Bank Asya seeks immediate return of ‘hijacked’ management rights

Deposit holders in front of a local branch of Bank Asya in Ordu protested the recent decision of BDDK on Thursday. (Photo: DHA)
Deposit holders in front of a local branch of Bank Asya in Ordu protested the recent decision of BDDK on Thursday. (Photo: DHA)


Date posted: February 6, 2015

ERGİN HAVA / ISTANBUL

Turkey’s largest Islamic lender, Bank Asya, is demanding that the state-run Savings Deposit Insurance Fund (TMSF) return the bank’s rights to control its management following strong indications that the fund’s decision on Tuesday to take over control of the lender’s board has no legal basis and is politically motivated.

Turkey’s banking watchdog, the Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BDDK), handed management control of 63 percent of the privileged shares of Bank Asya over to state savings funds on Tuesday, citing a lack of certain key documents as the reason why the bank cannot maintain its operations. The bank’s shareholders are currently preparing to provide the watchdog with the required documents and the bank has separately taken legal action to revoke Tuesday’s intervention, legal experts familiar with the issue told Today’s Zaman on Thursday.

Experts say the BDDK abused its power to engineer a botched legal pretext to intervene in Bank Asya, adding that the watchdog will have to revoke the illegally problematic decision sooner or later.

Based on this information, one anonymous source with knowledge on the issue said, “The authorities hijacked the bank of its right to control its own board. … President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been trying to find the best legal pretext to sink the bank [Bank Asya] for more than a year and this latest maneuver failed to comply with laws,” the source told Today’s Zaman.

Bank Asya’s management and shareholders denied the existence of transparency flaws on Wednesday. The bank said it will take legal action in response to Tuesday’s decision, which it called a government-orchestrated bid to sink the lender. Those legal steps started to be taken early on Wednesday and the shareholders are demanding that the BDDK immediately revoke its decision to take control of Bank Asya’s management.

The TMSF named a new nine-member management board to Bank Asya on Wednesday and the bank demands that this board step down in favor of the previous management.

Lawyer Nedim Irmak, who oversees the legal procedures of a number of Bank Asya shareholders, told Today’s Zaman on Thursday that they have already took the issue to court and are expecting the TMSF to drop its control over the board of Bank Asya soon. “What we are seeing is a temporary period of TMSF control over Bank Asya, and this will end once the required preparations are finalized,” Irmak stated.

Early on Wednesday, Twitter whistleblower @fuatavni_f claimed that the intervention in Bank Asya had no legal grounds. The Twitter user further claimed that Erdoğan participated in several meetings to engineer a plan to destroy Bank Asya. Irmak said Bank Asya shareholders sent a written warning to the court, filing a lawsuit separately against the BDDK and Capital Markets Board (SPK).

The BDDK asked Bank Asya to provide details about its majority stakeholders within a month, citing insufficient transparency to allow for proper regulation. The bank’s shareholders requested that the BDDK extend the allotted period so they could prepare the required documents, including the address, criminal records, balance sheets and certificates of property ownership belonging to themselves, their company — which is registered as a Bank Asya shareholder — subsidiaries, business partners and relatives.

“The law does not stipulate any time period for such documents to be filed with the BDDK. The watchdog offered very short notice to Bank Asya before all these documents can even be prepared. This contradicts the law,” Irmak told Today’s Zaman.

“Another legal problem with the BDDK’s intervention in Bank Asya is that the watchdog said 63 percent of majority bank shareholders failed to provide them [the required] documents; however, we have found out that this share was 58 percent. Did the BDDK mislead the public?” Irmak asked.

No legal grounds to intervene in Bank Asya

The BDDK does not have the legal authority to appoint a new board at any bank unless it makes sure all the majority shareholders are notified of the watchdog’s request for more documents. However, a number of shareholders say they did not even receive a note from the BDDK, lawyer Fikret Duran told Today’s Zaman over the phone on Thursday.

“You cannot allow a bank to commence banking operations without the documents that the BDDK alleges are missing in Turkey. … Bank Asya has been operating in Turkey since 1996 and received no such official notification as to its [alleged] lack of documents until this political pressure began last year,” Duran explained. Duran said under normal circumstances, the TMSF should leave the Bank Asya board within a week or so of the required documents being provided.

Observers argued on Wednesday that Turkey may be forced to pay sizeable compensation for the Bank Asya intervention in the future if an international court, such as the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), reverses the decision, as has been the case in the past, when Turkey was forced to pay a fine to Süzer Group for bankrupting Kentbank.

Following the domestic banking crisis of 2001, Kentbank was seized by the government and handed over to the BDDK. However, the owner of the bank appealed the decision with ECtHR, demanding that its operating rights be returned and that $4.13 billion be paid in compensation. The ECtHR ruled that the confiscation of the bank was unfair and gave the government and Kentbank six months to reach a compromise to resolve the issue. After some time, Süzer Group agreed, oddly enough, to withdraw from its $4.13 billion suit at the ECtHR, and ended its efforts to obtain a new banking license.

Lawyer Turgut Tavşanoğlu, who defended Süzer in court at time, told Today’s Zaman on Thursday that the banking watchdog’s intervention in Bank Asya has no legal basis. “It appears that the BDDK has gone beyond the limits to abuse its power. The watchdog apparently cites Law No. 8, Article 5, which regulates Turkey’s banking sector, for its takeover of the Bank Asya board. However, that article does not give the watchdog the authority to intervene in a bank over ambiguous reasons such as a lack of documents. We do not know exactly who these shareholders are or what they are lacking,” Tavşanoğlu asserted.

The intervention in Bank Asya comes on the heels of an alleged personal effort by Erdoğan to take down the bank through defamatory news about the bank in pro-government media and separate regulatory restrictions. On several occasions, Erdoğan has made defamatory remarks about the bank, accusing it of failing to manage its funds and even once claiming that the bank had gone bankrupt. With one of the best capital adequacy ratios in the sector, Bank Asya has rejected such assertions. Turkey considers it a crime to defame a bank in a way that may damage its prestige or cause a loss of confidence in it.

On Wednesday and Thursday, loyal Bank Asya customers flocked to branches across the country to support the Islamic lender with new deposits. Bank Asya had more than 1 million deposit-holding customers ahead of Tuesday’s intervention, and that figure is expected to have spiked.

Bank Asya’s capital adequacy ratio stood at 17.35 percent as of June 2014, one of the highest in the sector, and above the Turkish banking sector’s average of 16.3 percent. This figure surged to 18.32 percent on Wednesday, bank sources said, making the bank the strongest privately run lender in terms of capital adequacy ratio.


*Faruk Alan in İstanbul contributed to this report

Source: Today's Zaman , February 05, 2015


Related News

Hizmet movement and perceptions

We are going through a very critical period. We need the common sense and support of all the precious members of the Hizmet movement as we have never needed them before. We must protect our democratic gains. I pen this article as a person who closely sided with the Hizmet movement during the attacks of Ergenekon — a clandestine organization nested within the state trying to overthrow or manipulate the democratically elected government — and the deep state, and who backed its justified objections to the government’s plan to shut down the prep schools.

Now, speaking Turco-Tweetish is more challenging

Volunteers from the Hizmet movement are overseeing the campaign on Twitter to criticize the Turkish government by introducing followers to a trending topic with a new hashtag every day, and since the Hizmet movement has active members in more than 150 countries, their actions on Twitter have exploded.

Spy agency planning false-flag terror acts in crowded areas, whistleblower claims

A whistleblower who has a credible record of predicting police operations and government policies has made a surprising claim, arguing that the Turkish spy agency is planning to blow up crowded areas in order to frame the Gülen movement, a faith-based movement, as a terrorist organization.

Freedom House says security package undermines democracy in Turkey

US-based watchdog Freedom House has criticized Turkey’s controversial security package, which grants extensive powers to police officersand provincial governors, saying that the passing of the bill in Parliament is a move to undermine democracy in Turkey.

“1915” by Prof. Ihsan Yilmaz (1)

One can draw parallels with the Kurdish Question here. Similar to Armenian gangs’ massacres in Muslim villages, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has also been engaged in terrorism against civilians and has been bombing cities, shopping malls, mosques and schools. But we all agree that all of these do not justify a state repression of all Kurds or their forced relocation, etc.

Cancer patient arrested over Gülen links deteriorates to stage 4 in one month

Fatma Aşkın, a breast cancer patient who was arrested on Feb.14 in the southeastern Turkish province of Gaziantep due to her alleged links to the Gülen movement, has experienced a spread of the disease during her one-month stay in prison and has been diagnosed with stage 4 cancer.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Fuat Avni claims Gülen-inspired schools to be closed due to fabricated auditing standards

The Erdoğan-Gülen encounter and democracy

D.C.-based law firm gathers intel on U.S. residents for Turkey – WSJ

Interview: U.S. Judge Says Turkey’s Judiciary ‘Taken Over’ By Erdogan

Threats and fear used to intimidate business world

Ex-soccer player’s resignation a turning point for the AKP

Erdoğan’s allegations proven to be incorrect, contradictory over time

Copyright 2023 Hizmet News