The system is the root cause of corruption

Orhan Kemal Cengiz
Orhan Kemal Cengiz


Date posted: February 13, 2014

ORHAN KEMAL CENGİZ

The government has been doing everything in its power to silence the graft probe. However, Turkey is not a fascist or authoritarian regime. Whatever it does to divert attention, corruption is number one on the agenda in Turkey.

Every day something pops up on the Internet exhibiting evidence of corruption. Every day the leaders of the opposition are talking about the files prepared by the prosecutor.

However, there is a bloc — no matter what evidence or information is brought — who solemnly refuse to give credit to these allegations. Surprisingly, there are some democrats in this camp as well. The corruption-denying democrats have a few core arguments that they repeat again and again.

No matter how strong the substance of these allegations, they claim, these investigations have been prepared and launched by a certain group of people, namely police and prosecutors influenced by Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen. In this sense, this is a coup in the form of a judicial investigation. To support this argument, they say the timing of the investigations is quite meaningful. The prosecutors launched these probes just a few months before the elections to cause a huge blow to the government. They say they are defending “politics” against the judiciary and police, who are trying to wage a coup in the disguise of a corruption investigation.

When you present an investigation as a coup, of course, there is no need to discuss whether the allegations are well founded, whether there is strong and concrete evidence, whether the prosecutors and judicial authorities did their jobs properly and so on. These elements are not important for the government’s supporters and the handful democrats who sided with the government on this matter.

I am putting blind supporters of the government aside. However, I have a few words to say to those democrats who turn a blind eye to corruption allegations with the excuse of defending “politics” and democracy.

I think what they fail to see is this: In the current political atmosphere, and with the way Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been ruling the country, it is almost impossible that corruption will not happen.

We have the perfect recipe for all kinds of corruption. The media has been silenced. It does not work as a watchdog, inspecting the government’s financial dealings. Parliament cannot inspect the government’s financial transactions. The Court of Accounts (Sayıştay) cannot inspect the government’s expenses. There are no internal mechanisms within the ruling party to make sure its leaders are accountable; there is only an infallible leader figure, and whatever he does, the party endorses it. While there is this culture of zero accountability, the government has been signing many contracts for the construction of airports, bridges, roads and power stations worth billions of dollars every single day. Under these circumstances, corruption is almost impossible to avoid. When we talk about corruption, we are not talking about a few bad guys who are doing bad things; we are talking about a system which is based on a lack of freedom of media, transparency and accountability, all of which are indispensable values for any democratic system.

Therefore, I do not give any credit to this defensive argument that they are “defending politics,” which completely ignores the fact that the very construction of the political system in Turkey is the root cause of all the corruption and misconduct on the part of politicians.

What are we witnessing is not a few politicians and their relatives who became crooked, but a whole political system that provides fertile ground on which any kind of corruption can easily occur.

And when you turn a blind eye to the corruption allegations and the way the is government is stifling the corruption investigation, you are actually turning a blind eye to the killing of democracy and politics, no matter what arguments you raise.

Source: Todays Zaman , February 13, 2014


Related News

America’s Friends Get Arrested in Turkey’s Post-Coup Purges

Many of the Turkish officers that are the key counterparts for U.S. counterterrorism efforts have been arrested or purged after a failed coup earlier this month.

Coup Commission members: Now is similar to Feb. 28 coup period

Members of the parliamentary Coup and Memorandum Investigation Commission, set up to investigate past coups, have said a number of anti-democratic moves begun after the launch of a wide-reaching corruption investigation, including the removal of thousands of civil servants and discrimination against members of a faith-based group, have said the practices are similar to what occurred in the run-up to the Feb. 28, 1997 unarmed coup.

Turkish daily Taraf accused of ‘spying’ and ‘terror acts’ for publishing state document

Daily Taraf, which published a document from a 2004 National Security Council (MGK) meeting about a state action plan against the activities of Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen’s movement, has been charged with “spying” and “terrorism,” in an investigation launched by the Istanbul Public Prosecutor.

Mysterious visitors to holdings

Reports of certain visitors paying “unexpected” visits to various Turkish holdings and company headquarters are currently being spread in economy circles. As these guests are connected or close in some way or other to the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), their visits can hardly be perceived as routine. These influential people are not making their visits for a cup of coffee. They send a short and clear message to the chairman of the executive board or to the general director, asking them to make a statement criticizing the Hizmet movement.

Why did Turkey seize Bank Asya?

In September 2014, in an address to the Turkish Industry and Business Association, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan made the following statement: “No effort is underway to cause the bankruptcy of a bank. That bank is already bankrupt. They are carrying water by hand to keep it afloat.”

Turkey’s permanent state of crisis

However, Erdogan has a problem: Whereas Ataturk came to power as a military general, Erdogan has a democratic mandate to govern. Ataturk’s Turkey was rural and only 10 percent of the country was literate at the time, with most educated people supporting his agenda. Erdogan’s Turkey is 80 percent urban and nearly 100 percent literate, and many well-educated Turks oppose his agenda.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Fethullah Gulen Criticizes the Da Vinci Code

Azerbaijan’s Turkish Schools celebrates 20th anniversary

‘Lies run sprints, but the truth runs marathons’

Erdogan’s purges reach heart of Europe as Gulenists in Germany say they are being spied on

Kenya: Investigate Deportation of Turkish National

76 newborns stateless as Turkey denies passports over parents’ Gülen links

Deputy says AK Party tainted by corruption as he resigns

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News