Division at home, cooperation abroad


Date posted: December 7, 2013

JOOST LAGENDIJK

Last week I visited Canada to speak at a panel on Turkey in Ottawa and give a lecture on Turkey-EU relations at the Munk School for Global Affairs in Toronto. The panel was part of the first Turkic-Canadian Convention intended to boost economic and cultural relations between Canada and Turkey. The convention was organized by the Anatolian Heritage Federation and was also attended by five members of the Turkish Parliament from the three major parties.

The panel went fine, although the Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputies could not appreciate my critical comments on the way the government had handled the Gezi Park protests, and the outreach of the convention to Canadian politicians and businessmen was successful.

What struck me most, however, during my Ottawa visit was the welcome reception that was organized for us in the Anatolian Cultural Centre that had been opened officially only one month before. I was impressed by the traditional kindness and hospitality of our hosts but also by the self-sacrifice and spirit of cooperation on display by the local, mainly Turkish migrants who had set up this center. In talking to them it became crystal clear how important the center is for the Turkish community in Ottawa to meet other Turks and share experiences, but also to use it as a platform to invite Canadians from other beliefs and convictions and show them what Turkey and Turks have to offer.

This combination of cherishing your own common history and at the same time setting up a dialogue with your fellow Canadians with a different background is what makes these kinds of centers all over North America such special places.

I am sure most of the Canadian Turks present that evening share some basics but probably disagree on other issues, such as political preferences, as well. Their willingness to cooperate across ideological borders contradicts sharply with the polarization between similar groups and persons that we can witness in Turkey these days. I asked several people that evening how they assessed the nasty row between the Turkish government and the Hizmet Movement on a growing list of topics, now focused on prep schools. It turned out, not surprisingly, that most of the persons I spoke to had voted AKP in the past and have warm feelings for the Hizmet Movement. It was obvious they were torn between their political affiliation and their social, cultural and religious preferences. None of them could understand why the ruling party was provoking such a clash between two sides that, in their perception, both had a big interest in sticking together in the unfinished struggle for a more democratic Turkey.

Their bottom line: Why are politicians in Ankara not able to do what we, Turkish Canadians, are practicing daily: Focus on communalities and accept differences?

There is one Canadian anecdote I do not want to withhold from you. In August 2011, I wrote a column in this newspaper about the book “How Happy to Call Oneself a Turk,” written by Gavin D. Brockett, an associate professor of Middle East and Islamic History at Wilfrid Laurier University in Kitchener, Canada. That article was read by Engin Sezen and his wife, both Turkish historians living in Canada who at that moment were looking for a job. They did not know Brockett or his book about the construction of the Turkish identity but were intrigued by the column and decided to contact Brockett to discuss that topic and other related issues. After some time they got together and one year ago Engin and his wife both got a job offer from Laurier University. When, only one week ago, Engin heard I would be visiting Toronto, one hour drive from Kitchener, he contacted the organizers and set up a last-minute meeting for me to speak about Turkey in that small university city. I only heard his remarkable story in which my column had played such a crucial role when we met in Kitchener last Wednesday and went for lunch together with Brockett. I can’t stop smiling when I tell others about this story of an article and its unintended consequences on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 8, 2013


Related News

Sending Fethullah Gulen to Turkey would be a national disgrace

Is Gulen one of the good guys or the bad guys? I have no idea, but that’s seriously not the point here. The cleric has been granted permanent resident alien status and now resides in Pennsylvania. As such, he’s “our problem” now and is entitled to a fair shake. …any plan to ship Gulen to Turkey would be a national disgrace.

Turkey has not achieved enough democratization for Fethullah Gülen’s return

Kenan Taş Mustafa Yesil: “The possible tension between the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and the Gülen movement is what the pro-guardianship figures desire most. Moreover, it should be recalled how satisfied they were during the constitutional and presidential election crises in 2007 and the AK Party closure case in 2008. Turkey is passing […]

Embracing the World: Fethullah Gülen’s Thought and Its Relationship to Jalaluddin Rumi and Others

This is neither a comprehensive study of Fethullah Gülen nor is it a comprehensive study of Jalaluddin Rumi. What I am seeking to do is to explore the places where the thought of the one is echoed in the thinking of the other, either overtly or indirectly—and to note ways in which the opposite is true: that Gülen diverges from Rumi.

West Hartford State Rep. Receives ‘Statesman of the Year Award’

“I’m deeply honored to have been selected to receive this recognition from the Peace Island Institute, an organization that is committed to protecting children, safeguarding the environment, and promoting peaceful coexistence,” Fleischmann said in a statement.

EU anti-terror chief: Gülen network not terrorist organization

The EU doesn’t believe Fethullah Gülen’s network is a terrorist organization and is not “likely to change its position soon,” the bloc’s counter-terrorism coordinator told Reuters in an interview published Thursday.

Princeton professor accuses Gulen of orchestrating Turkish coup, Harvard professor disagrees

Edward Owen, professor of Middle East history at Harvard, said that he did not believe in Reynold’s certainty of Gülen’s guilt. Owen added that when a person writes “alarmist pieces” like Reynolds’, the main audience for the pieces is Washington. “It is a way of calling attention to yourself, and I imagine that Professor Reynolds would like his name registered by the people in Washington as somebody to go to, to employ, when there is a change in administration in Washington,” Owen said.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Pacifica Institute Utah hosts ‘Love is a Verb’ screening for interfaith season

Society ready for a new constitution, but how about politics?

Central bank data disprove interior minister’s rigging claims

2-month-old denied breast milk for 17 days while under detention with mother

‘Escape from Turkey’ recounts stories of post-coup crackdown victims fleeing Turkey

Moved by Syrian refugees’ woes, U.S. mayors initiate blanket drive

A Genocide in the Making – Genocidal action stage by stage by the Turkish government against the Hizmet movement

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News