Gülen’s lawyer appeals arrest warrant

Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer representing Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, speaks to media in this file photo taken in July, 2014. (Photo: Today's Zaman)
Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer representing Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, speaks to media in this file photo taken in July, 2014. (Photo: Today's Zaman)


Date posted: January 21, 2015

İZZETTİN ÇİÇEK / ANKARA

Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer of Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, has appealed the decision of the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace to issue an arrest warrant for Gülen, citing illegality.

In his 13 point appeal, Albayrak stated the reasons why both the methods and the decision to issue an arrest warrant were against the law, underlining the fact that the warrant was issued despite the fact that Gülen was never called on to give testify and the fact that his address is known.

In December, the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace issued an arrest warrant for Gülen and requested that the scholar be extradited from the United States, which is seen as a step toward an Interpol Red Notice and ultimately extradition from the US. However, US law requires that the crime be recognized in both countries’ jurisdictions and that the offense not be political in nature.

The ruling Justice and Development party (AK Party) government has asked for the extradition of Gülen from the US several times since two major graft operations incriminating the inner circle of then-Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his family went public on Dec. 17 and 25, 2013. The government received negative replies from the authorities in America, due to a lack of charges. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan also personally asked US President Barack Obama to “deport” Gülen.

Albayrak stated that the court case which resulted in the issuing of an arrest warrant for Gülen, known as the “Tahşiyeciler” case, is ongoing. “Starting a new case based on the evidence of an ongoing case is a phenomenon that has never been seen nor will it ever be seen in the realm of law.”

According to Albayrak, the Code on Criminal Procedure (CMK) states that there must be “strong criminal suspicion and a reason for the arrest,” if an arrest warrant is to be issued, underlining that it is unclear what the criminal suspicions against Gülen consist of. Another one of the reasons why Albayrak states the decision of the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace to issue an arrest warrant for Gülen is unlawful is due to the fact that the court case against a group known as “Tahşiyeciler” is continuing, emphasizing that evidence from an ongoing court case cannot be used to begin another investigation.

In 2010, the police raided the homes and offices of 112 people affiliated with Tahşiyeciler. In the operations conducted across Turkey, police discovered three hand grenades, one smoke bomb, seven handguns, 18 hunting rifles, electronic parts for explosives, knives and a large cache of ammunition in the homes and offices of those 112 people.

The extradition pleas were even voiced by President Erdoğan himself; however, the result has until now always been negative. However, in the most recent attempt to extradite Gülen from the US via the police operations on independent media on Dec. 14 last year, when the editor-in-chief of the Zaman daily, Ekrem Dumanlı, was detained alongside the general manager of the Samanyolu Broadcasting Group and many journalists, TV producers and even scriptwriters. The charges placed against these prominent media personnel resulted in the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace issuing an arrest warrant for Gülen, who resides in rural Pennsylvania in the US, in self-imposed exile since 1999.

In his appeal, Albayrak cites the CMK, Article 98, which states that arrest warrants can be issued for those suspects who do not come [to give their statements] and those who cannot be reached. Albayrak stated that there has been no such call to Gülen even though his address is known; Albayrak added that according to bilateral agreements with the US, it is possible for US authorities to take Gülen’s testimony at his address if a summons is made, citing statements taken from Gülen’s address during the Feb. 28, 1997 coup era.

Highlighting that Gülen has never been a proponent of violence at any time in his life, Albayrak’s petition stresses that the sermons of Gülen or the books he authors have no criminal aspect to them. Albayrak also underlines that charges that Gülen has formed an organization trying to change the regime of the state are baseless.

Source: Today's Zaman , January 18, 2015


Related News

Kanter: You need to know what is going on in Turkey

Question: You are being called a terrorist by Turkish government. What is your opinion on the widespread use of this term by the Government? Kanter: This is a term that many governments are using to scare people and get public support. No one likes terrorists — so if you brand your opponents as terrorists it’s easy to get support. The Turkish government has even accuses the US of being terrorist sponsors, they are a joke now.

Neither conservative nor democrat

Media campaigns, accusations and the prime minister’s statements about the leader of the movement are of unprecedented scale in Turkey. Filing records on sympathizers of the Gülen movement, removing them from public offices they happen to occupy, attacking its financial institutions; none of this has ever been seen in the past regarding Islamic movements.

Canberra followers of Fethullah Gulen afraid to return to Turkey

Despite having recently become an Australian citizen, Mr Erdogan fears if he returned to Turkey at the moment he would be arrested as soon as he stepped off the plane. He has friends in Turkey who have been stripped of their livelihoods and forced to go into hiding as President Recep Tayyip Erdogan cracks down on “enemies of the state”.

Austrian Far-Right Leader Likens Turkish Coup to Reichstag Fire

“One almost had the impression that it was a guided putsch aimed in the end at making a presidential dictatorship by Erdogan possible,” Strache told the daily Die Presse in an interview published on Saturday.

Chestnut Retreat Center offers a look inside their Saylorsburg facility and its mission

“CRC envisions a society in which everybody is respected for who they are, people live in peace, everybody is included, the poor and needy are taken care of, and people of different background(s) can have friendly conversations in peace,” Ak said. “CRC believes in the importance of celebrating the commonalities and respecting differences.

High court accepts indictment against Cihaner and Gen. Berk

The Supreme Court of Appeals on Friday accepted an indictment concerning a former third army commander and a prosecutor, who is currently a Republican People’s Party (CHP) deputy, accusing the two men of founding and running a terrorist group. 2 March 2012 / TODAY’S ZAMAN, İSTANBUL The action plan details a military plan to destroy […]

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

The First Private Kurdish TV Channel in Turkey

Kimse Yok Mu distributes aid to Syrian refugees

Fresh resignation in Turkey’s ruling AKP over graft scandal

Davis: Moderate voices such as Gülen movement are sorely needed

Nigerian vice-ambassador demands more Turkish schools in his country

Ahmet Şık’s book and Ergenekon’s media campaign (2)

Gülen-linked teachers, businessman detained in Afghanistan

Copyright 2023 Hizmet News