How will prep school controversy influence elections [in Turkey]?

Prof. Mümtazer Türköne
Prof. Mümtazer Türköne


Date posted: December 7, 2013

MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE

The Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) is a well-respected civil society organization which represents the views of Fethullah Gülen. It has clarified Gülen’s views on the prep school controversy and the Taraf daily’s recent publications by making an official public statement recently. In the statement, it stresses its opposition to the government’s decision to shut down prep schools by referencing democracy and freedoms. It also made cautious and balanced remarks on the 2004 National Security Council (MGK) decisions published by the Taraf daily and the reports on profiling. But the most important part of this statement involved those who see a connection between the prep school controversy and the local elections to be held on March 30. The foundation implied in the statement that the Gülen movement would not support any specific candidates or political parties in the elections.

Gülen is a very important opinion leader in Turkey. He is not a politician but the leader of a social movement featuring religious motives. In addition to his followers, conservative people and groups also pay attention to his views and comments. Even those who are opposed to his worldview send their children to the schools set up by his followers because these schools provide very high quality education and training.

Those who have organic links with the Gülen movement are viewed as molecular leaders in their environment and large masses follow them as if they are compasses. In addition, new capital elites and intellectuals are mostly members in this movement in Turkey. In short, the movement has serious and visible influence over society. If the Gülen movement decides to employ this influence in the March 30 local elections, this may affect the overall results of the elections. The prep school discussion is being carried out pretty harshly. Members of the Gülen movement are extremely hurt by the insistence of the government to close down prep schools. If this turns into a decision not to support the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) in the elections, the results could become extremely different.

The AK Party is a political party whereas the Gülen movement is a civil society movement which establishes limited relations and ties with politics. It is obvious that this discussion and tension will work against the political party. But Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is increasing the tension rather than alleviating it. More recently, he started a polemic whereby he criticized Gülen in terms of allegiance to religious values; this indicates that the tension will continue. Erdoğan accused Gülen of not supporting the female students who were wearing headscarves in the Feb. 28 process; it seems that this will anger the Gülen movement. The way the prime minister interprets Gülen’s remarks is wrong from an Islamic perspective. But the remark itself is a polemical statement indicating that the prime minister is not seeking reconciliation.

So how will all these discussions be reflected on the election results? There is no precise answer that can be offered to this question today. Unless the prime minister develops a constructive discourse and attempts to win hearts again, the AK Party may lose votes. The prime minister is not only confronting the Gülen movement but also big capital circles as well. If the circles and groups he is confronting agree to work together to make sure that the AK Party loses the elections, the AK Party may experience a bitter election defeat. It is too soon to make a final assessment. After all the parties have announced their candidates, things will become clearer in mid-January when all the balances will emerge. Right now, the whole situation does not seem so bright for the AK Party.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 8, 2013


Related News

Government plans to unlawfully take over aid organization

The Justice and Development Party’s (AK Party) efforts to undermine the largest aid organization in Turkey, Kimse Yok Mu (Is Anybody There?) reached a new level with alleged preparations to dissolve the board of the organization and appoint a trustee instead, although no legal grounds exist for such a move.

Retired public servant under custody for distributing donations to post-coup victims

M.S. was rounded up while he was withdrawing the money allegedly transferred from Canada-based Gulen followers to his account, at a bank branch in Izmir’s Bergama district. According to Turkey’s state-run Anadolu Agency, the funds were raised to support post-coup prisoners and those under investigation as well as the people dismissed as part of the government crackdown and their families.

Even a village cannot be ruled this way

A simple question: by what standards is Turkey being ruled now? Constitution? Laws? Unfortunately, neither. We have a rule based on arbitrariness and bullying. How about democratic criteria? They were long shelved. Legal criteria?

‘If you are against us, you are the other’

Turkey has been witnessing a rigorous debate for the last couple of weeks over the ruling Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) vow to finish off the test prep schools, which are a source of both money and influence for its old ally, the Hizmet Movement led by the self-exiled leader, Fethullah Gülen. Like many controversies in Turkey, the issue of closing the courses and integrating them into Turkey’s poorly-established and -organized education system was not only about the prep schools, which was only the tip of the iceberg.

Erdogan plotted Turkey purge before coup, say Brussels spies

The European intelligence contradicts the Turkish government’s claim that exiled cleric Fethullah Gulen was behind the plot to overthrow the Turkish government. Ankara is seeking Mr Gulen’s extradition from the US. The huge wave of arrests was already previously prepared.

The system is the root cause of corruption

We have the perfect recipe for all kinds of corruption. The media has been silenced. It does not work as a watchdog, inspecting the government’s financial dealings. Parliament cannot inspect the government’s financial transactions. The Court of Accounts (Sayıştay) cannot inspect the government’s expenses. There are no internal mechanisms within the ruling party to make sure its leaders are accountable; there is only an infallible leader figure, and whatever he does, the party endorses it.

Latest News

Sacramento leaders gather for Iftar dinner in celebration of Ramadan

SEO Skill Suite: Tools for Keyword Research, Technical & Backlink Analysis

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

In Case You Missed It

Outcome of Dakar Conference on Hizmet Movement

India must understand Erdogan’s ideological motives for seeking extradition of Gülenists

Filipino ambassador hails Turkish schools

[Part 4] Gülen calls for respect of diversity in Turkey to end polarization

Bank Asya recovers from gov’t provocation

Fear and paranoia still stalk Turkey two months after the failed coup

Another AK Party deputy, Muhammed Çetin, resigns in protest

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News