Self-criticism by the Hizmet movement

İhsan Yılmaz
İhsan Yılmaz


Date posted: August 3, 2014

Some critics of the Hizmet movement argue that Hizmet never engages in self-criticism. That is not true. Let me explain why.

First of all, Hizmet is composed of volunteers who are heterogeneous in terms of religiosity, ideology, lifestyle, occupation, degree of involvement in Hizmet activities and so on. Second, since Hizmet is not a hierarchical organization, it does not have a headquarters. As a result, it is difficult to talk about Hizmet’s mistakes. One can talk about the mistakes of some Hizmet volunteers or institutions that are affiliated with Hizmet. Reasonable criticism about Hizmet can only be about the movement’s general ideas, ideals and actions that are shared by all volunteers and participants of the movement. Other than this, only self-criticism from Hizmet volunteers (or individual Hizmet institutions) should be expected.

All this do not mean that there is no self-criticism in Hizmet or that Hizmet volunteers never engage in self-criticism. On the contrary; Hizmet gets its dynamism from its volunteers’ constant evaluations of their projects, their actions and their behavior. This is quite normal. If these activities of self-criticism and self-evaluation did not take place, Hizmet could have never produced successful institutions in more than 160 countries. It is true that almost none of these criticisms are known by the wider public. Let me mention a few probable reasons that I can think of for this:

First, this criticism is about the internal affairs of Hizmet and it really does not concern outsiders. Second, those who do not know the movement well may easily misunderstand these criticisms and may not have a balanced picture of the movement. Third, religious groups in Turkey have almost always been banned and oppressed in Turkey. Even today, Hizmet is under siege by the state, led by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who is now allegedly in close cooperation with the Ergenekon terrorist organization. In such a climate, such groups will find it difficult and even dangerous to talk about their mistakes in public. Especially nowadays, when Hizmet is facing an existential threat by the anti-democratic and even despotic state run by Erdoğan’s clique, it is unjust to ask Hizmet to criticize itself. It is now struggling for survival. We must not forget that self-criticism is closely related to self-confidence.

Despite all this, from time to time, some individuals affiliated with Hizmet publicly criticize the movement’s projects and the actions of some Hizmet institutions and volunteers. For instance, Fethullah Gülen repeatedly states that we are all human and we all make mistakes. He says that whenever we face hardship, we must question our deeds, actions and intentions, since Allah punishes humans for their mistakes. On relations with the Justice and Development Party (AKP), he made a general criticism and said that we trusted the AKP too much and we were too close to it. We can apply this self-criticism, for instance, to the media affiliated with the movement. The Hizmet media could have shown more balanced coverage of the opposition parties in the past. They could have been more critical of the Erdoğan government while Hizmet’s relations with the AKP were good. They could have been more critical of the mistakes of the Ergenekon and Kurdistan Communities Union (KCK) trials, such as long detentions and the detention of journalists. With the pro-Ergenekon media trying to dilute the judicial investigations by constantly denying the credibility of the cases and focusing only on the mistakes, criticizing these trials was not, of course, easy for the pro-democratic camp, but the Hizmet media could have been more careful.

As far as I am concerned, I have tried to criticize myself and Hizmet volunteers in this column for years. Whenever I criticize practicing Muslims in this column, it definitely includes myself and Hizmet volunteers. I remember using the phrase “we practicing Muslims” many times in this column when discussing all sorts of issues. I gave an interview to the Armenian-Turkish weekly Agos and criticized some actions of the majority of Hizmet volunteers. But since I do not loathe the Hizmet movement and do not say that “Hizmet is dangerous,” these polite and constructive criticisms never catch the attention of the adversaries of Hizmet.

Source: Today's Zaman , August 02, 2014


Related News

Erdoğan now targets foreign countries for granting asylum to critics

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has blasted foreign countries who granted asylum to sympathizers of the Gülen movement after they fled Turkey fearing persecution amid post-coup witch hunt.

Arrested journalist: I am on guard duty for democracy

Samanyolu TV Group General Manager Hidayet Karaca, who has been under arrest since a government-backed police operation against independent media outlets on Dec. 14, 2014, stated in a letter on Monday that his imprisonment for the last 66 days without legal justification is a result of his being on guard duty for democracy.

Turkish Police Wait To Detain Another Women Just Hours After Delivery

Turkish government, which has imprisoned at least 700 babies so far, is now trying to imprison one more mother together with her newly born baby in Kahramanmaraş province on Tuesday.

Filipina, infant freed from Turkish jail, but…

The Filipina mother who forcibly was separated from her infant and detained in Turkey for weeks has been released. But their reunion is being cut short by her deportation, in the crackdown following a failed coup in which she had no part. Information is being withheld from Karen’s lawyer and the Philippine Embassy staff assisting her. Forcible separation of an infant from her mother is a humanitarian concern.

Debunking The Gülen-Erdoğan Relationship

Yes, at one time, there had been rapprochement and mutual support, but reality and history show that such an alliance has long been overstated. The truth is, Erdoğan and Gülen only came together when Erdoğan’s stated goals reflected deeply held beliefs by Gülen. As is often the case, perception is mistaken for reality. Gülen is not Erdoğan’s biggest threat, nor was he his chief ally.

GYV warns on provocative remarks, urges respect for peaceful protests

The Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) on Friday called for the government to refrain from provocative statements that may undermine peace in the society and to respect the right of freedom of assembly, while denouncing the violence displayed in mass protests across Turkey that was triggered by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) attacks on the Syrian Kurdish town of Kobani.

Latest News

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

In Case You Missed It

Bridge-building in ‘enemy country’ – Story of a Turkish asylum seeker in Greece

My opinion on the book ‘Imam’s Army’

Pakistan: Islamabad High Court rejects petition by Erdogan’s Maarif Foundation

Erdoğan hampers girls’ education [by shutting down prep schools run by the Hizmet movement]

MHP deputy dismissed gang allegations against Hizmet Movement

Fethullah Gulen: I Condemn All Threats to Turkey’s Democracy

Understanding Fethullah Gülen (1)

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News