish police detain another woman shortly after caesarean delivery

A Turkish women, Nazlı N. Mert, who has just given birth to a baby in Ankara, was detained by police teams and transferred to police station with her newly-born baby on Saturday as part of post-coup witch hunt campaign targeting alleged members of the Gülen movement.

US Rep. Scott: Gülen movement cannot be designated as “terrorist organization”

Congressman David Scott, representing Georgia’s 13th congressional district, has said that Gülen movement cannot and should not be designated as a “terrorist organization” while expressing his concerns over President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s including the movement on the list of “Turkish terrorist organizations.”

Is there anybody there for Kimse Yok Mu?

Pink Floyd says the following in their song Comfortably Numb: “There is no pain you are receding. A distant ship, smoke on the horizon. You are only coming through in waves.” I think these words reveal what is going on in the “new Turkey” under the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government.

Turkish PM Erdoğan’s rhetoric and reality

One of the main problems that Turkish and foreign interlocutors of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan complain of is that he employs fiery rhetoric, with a special emphasis on drama, to score points with his home base of political Islamists, a narrow minority within his popular ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party).

Post-Kemalist Turkey and the Gülen Movement

The Gülen Movement was known for the cool-headed decisions it took at the risk of severe criticism during Turkey’s most difficult times. Today, it would be expected that the same movement will display a similar rationality in a changing Turkey.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Somalia agrees Turkey’s anti-Gülen crackdown, Kenya, Germany and Indonesia resist

Oil-rich Nigeria seeks Turkish energy, construction partnerships

Nigerian Federal Government ignores Turkey’s request to close Turkish schools

Dialogue and Friendship Dinner Unites Multi-Cultural, Faith Groups

EU, US Have Little Leverage as Turkish Democracy Backslides

Canada grants asylum to eight Gulenists under UN protection in Mongolia

Feb. 28 postmodern coup and sins of collaborative media

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News