Division at home, cooperation abroad


Date posted: December 7, 2013

JOOST LAGENDIJK

Last week I visited Canada to speak at a panel on Turkey in Ottawa and give a lecture on Turkey-EU relations at the Munk School for Global Affairs in Toronto. The panel was part of the first Turkic-Canadian Convention intended to boost economic and cultural relations between Canada and Turkey. The convention was organized by the Anatolian Heritage Federation and was also attended by five members of the Turkish Parliament from the three major parties.

The panel went fine, although the Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputies could not appreciate my critical comments on the way the government had handled the Gezi Park protests, and the outreach of the convention to Canadian politicians and businessmen was successful.

What struck me most, however, during my Ottawa visit was the welcome reception that was organized for us in the Anatolian Cultural Centre that had been opened officially only one month before. I was impressed by the traditional kindness and hospitality of our hosts but also by the self-sacrifice and spirit of cooperation on display by the local, mainly Turkish migrants who had set up this center. In talking to them it became crystal clear how important the center is for the Turkish community in Ottawa to meet other Turks and share experiences, but also to use it as a platform to invite Canadians from other beliefs and convictions and show them what Turkey and Turks have to offer.

This combination of cherishing your own common history and at the same time setting up a dialogue with your fellow Canadians with a different background is what makes these kinds of centers all over North America such special places.

I am sure most of the Canadian Turks present that evening share some basics but probably disagree on other issues, such as political preferences, as well. Their willingness to cooperate across ideological borders contradicts sharply with the polarization between similar groups and persons that we can witness in Turkey these days. I asked several people that evening how they assessed the nasty row between the Turkish government and the Hizmet Movement on a growing list of topics, now focused on prep schools. It turned out, not surprisingly, that most of the persons I spoke to had voted AKP in the past and have warm feelings for the Hizmet Movement. It was obvious they were torn between their political affiliation and their social, cultural and religious preferences. None of them could understand why the ruling party was provoking such a clash between two sides that, in their perception, both had a big interest in sticking together in the unfinished struggle for a more democratic Turkey.

Their bottom line: Why are politicians in Ankara not able to do what we, Turkish Canadians, are practicing daily: Focus on communalities and accept differences?

There is one Canadian anecdote I do not want to withhold from you. In August 2011, I wrote a column in this newspaper about the book “How Happy to Call Oneself a Turk,” written by Gavin D. Brockett, an associate professor of Middle East and Islamic History at Wilfrid Laurier University in Kitchener, Canada. That article was read by Engin Sezen and his wife, both Turkish historians living in Canada who at that moment were looking for a job. They did not know Brockett or his book about the construction of the Turkish identity but were intrigued by the column and decided to contact Brockett to discuss that topic and other related issues. After some time they got together and one year ago Engin and his wife both got a job offer from Laurier University. When, only one week ago, Engin heard I would be visiting Toronto, one hour drive from Kitchener, he contacted the organizers and set up a last-minute meeting for me to speak about Turkey in that small university city. I only heard his remarkable story in which my column had played such a crucial role when we met in Kitchener last Wednesday and went for lunch together with Brockett. I can’t stop smiling when I tell others about this story of an article and its unintended consequences on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 8, 2013


Related News

Erdogan at UN urges global action against preacher

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday demanded at UN speech international action against the US-exiled preacher Fethullah Gulen, whom he accuses of orchestrating an aborted coup d’etat against him. Gulen, who fled Turkey for Pennsylvania and has been active in religious dialogue and charity, strongly denies Erdogan’s charges that he organized the July military coup attempt, which quickly collapsed.

Bipartisan think-tank: The U.S. should not interfere politically in Gülen extradition case

If the executive branch were to interfere too forcefully in the Gülen extradition case now, it would only confirm Turkish leaders’ belief that the U.S. system operates on the same corrupt terms as Turkey’s. This would fundamentally affirm Erdoğan’s view that democracy as a value and a practice is a purely cynical discourse used by Western powers to harm Turkey.

A new book by Esposito and Yavuz on ‘The Gülen Movement’

Ali H. Aslan Teachings of Fethullah Gülen which have inspired hundreds and thousands of Turkish people work for global education, peace, and the spread of tolerance, has become the subject of a new scholarly book in the U.S. The book entitled, ‘Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gülen Movement,’ was published by one of […]

O.C. Muslim leaders speak out against extremism

Along with the lives they destroy and extinguish, terrorists who commit these heinous acts in the name of Islam also hurt the global community of Muslims, a majority of whom lead peaceful, productive lives.

Separation politics and Islam makes Gülen AKP’s enemy

“The Gülen Movement is faith inspired in its motivation, but faith neutral in its manifestation.” That is how key speaker Ozcan Keles, chairperson of Dialogue Society in London, characterized the Gülen Movement in a panel discussion on the Hizmet Movement Tuesday in the European Parliament.

Toward a party state

At this point, the only thing Erdoğan can do is manufacture false charges and evidence against the Hizmet movement, which wouldn’t be persuasive. In a normal democratic state where the rule of law is cherished, there must be concrete evidence to press charges against anyone, and those so charged are presumed innocent until they are proven guilty. In a party state, however, imaginary charges are first voiced and then meddlesome public authorities manufacture crimes and criminals to fit those charges.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

The Hizmet Movement: ‘Terrorist’ or Terrorised?

Erdoğan’s stance on Turkish Schools turns to hatred after corruption probes

Turkish volunteers reach out to orphans in Nairobi

Erdoğan says personally pursuing fight against ‘parallel structure’

Grand stage shows by Turkish Olympiad students enthrall İzmir locals

Threat to destroy the Hizmet Movement a hate crime

Turkey crackdown: deep unease in Fethullah Gulen’s home village

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News