Who is the winner?

Prof. Mümtazer Türköne
Prof. Mümtazer Türköne


Date posted: December 24, 2013

MÜMTAZER TÜRKÖNE

A fierce war of words is under way between well-respected Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen and Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Gülen accuses the government of trying to cover up corruption while the prime minister accuses him of attempting to secretly take over the state apparatus.

They take each other’s words or phrases and use them as ammunition for their harsh attacks. This harsh dispute, along with an ongoing corruption investigation, is perceived as a war between the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and the Gülen or Hizmet movement (the community). Which one is losing? Which one is winning? Everyone wonders. Objectively speaking, I can say that the government has messed up while the community continues unscathed.

The Gülen community is a movement of volunteers. The real reason for the row is not the community’s attempt to meddle in politics. It is due to its sheer size and public image. As he did with other groups or communities, Erdoğan sought to take full control of the Hizmet movement in an effort to consolidate his power. Following the defeat of the military tutelage, the government saw a convergence of power. However, the Hizmet movement was not a piece of cake which it could swallow easily. The government had previously purged itself of many bureaucrats who are close to the community. The recent prep schools debate — which broke out after the government’s plan to close down prep schools was disclosed — aimed to catch the community unprepared so that they would surrender. This, however, turned out to be an extremely miscalculated move on the part of Erdoğan as he failed to predict that the pressures he exerted on the community would turn into an open war in such a short amount of time. This war is currently being waged publicly and the government does not have a chance of winning it. Erdoğan is beating a dead horse. But as his current overwhelming power has clouded his judgment, it will take some time before he realizes that he has lost this war.

Erdoğan is deprived of the firm ground on which he builds his charisma. He cannot take steps to tackle the corruption claims. Rather he obsessively continues to protect the implicated ministers. One week has passed since the graft investigation was launched but in the meantime, he hasn’t done anything to assure people that he will deal with the corrupt politicians in an uncompromising manner. His remarks indicate his failing reasoning. He just tries to give the impression that he won’t step back at all costs. But this time, he is confronted not by coup perpetrators who seek to partner with the political power or social events like the Gezi Park protests. The public impression is that the prime minister is using all his power, charisma and prestige in order to cover up the fraud. Moreover, he is doing this by desperately bickering with a religious community and not with the opposition or a pressure group. On the other hand, the community’s stance does not rely on any interest but represents a conscientious call.

Everyone knows the Gülen movement is not a political movement. In Turkey, civil society organizations, businesses and the media seek to get along with the government in an effort to ward off potential threats from the state. The community is a civil society organization (CSO) of volunteers that invests its energy in education. It relies heavily on support from small- or medium-sized enterprises. If it had been an organization which is seeking to take over the state, as the prime minister argues, it would have advised its qualified members to seek employment in public institutions rather than telling them to work in thousands of schools abroad. Furthermore, virtually none of the big corporations that are close to the community have any economic ties with the state. In short, the community’s approach to the government is not guided by its interests.

The war is over and the community has won this unbalanced war. As a matter of fact, no other outcome could be expected given the fact that the confrontation was between a political camp torn by tornadoes and clashes of interests and a community camp built on values of belief, loyalty and service. The AK Party is still in power and it will take some time before it can realize this bitter defeat when the reactions of the public become clearly apparent.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 24, 2013


Related News

Koza Altın latest victim of government silencing political dissent

Gold mining company Koza Altın A.Ş., the owner of Bugün daily and Kanal Türk TV station, had its activities halted on Tuesday in Çukuralan goldfield, one of the company’s five major gold mines, in a move that has been perceived as the most recent example of the government’s exploitation of inspections and red tape to put pressure on those with critical views.

Why the West ‘failed to understand’ Turkey

Erdoğan has exploited the presence of Gülen-inspired people in the state bureaucracy as a tool to silence all opposition and grasp yet more power. If the Gülen movement did not exist, the president would have needed to create another “enemy of the state” to fight against in order to reach his ultimate aim.

Islamic scholar Gülen’s family criticizes PM’s offensive language

Kemal Gülen addressed allegations about the scholar’s financial situation, explaining that Fethullah Gülen resides at a facility that belongs to a foundation and for which he pays rent, rejecting the claim that the scholar owns the property.

Taiwanese scholar: Hizmet movement bears similarities to Confucianism

Taipei, Dec. 6 (CNA) A social movement that promotes love, tolerance, dialogue and peace inspired by Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gulen bears many similarities to Confucianism, a Taiwanese scholar said Monday. Turkey is entering a period of reflection, just as ancient China during the period from 770-221 B.C., when Confucianism matured, and the Hizmet (service) […]

GYV lashes out at ‘traitor’ label for attending EU ambassadors meeting

The Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV), in a written statement, has denounced some media outlets’ labeling the body a “traitor” over its attendance at the traditional lunch meeting of the EU ambassadors. The statement criticized the allegations published in some media outlets which “in an effort to distort the truth and smear the foundation” said the GYV betrayed the country by attending such a meeting.

Gulen’s Outreach for Alevis

Zaman newspaper’s journalist Huseyin Gulerce’s words ‘ The government has been putting the Alevis off for seven years. This is a shame’  received support from the Alevis. Huseyin Gulerce, one of the leading figures of the Fethullah Gulen community (Gulen or Hizmet movement) and a journalist for the Zaman newspaper said that the AK Party […]

Latest News

This notable Pocono resident has been living here in exile since 1999

Logistics companies seized over Gülen links sold in fast-track auction

That is Why the Turkish Government could Pay 1 Billion Euros

ECtHR rules Bulgaria violated rights of Turkish journalist who was deported despite seeking asylum

Fethullah Gülen’s Message of Condolences in the Wake of the Western European Floods

Pregnant woman kept in prison for 4 months over Gülen links despite regulations

Normalization of Abduction, Torture, and Death in Erdogan’s Turkey

Turkey’s Maarif Foundation illegally seized German-run school in Ethiopia, says manager

Failed 2016 coup was gov’t plot to purge Gülenists from state bodies, journalist claims

In Case You Missed It

Unmasking Turkey’s most wanted man

Gülen’s lawyer files libel suit against Interior Minister Ala

Self-criticism by the Hizmet movement

Opposition condemns Erdoğan’s vindictive remarks against Gülen movement

Punjab university: Honorary PhD given to Turkish scholar Fethullah Gulen

Turkish Physicians heal Somali sufferers

Turkish volunteer doctors build bridges between Tanzania and Turkey

Copyright 2021 Hizmet News