What is the problem between the AK Party and Hizmet?

İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN DAĞI


Date posted: December 1, 2013

İHSAN DAĞI

Since the government demands unconditional loyalty and the subordination of social forces, the economic, political and intellectual independence of the Hizmet movement from the government seems to be the problem.

The state in Turkey remains the central agent capable of and willing to suppress social and economic actors. In the absence of checks and balances within the system, that results in the monopolization of power in the hands of the few, and it is inevitable that even elected rulers become authoritarian.

Neither civil society nor business groups is capable of restraining a state that defies the rule of law. On the contrary, they are expected to be subservient to the omnipotent state.

If any civil society network or business group claims autonomy from the state and rejects being subordinated to the state, they will be “punished” for their acts of “disloyalty.” Punishment may take different forms. For the Hizmet movement, it is closing down the prep schools, for business groups like Boydak Holding, it is unexpected tax inspections to be followed by heavy fines. By so doing, the state tries to teach civil society who is the boss: It is the state in abstraction, but in practice, it is the few in power who think they are the embodiment of the state.

Having defeated the Kemalists who used to claim that they were the state, the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) today displays a similar self-identification with the state. The Kemalists identified the state with the regime they established; the AK Party now identifies the state with its leader, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

The Kemalists regarded every ideology, every social group, every foreign government as a threat to the regime; the AK Party today views everything and everyone as conspiring against Erdoğan. This is not a healthy state of mind, yet it is the deep-rooted culture of those in power who think they are the state.

For the AK Party and the conservatives, it is an amazing journey to have gone from total exclusion by the state of the Kemalists to self-identification with the state and ownership of it within 10 years.

So the AK Party is now acting as the state has always acted in this land.

From the time of the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic, the state (i.e., the owners of the state) has never felt secure vis-à-vis its own people. So it watched its own people very carefully because it was the people who would eventually claim power, and it was the people who would stand up for their rights. Therefore, they had to be taken under control by either coercion or co-optation. This has been the way to overcome the sense of insecurity that prevails among the rulers. So the “ideal subject” for the Ottomans and “ideal citizen” for the republic was the person who was dependent on the state for his/her survival, welfare, wellbeing and honor.

Thus the state never tolerated the emergence of independent social and economic forces. This has also been the state tradition since the Ottoman Empire. Both the empire and the republic fought against autonomous social and economic forces that are regarded as being against the monopolization of power by the state elite. People who did not depend on the good will of the state or refused to be part of the state patronage were not trusted. Subordination of the people to the state was essential for its owners.

People were either co-opted by the state or treated as a threat. This is the state tradition in Turkey that has not changed from the times of the Ottoman Empire to the Turkish Republic.

I think this is the background to keep in mind to understand the recent attempt by the government to undermine the Hizmet movement by closing down prep schools. For over a decade, the movement supported the ruling AK Party but maintained its autonomy from the government. As a social movement it does not need the state, its patronage or favor to survive.

Since the government demands unconditional loyalty and the subordination of social forces, the economic, political and intellectual independence of the Hizmet movement from the government seems to be the problem.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 1, 2013


Related News

Rethinking the state-people relationship [in Turkey]

We all know that Turkey has to solve a number of critical problems to become a democratic, pluralist and transparent state that is ruled by law. It would be a good start to ask who is going to have priority in the country: Is it the people or the state? Once you put the people at the center, rather than the state, then you have to accept that no way of life can be imposed on people.

Erdoğan says his gov’t will carry out ‘witch hunt’

There are rumors that the only criteria behind these purges is links to a “parallel state,” a term the government has been using to define the Hizmet movement, which is a grassroots movement based on voluntary participation to spread interfaith dialogue and tolerance, with a particular emphasis on education.

8-year-old cancer patient denied passport due to father’s alleged links to Turkey’s Gülen group

Ahmet Ataç, an eight-year-old kid with stage four bone cancer, has reportedly been denied a passport by Turkish authorities due to the his father’s ongoing imprisonment over alleged links to Turkey’s Gülen group.

Gülen convinces people that Islam is integral part of global order

SEVGİ AKARÇEŞME, ABANT/TURKEY Professor Hans Köchler from Austria, the president of the International Progress Organization (IPO), has said the European Union’s resistance to Turkey’s membership is not due to its identity or its Islamic culture, as some argue, but mainly for economic reasons. The Abant Platform organized by the Journalists and Writers’ Foundation (GYV) hosted […]

Did Erdogan STAGE the coup?

‘Government should be won through a process of free and fair elections, not force,” Gulen said. “I pray to God for Turkey, for Turkish citizens, and for all those currently in Turkey that this situation is resolved peacefully and quickly.’ Gulen sharply rejected any responsibility: ‘As someone who suffered under multiple military coups during the past five decades, it is especially insulting to be accused of having any link to such an attempt.

Deputy PM denies profiling of citizens in gov’t, private sector

Sending messages on New Year’s Eve on his Twitter account, Parliament’s Constitutional Commission head and AK Party deputy Burhan Kuzu claimed that “an intelligence report that was submitted to the prime minister detailed a parallel structure within state,” adding that some 2,000 people’s names are listed in that report.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Mind-polluting leaks about Hizmet movement

Syrian Refugees Relief Campaign

Interview with Gulen in Kenya’s Daily Nation

UN Human Rights: Turkey should promptly end its protracted state of emergency

Turkish imams spied on Gülen sympathizers in Romania as well

Daily publishes evidence of ‘color lists’ used to recruit public sector employees

Erdoğan’s game plan for Hizmet

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News