Debating the constitution

Prof. Mumtazer Turkone
Prof. Mumtazer Turkone


Date posted: March 13, 2012

Mümtazer Türköne, 12 March 2012

I attended the debates on a new constitution over the weekend. The environment that the Abant Platform offers is intense and rich. Opposite ideas and views meet there, and holders of these views debate matters. Communicating directly with those who hold different views, reacting to their views instantly and reviewing the responses they get improves the democratic experience in a multidimensional way.

The Abant Platform has created a new style in political discussions in Turkey through its 20-year experience. This style should be called the Turkish version of deliberative democracy.

The most visible strength of deliberative democracy is its ability to change the parties involved. The deliberative environment not only allows the holders of different views to express themselves but also provides a forum for the exchange of different views. You have the chance to see just what the view you ardently support and promote equates to. You get to put your views to the test, through the lens of others. In the end, you review the weak parts of your views and polish the stronger sides. In the end, you change. For this reason, deliberative democracy offers an opportunity to form new unions.

The Abant Platform has discussed the most controversial aspects of the process of making a new constitution. Once the issues, classified into five main groups, are resolved, creating a new constitution will become a lot easier. For this reason, the findings and conclusions of the deliberations held under the heading, “Framework for a New Constitution,” in Abant provide insights and hints about the content of the new constitution.

The right to education in a person’s native language is the most controversial issue in the making of a new constitution. But when you deliberate this matter and seek to resolve the problem, a whole different outlook emerges. Once you acknowledge the right to education in one’s native language as a universal right, the issue is not resolved; to the contrary, it starts right there. How would you offer this service? The answers to this question, as well as examining the dynamics of the demand for education in one’s native language, will radically change one’s approach to this matter. Not banning education in one’s native language is a solution that all agree on. But what would happen once the ban is lifted? This represents an advanced stage, and even those who oppose the right to education in a person’s native language find themselves in a wholly different position when answering this question.

The issue of decentralization is an important matter that is linked to the Kurdish issue. A geography-based solution on the constitutional level to the Kurdish issue will not resolve the problems of the Kurds. Sixty percent of Kurds would still remain outside the scope of such a solution. The solutions offered so far, including democratic autonomy, fail to address all these problems.

The relationship between the state and religion and the religious schooling issue are also critical issues in the making of a new constitution. Once the focus is intensified upon the removal of the mandatory religious courses and classes, the monopoly of the state over religious schooling becomes an issue that restricts everything else. The Alevi citizens in particular raise serious objections to the status of the Religious Affairs Directorate. And this issue was raised at the Abant meeting. However, there is a lack of sufficient knowledge of the institutional structure of the Directorate and the services it provides. Deliberation changes the perspective and therefore the views. Deliberation clears the way for consensus and changes the demands raised by the involved parties as well.

Turkey is creating a new constitution. The efforts toward this constitution are being maintained through methods of deliberative democracy. The views spelled out in the final declaration of the Abant Platform offer strong insights on these matters. The conclusion? There is no single problem that will not be resolved.

Source: Today’s Zaman http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist-274082-debating-the-constitution.html

The Abant Platform is an independent think tank that takes its name from Lake Abant in the province of Bolu, the location of its first meeting. It is one of the most well-known programs of the GYV, which was established in 1994. Its mission and work were inspired by the GYV’s honorary president, Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen.

 


Related News

Is the March 30 referendum in danger?

It has become very evident that some businessmen who benefitted illegally in major state tenders acquired independent media, a person very close to Erdoğan was appointed as the editor-in-chief and that this media organ became a mouthpiece of Erdoğan. Independent civil society groups such as the Turkish Industrialists and Businessmen’s Association (TÜSİAD) and the Hizmet movement are constantly depicted as traitors and the puppets of international dark forces by Erdoğan.

Pathology of ‘Islamicist’ Erdogan Regime

In his hatred to the Gulen movement and to wipe out this movement, one of the most progressive educational Islamic movements that Muslim world has witnessed, the Erdogan regime has reached out to all kinds of political Islamicists throughout the Muslim world.

Is the Hizmet movement resisting normalization?

Accusing the Hizmet movement, which insistently demands the fulfillment of the steps towards democratization which I referred to above and contributes to the process of change as evidenced by its stance in the referendum, of serving as a parallel structure indirectly means: “I will not change myself and introduce universal reforms. You have to live with this painful fact for the normalization of the country and take your steps accordingly.”

Gülen, Hizmet, the state and the AKP

Gülen has placed much emphasis on education. With a new ijtihad (independent reasoning), he always stated that instead of building a mosque, religious businessmen must establish secular schools that will educate the future’s engineers, doctors, lawyers, journalists and yes, police, prosecutors and judges.

Gülen won’t change his stand, urges followers’ patience

Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen vowed to defend what he believes despite an organized attack by the government of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that employs hate speech, slander and outright lies in order to discredit him and members of the Hizmet movement.

State discrimination against Hizmet movement sympathizers

Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government is aiming to take all steps to finish off Hizmet movement sympathizers by any means. Discrimination is one of these steps. Discrimination is a human rights violation. I would like to share five of my personal experiences, of many more, to show what kind of discrimination is being committed against the movement’s sympathizers.

Latest News

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

In Case You Missed It

2014: Towards an “Empire of Fear”

Hate speech and respect for the sacred

Refugees from Erdogan’s Turkey seek to make a new life in Germany

65-year-old grandmother looking after twin babies as mother, father in jail for 5 months

Brazil court orders release of Gulen-linked businessman accused by Ankara of terrorism

Why should education in Pakistan be held hostage to the politics of other countries, however brotherly?

Le Monde: Ankara offered Senegalese government $7.5 million to transfer Yavuz Selim educational group to Maarif

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News