Islamism is dead!

Prof. Mumtazer Turkone
Prof. Mumtazer Turkone


Date posted: January 9, 2014

MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE

Growing tension between the government and the Hizmet (Gülen) movement will have lasting impacts on Turkish Islamism. The conflict is taking place between two groups that are pretty close to each other.

The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) is a political party; for this reason, it views the Islamic references it relies on as political ideology. The Gülen movement, on the other hand, is a social movement that mobilizes religiosity and uses it as a source of energy. These two groups share the same state of emotional affairs and lifestyles. The Gülen movement is trying to protect itself from the repressive power within the state. The AK Party, on the other hand, seems determined to eliminate this movement and take it under its control by relying on the state apparatus. This is a fairly intricate situation for those who do not pay much attention to religious references.

For over three decades, the elimination of a secular order and the establishment of a state order based on religious rules has been the main axis of political discussions. The current situation shows that there is no solution or remedy other than secularism that can protect groups from each other. We have a situation that requires the reconsideration of all clichés. The disagreement is not between secular and religious groups, but it is taking place between religious circles. A religious and social movement that stays away from politics needs the principle of secularism in order to protect itself against attacks by a state that an Islamic ruling party controls. If the government remains distant vis-à-vis the different faiths and does not try to make its own strand acceptable by others, this disagreement would not emerge.

Years ago, I wrote about the discussions over secularism and said that secularism is a must to protect Muslims against Muslims. As a general rule, secular circles created secularism as a shield against the rise of conservative circles. But, on the contrary, during the terms of the AK Party, the sphere of freedoms of those circles bothered by religious pressure was expanded. In the end, the most destructive conflict erupted among the conservatives. Secularism is the only principle that would stop this fatal conflict for the AK Party administration. The most heated discussion last year focused on the fate of Islamism once it came to power. I argued that Islamism existed as a political opposition and that it would disappear once it came to power; I referred to the AK Party as a materialization of this argument. Islamism is now in power; it gave up on all political arguments and attributed a different source of legitimacy to the state. And like any other political administration, its image was undermined. Today, the disagreement between the AK Party and the Gülen movement is not an ideological disagreement between two religious groups. It is a power struggle where the movement is in defensive mode and the ruling party seeks to destroy its opponent. The AK Party consolidated its power by eliminating all of its opponents and rivals. In response to the resistance by the movement to protect its autonomy, it initiated a destructive attack when it attempted to shut down prep schools.

As a political party, the AK Party should have made moves to attract the votes of the members of the movement rather than eliminating it. On the other hand, it would have been sufficient for the movement, which has not been involved in politics so far, to be assured of the state. The AK Party started the war and, contrary to its political interests, it positioned itself against its voters.

The ongoing crisis shows that the disagreements between the religious groups can be resolved by impartiality of the state. In the meantime, Islamism proved to be a project that uses faith as a tool of power and that denies the rights of other religious interpretations; so it failed. In short, this discussion shows that Islamism is now dead.

Source: Todays Zaman , January 4, 2014


Related News

Crackdown in Turkey passes the point of no return

Turkey’s alliances with the US and EU are fraying badly. Above all, Mr Erdogan is moulding the country in his own image, with only a uniform message allowed. As one liberal intellectual puts it: “In the past you got arrested for what you said, but now you can be arrested for what you don’t say.”

Shutting down prep schools against free enterprise, analysts say

“It’s not possible to make out of this behavior befitting a government that defends a market economy,” Seyfettin Gürsel, director of Bahçeşehir University’s Center for Economic and Social Research, told Today’s Zaman. Opponents of the government’s plan have also noted that the prep schools are a consequence of the many inadequacies of Turkey’s education system, and said that prep schools help low-income students enter university.

Angela Merkel, Meeting With Erdogan in Turkey, Emphasizes Free Speech

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany emphasized the importance of freedom of opinion in talks with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey on Thursday, during a visit meant to help improve frayed ties between the two NATO allies.

CHP leader: PM saving himself by paralyzing constitutional order

The CHP leader said there is a “parallel state” in Turkey, but this parallel state is not the Hizmet movement, a faith-based group inspired by Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, or any other religious group, as alleged by the prime minister. The parallel state is one that comprises the prime minister, several ministers, their sons, bureaucrats and businessmen. “This is a parallel state established for corruption,”

At home and abroad, Erdogan shoots himself in the foot

On Wednesday, for instance, Erdoğan described members of the Hizmet movement, who are mostly inspired by Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, as an “opposing side” due to their opposition to the closure of prep schools. Erdoğan’s categorization sparked outrage, primarily because the movement has been known as staunch supporters of the government.

Unlawful accreditation ban against Today’s Zaman reporter ends

Today’s Zaman’s chief parliamentary reporter Ali Aslan Kılıç, who was denied access to the Parliament building in March after his entry card was revoked, received his new card on Wednesday after a court ruling in his favor.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Gülen says he supports broader press freedoms

Turkish charity sends aid supplies to Syrian refugees in Iraqi Kurdistan

Gülen withdraws libel complaint after housewife apologizes

Turkey fails to channel money into industry: TUSKON

TUSKON says systematic campaign of defamation under way

Enes Kanter Education Fund to award students with scholarship

Kimse Yok Mu extends help to thousands in Palestine

Copyright 2024 Hizmet News