The real issue is the National Security Council [in Turkey]

CAFER SOLGUN
CAFER SOLGUN


Date posted: December 10, 2013

CAFER SOLGUN

Today, I was going to write about “knowing yourself,” to continue where I left off in my last column. However, it seems that it’s no use to talk in philosophical language. We are living in a time when we need to express our opinions more precisely. At least a note should be left in history’s records.

A recent report by the Taraf daily indicating that the National Security Council (MGK) had formed a plan to destroy the Gülen movement has sparked discussions. This is only natural, considering that the current political administration is known for its adherence to religious values. This report is huge news because the government failed to oppose the military in the MGK meeting.

Government spokespeople, as well as columnists and writers who feel they have to defend the government and Erdoğan no matter what they do, immediately adopted a defensive stance. And they argued that the plan devised at the council meeting was never implemented. This could have been a reasonable argument or pretext if combined with the admission that they just weren’t very competent back then. What would make this excuse even more acceptable would be a sincere, public confession by the ruling party.

But they did not do this, because Taraf daily went on to prove that the plan has actually been implemented and that under this plan, people have been profiled. In addition, the prime minister, who apparently doesn’t like defensive statements or formal apologies, took action and filed a criminal complaint against the Taraf daily, accusing it of espionage and revealing state secrets. What’s more, the prime minister also called Taraf a traitor in public rallies. He also argued that a campaign was being waged against his party and said that if he revealed certain things about those behind the campaign, the earth would move.

This showed that we actually have another criterion for state secrets: If a document favors the government, then it is good, and media is free to report on it. But if not, then it is bad, and revealing it is considered treason.

These reports also proved that the MGK maintains significant influence over the legitimately elected government and Parliament. I think that the most important factors in the ongoing debate are the attempts to keep this council out of the discussion, instead of investigating its mission and activities. I do not think that the issue is limited to the drafting of plans to eliminate the Gülen movement. For instance, in the MGK meetings, what was said about the fundamental issues of democratization in our country, and what decisions were made in respect to these issues? Facing up to the decisions and minutes of the MGK meetings has become a prerequisite for the normalization for our democracy, which is a regime of openness and transparency. This discussion has taught us this once again.

I believe that the attempts to divert attention by raising accusations of treason have to do with other dimensions of this issue, and those dimensions are more important than we think.

Nobody has been able to achieve anything positive by making reference to blackmail and imposition so far. I am not sure whether or not Erdoğan and his advisers are aware of this, but the prime minister’s methods of dealing with critical national issues were in the past likened to those of Turgut Özal; however, now they are comparing his style to that of Tansu Çiller.

Somebody should remind Erdoğan, who says that his explanations would move the earth, that nothing would happen. And if you make a statement, then you have to be consistent and do whatever you promised to do or you will march toward the abyss waiting to receive you.

A Latin saying best explains this: “Abyssus abyssum invocate” (deep calleth unto deep, or one misstep leads to another). This suggests that if you do not learn lessons from your errors, then it becomes inevitable that you make more mistakes.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 10, 2013


Related News

Kimse Yok Mu “InnovAction for Poverty” Research Paper Competition is Open for Master or PhD students or graduates!

Kimse Yok Mu “InnovAction for Poverty” Research Paper Competition is Open for Master or PhD students or graduates!

Erdogan and Gulen: Inevitable Clash?

Unlike Turkey’s classical Islamic activists, Gulen always distanced himself from politics, and like Said Nursi, his main source of inspiration, his message was focused on grassroots social activism, most importantly an education combining both Islam and modern science. Hizmet’s main goal was social: raising a new “golden” generation fusing moderate Muslim and Modern ethics to become the backbone of Turkey’s society and bureaucracy and its messengers to the world.

A dirty war in the run-up to the elections

With the Gülen movement officially marked in police reports as being a “terrorist organization,” we can say that the ruling party’s war against the civilian populace has truly reached its dirtiest stage. A brief summary: The Gülen movement is undoubtedly one of the Muslim world’s most peaceful and tolerant civil movements ever.

Özfatura: Erdoğan does not want civil society that is not pro-AK Party

Dr. Burhan Özfatura was witnessed the meetings of former President Turgut Özal and former Prime Minister Tansu Çiller with Fethullah Gülen. He says: “Both asked what they can do for him. Gülen told them not to believe anybody who asks for a favor by referring to himself.”

Fethullah Gulen and His Movement: A Brief Introduction

KASHIF HASAN KHAN July 1, 2012 We often talk about revivalism in education system so as to change the direction of our young generation, who seems to have forgotten the very fundamentals. Undoubtedly, our leaders have played a vital role and contributed a lot to it, but we can’t live up to that forever; we […]

Row between Turkish government and Gulen Movement takes new twist

The row between Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and Fethullah Gulen’s Hizmet Movement, one of the most influential religious communities in the country, has taken an interesting twist after the revelation of a 2004 document. In 2004, the National Security Council proposed a clampdown on the Gulen movement (aka Hizmet), which suggested that harsh sanctions should be enforced on them.

Latest News

That is Why the Turkish Government could Pay 1 Billion Euros

ECtHR rules Bulgaria violated rights of Turkish journalist who was deported despite seeking asylum

Fethullah Gülen’s Message of Condolences in the Wake of the Western European Floods

Pregnant woman kept in prison for 4 months over Gülen links despite regulations

Normalization of Abduction, Torture, and Death in Erdogan’s Turkey

Turkey’s Maarif Foundation illegally seized German-run school in Ethiopia, says manager

Failed 2016 coup was gov’t plot to purge Gülenists from state bodies, journalist claims

Grondahl: Turkish community strong in wake of threats from back home

Turkish-Kyrgyz educator’s abduction shows Ankara’s ruthless disregard for law: HRW

In Case You Missed It

Toward an Islamic Enlightenment: The Gulen Movement (Book Review)

Lambsdorff: Turkish press intimidated, under pressure

Turkish schools important for northern Iraq’s future

Turkish schools and the race in philanthropy!

RTÜK issues fines to intimidate Samanyolu TV

Ahmet Şık’s book and Ergenekon’s media campaign (3)

Remarks by Congressman Randy Weber (Representing Texas) at IFLC Washington DC

Copyright 2021 Hizmet News