Silencing Taraf daily

Emre Uslu
Emre Uslu


Date posted: December 6, 2013

EMRE USLU

The liberal Taraf daily, where I write a column, is one of the few independent newspapers in this country.

Those who don’t know the Turkish media well need to know that media outlets are largely owned by private holdings which have close ties to the government. Thus, Turkish newspapers need to consider whether their reporting would harm their bosses’ business connections with the government.

Another group of newspapers are published by social groups as a mechanism to reach out to larger segments of society and as a shield defending the group’s rights when the government or other group launches negative campaigns against that particular group.

Unfortunately the Turkish state has always been very powerful. Worst, the state bureaucracy and, from time to time, democratically elected governments have not hesitated to go after social groups when they believe that a certain group poses a threat to the government or state ideology. It is during the period when the state/government decides to launch an offensive campaign against a certain group that social groups need media outlets to defend them the most.

The liberal Taraf daily is perhaps the only exception to these media outlets and publishes newspapers as an art of journalistic enthusiasm. Thus, regardless of premeditated considerations, the editors of Taraf publish items that are considered newsworthy according to Western standards.

For this very reason, many officials trust Taraf and share documents with them for various reasons. The editors of Taraf do not discuss why certain documents come to them at certain times. What the editors discuss is whether the document is authentic and whether it bears any information that can be considered news.

It is because of this attitude of Taraf that officials continue to share their documents with us. Usually, such documents come to us when there is a conflict within the government.

Last week Taraf published critical documents which revealed that the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government had accepted a plan for a crackdown against the Fethullah Gülen movement and other religious groups as well. It was shocking to find out that AKP ministers, including Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and President Abdullah Gül, had signed a plan against the Gülen movement though they all seem to be getting along well in public.

In following days, Taraf also published several documents which indicated that members of the Gülen movement in Turkey and abroad were under a heavy profiling program and that the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) continuously kept records about members of the Gülen movement.

More importantly, it was revealed that those who were profiled were dismissed from their critical posts in the government. Worst, members of the Gülen movement argue that the government also profiles businesses based on their proximity to any social or religious groups.

According to Turkish and international laws, it is a crime to put a legal group under heavy surveillance.

Expectedly, Taraf published the documents which launched an intense debate about what the AKP government was trying to do.

In response, the AKP government, the Cabinet, discussed for four hours how to silence Taraf. Keep in mind that the Cabinet has very rarely discussed a critical issue for this long. Thus silencing Taraf must be a very important issue for the Cabinet to devote almost five hours to think how to silence Taraf.

Unfortunately the Prime Minister’s Office, the National Security Council (MGK) and MİT all went to court separately to silence Taraf. They are accusing Taraf of publishing confidential documents which incriminate Turkish citizens, committing espionage and terrorism.

The most bizarre accusation about Taraf came from MİT. According to MİT, Taraf published reports to incite Germany to wage war against Turkey. The evidence they provided was Angela Merkel’s photo and Erdoğan’s photo.

For Westerners who might think I am joking, no I am not. Indeed MİT sued Taraf for inciting Germany to wage war against Turkey. Our young reporter Huseyin Ozcaya faces dozens of years in prison due to charges in this odd court case…

For experienced Turkish citizens, we all know what all this is: a way of silencing Taraf…

Source: Today's Zaman , December 6, 2013


Related News

Twitter shouldn’t let itself become a tool for tyrants

Journalists have been in Mr. Erdogan’s crosshairs, and his campaign is pushing into the digital universe, too. Turkey is pressing Twitter to silence journalists, and Twitter must resist more vigorously. Twitter is a powerful force for free expression. “The tweets must flow,” the company likes to say. But they don’t always flow, as freedom of speech and democracy are in retreat around the globe.

They think we are terrorists, they think we are evil

Another woman, a former Turkish journalist before the government shut down papers that spoke out against it, said: “I feel like my voice has been taken. People don’t feel safe in London, even going shopping, because we don’t know what radicals will do.”

Hate Speech is Undermining Turkey’s Fragile Democracy

Many TV viewers could not believe their ears upon hearing the terms “blood sucking vampires, leeches, traitors, spies, worse than Shiites, and assassins” uttered by then Turkish prime minister Erdogan in his political rallies.

Gülen’s lawyers slam Erdoğan’s ‘slanderous’ unsolved murders remarks

The lawyers of Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen have denounced recent statements by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in which he held the Hizmet movement responsible for some unsolved murders in Turkey.

Erdoğan’s propagandist think tanks

Erdoğan’s government coming after the strongest civic group, the Hizmet movement, in Turkey is not an isolated incident but rather fits a pattern of how Erdoğan defines democracy and how he handles nongovernmental organizations in the country.

Lawyer of arrested officers detained for Gülen movement propaganda

Lawyer Kemal Uçar, known for his critical statements concerning July 15, 2016 coup attempt cases, has been detained as part of an investigation into the Gülen movement, Milliyet daily reported. Uçar used to share messages on social media that the ByLock mobile phone app cannot be used as evidence to arrest people. Uçar said on a TV program that 52 of 58 casings found in Taksim on the coup night were not fired by soldiers according to an official report.

Latest News

Sacramento leaders gather for Iftar dinner in celebration of Ramadan

SEO Skill Suite: Tools for Keyword Research, Technical & Backlink Analysis

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

In Case You Missed It

Prep school students dominate LYS university entrance exam

Pak-Turk International Schools Foundation-Stone Laying Ceremony

Nigerian youths can excel in Olympiads

“It was so cold, it felt like an arrow through my heart”

Filipino – Turkish Tolerance School students excel in ICAS 2014 exam, Ten others top in campus journalism

I am concerned: Erdoğan and elections

Q&A: Turkish Imam Fethullah Gulen

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News