The Armenian issue of 1915, Turkish politics and Israel

İhsan Yılmaz
İhsan Yılmaz


Date posted: April 23, 2013

I am in Salzburg, Austria, for a week as an Erasmus visiting professor. I am mainly contributing to the ongoing seminar classes of other professors who have asked me to talk about Turkey, Islam, democracy, human rights, Turkey’s EU membership process and the Hizmet movement. The students of the University of Salzburg are highly interested in these topics and they ask a lot of probing and challenging questions. It seems that they have been following Turkish domestic and international politics very closely and are concerned about the recent developments.

In every class, I have had a question on the Armenian issue of 1915. My answer was blunt. I said that the Young Turks had oppressed several sections of society with their nationalist homogenizing policies to create the perfect citizen, Homo LASTus — laicist, non-practicing Sunni Muslim Turks. For instance, in 1938, they used poison gas against thousands of innocent civilians, including children and women, in the caves of Dersim, for which Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has publicly and very clearly apologized in Parliament.

In the same vein, it is most probable that this Young Turkish mentality had allowed them to get rid of the over half-century-old Armenian question of establishing an independent state in the eastern provinces of Anatolia once and for all in 1915. They had used the terrible conditions of World War I and brutal attacks of some Armenian gangs on Muslim villagers as a pretext to ethnically cleanse Anatolia of non-Muslims. I told them that it is not clear if the Young Turks wanted all Armenians dead, but it was obvious that they did not and maybe could not take sufficient precautions to protect the migrating Armenians, who would very obviously have come under attack by Turkish and Kurdish gangs.

Turkey must at least come to terms with this terrible failure and issue an apology. These Armenians’ children must be invited back and given Turkish passports. Their confiscated properties must be returned. Even if they “sold” these properties before they left, their lands must be given back. One does not have to be a genius to know that under these terrible conditions, no one was able to sell their property for a proper price and, thus, practically speaking, their goods and properties were looted by certain Turks and Kurds. Though, at the same time, other Kurds and Turks were trying to save the lives of these Armenians by hiding them in their houses. At the end of the day, it is agonizing enough that a “millet” that lived in Anatolia for thousands of years and was protected by Islamic Seljuk and Ottoman rulers for hundreds of years became extinct because of the decisions of the secularist-nationalist Young Turks. Why should practicing Muslims defend their sins?

Other questions were on Turkish political developments. Students have asked me if Turkey could prove that former Islamists will not tend to be authoritarian after securing their political power by getting rid of the military establishment. We have also talked about the American green light to all military coups that took place in Turkey. I explained to them exaggeratingly that even the Turkish military generals’ underwear comes from the Pentagon and that without America’s permission, they could not fly a fighter jet. In its relations with Turkey, the American government has mainly been concerned about security issues and, unlike the EU, has never criticized the Ergenekon gangs, the terrible, anti-Islamic Feb. 28, 1997 coup and several other anti-democratic Kemalist moves in the country.

The students were also concerned about Erdoğan’s recent remarks on Zionism being a crime against humanity. It is quite obvious that very few people understand and interpret Zionism as Erdoğan does. In most people’s eyes, it is about creating a safe haven for Jews who have been oppressed for thousands of years by different Western peoples. Criticizing oppressive and brutal right-wing Israeli policies should not be confused with criticizing Zionism, since there are also many left-wing Zionists who harshly criticize Israeli policies and support an independent Palestinian state. Putting all of them in the same basket is neither just nor wise.

Source: TodaysZaman, 10 April 2013


Related News

“1915” by Prof. Ihsan Yilmaz (1)

One can draw parallels with the Kurdish Question here. Similar to Armenian gangs’ massacres in Muslim villages, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has also been engaged in terrorism against civilians and has been bombing cities, shopping malls, mosques and schools. But we all agree that all of these do not justify a state repression of all Kurds or their forced relocation, etc.

Fethullah Gulen — A view from Israel

A Muslim religious leader, Fethullah Gulen, is daily in the news, as Turkish president Erdogan accuses him of plotting the recent coup, We are so used to Muslim clerics being or being considered terrorists that we give the matter little thought. And yet, the recent crackdown in Turkey on Gulen’s movement should be of grave concern to anyone who cares about the Middle East, about Islam, and about religion.

Bediüzzaman on the Armenian issue

Question: Armenians are dhimmis. How can dhimmis be equal to Muslims? Answer: Let us not see ourselves in a magnifying mirror. We are to be blamed on this issue. We could not protect them as well as we should have; we failed to demonstrate the justice of Sharia. Because of the wrong practices of autocratic regime, we failed to protect their rights within the Sharia framework…

Does the Gülen (Hizmet) Movement Deny the Armenian Genocide?

We have certainly been scapegoated, and enduring an ongoing collective trauma, with no end in sight. The fact that the Turkish state could label innocent people guilty, and punish them for their association (even tangential) with the Gülen Movement, opened the majority of our eyes. If they could do this to us, it must be true that they did it to other minority groups (Kurds, Alevis) and certainly to the Armenians.

Explained the secret: Gulen gave it as a gift

“I always wear two watches on my both wrists. One of them is my watch and the other one is Gulen’s gift. When someone asks me about these watches I tell them that my watch shows Turkey’s time.”

“1915” by Prof. Ihsan Yilmaz (2)

İHSAN YILMAZ Retrospectively using the word “genocide” to describe what happened to Armenian Ottoman citizens in 1915 complicates the matter further and does not help Turks in facing their country’s history. A second major hurdle is the insistence in limiting the issue to legal discussions. The issue is much more complicated and, rather than thinking […]

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

More emphasis should be given to improving students’ functional skills

Jews should speak up for Hizmet

Mali education minister lauds teachers in nation’s Turkish schools

The Turkish invasion of Nigeria

Fethullah Gulen’s Message for International Day of Peace

Gülen-linked journalist association warns that movement’s support for gov’t can end

Kimse Yok Mu holds iftar dinner for Bosnian orphans

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News