Gülen’s lawyer appeals arrest warrant

Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer representing Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, speaks to media in this file photo taken in July, 2014. (Photo: Today's Zaman)
Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer representing Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, speaks to media in this file photo taken in July, 2014. (Photo: Today's Zaman)


Date posted: January 21, 2015

İZZETTİN ÇİÇEK / ANKARA

Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer of Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, has appealed the decision of the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace to issue an arrest warrant for Gülen, citing illegality.

In his 13 point appeal, Albayrak stated the reasons why both the methods and the decision to issue an arrest warrant were against the law, underlining the fact that the warrant was issued despite the fact that Gülen was never called on to give testify and the fact that his address is known.

In December, the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace issued an arrest warrant for Gülen and requested that the scholar be extradited from the United States, which is seen as a step toward an Interpol Red Notice and ultimately extradition from the US. However, US law requires that the crime be recognized in both countries’ jurisdictions and that the offense not be political in nature.

The ruling Justice and Development party (AK Party) government has asked for the extradition of Gülen from the US several times since two major graft operations incriminating the inner circle of then-Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and his family went public on Dec. 17 and 25, 2013. The government received negative replies from the authorities in America, due to a lack of charges. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan also personally asked US President Barack Obama to “deport” Gülen.

Albayrak stated that the court case which resulted in the issuing of an arrest warrant for Gülen, known as the “Tahşiyeciler” case, is ongoing. “Starting a new case based on the evidence of an ongoing case is a phenomenon that has never been seen nor will it ever be seen in the realm of law.”

According to Albayrak, the Code on Criminal Procedure (CMK) states that there must be “strong criminal suspicion and a reason for the arrest,” if an arrest warrant is to be issued, underlining that it is unclear what the criminal suspicions against Gülen consist of. Another one of the reasons why Albayrak states the decision of the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace to issue an arrest warrant for Gülen is unlawful is due to the fact that the court case against a group known as “Tahşiyeciler” is continuing, emphasizing that evidence from an ongoing court case cannot be used to begin another investigation.

In 2010, the police raided the homes and offices of 112 people affiliated with Tahşiyeciler. In the operations conducted across Turkey, police discovered three hand grenades, one smoke bomb, seven handguns, 18 hunting rifles, electronic parts for explosives, knives and a large cache of ammunition in the homes and offices of those 112 people.

The extradition pleas were even voiced by President Erdoğan himself; however, the result has until now always been negative. However, in the most recent attempt to extradite Gülen from the US via the police operations on independent media on Dec. 14 last year, when the editor-in-chief of the Zaman daily, Ekrem Dumanlı, was detained alongside the general manager of the Samanyolu Broadcasting Group and many journalists, TV producers and even scriptwriters. The charges placed against these prominent media personnel resulted in the İstanbul 1st Penal Court of Peace issuing an arrest warrant for Gülen, who resides in rural Pennsylvania in the US, in self-imposed exile since 1999.

In his appeal, Albayrak cites the CMK, Article 98, which states that arrest warrants can be issued for those suspects who do not come [to give their statements] and those who cannot be reached. Albayrak stated that there has been no such call to Gülen even though his address is known; Albayrak added that according to bilateral agreements with the US, it is possible for US authorities to take Gülen’s testimony at his address if a summons is made, citing statements taken from Gülen’s address during the Feb. 28, 1997 coup era.

Highlighting that Gülen has never been a proponent of violence at any time in his life, Albayrak’s petition stresses that the sermons of Gülen or the books he authors have no criminal aspect to them. Albayrak also underlines that charges that Gülen has formed an organization trying to change the regime of the state are baseless.

Source: Today's Zaman , January 18, 2015


Related News

Turkey’s ‘terrorists’ active in India. But who are they really?

Interestingly, Gulen was once an important ally of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and going by his ideology, comes across as a more moderate figure than Erdogan, who has been pushing an Islamic ideology which has little space for secularism. Till very recently, Erdogan’s policy being criticised for allegedly allowing Turkish territory to be used by terrorists.

Hizmet school ready to pioneer education in Kurdish

Following the decision to allow education in languages other than Turkish in private schools, as part of the democratization package recently unveiled by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, a private school run by Gülen movement volunteers said it is ready to start education in Kurdish once such a law is introduced.

The Hizmet Movement and Solutions to Today’s Problems

The Hizmet Essay Contest is a contest series that encourages research on the Hizmet movement and Fethullah Gulen. The contest aims to motivate individuals to research the works of Fethullah Gulen and the activities of various Hizmet institutions locally and globally, with the purpose of addressing how the Hizmet movement contributes to the individual, the […]

Turkey Wants Mongolia To Shut Down Turkish Schools

Just ten years ago, Turkish Parliament Speaker Bulent Arinc recalled a dramatic scene. One diplomat dropped his teacup upon hearing that he was posted to Mongolia with 5,000 USD, special residence, and a car — a lavish job at that time. “How can I live there?” the diplomat reportedly asked, according to Arinc.

Gülen’s lawyer, Court of Appeals deny claims of AK Party official

“I think the ministry of justice went beyond its authority in making a change requiring the judges and prosecutors to inform the administration about investigations,” Akyol further added, urging everyone to keep the rule of law above political conflicts.

Police chief request promotion for taking part in ‘parallel’ witch-hunt

Eskişehir Deputy Police Chief Şakir Engin Korkmaz has filed a letter requesting a sanction banning his promotion be lifted on grounds that he had taken part in the ongoing operation against the so-called parallel state, which has been described as a witch hunt.

Latest News

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

After Reunion: A Quiet Transformation Within the Hizmet Movement

Erdogan’s Failed Crusade: The World Rejects His War on Hizmet

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

In Case You Missed It

Court accepts indictment against 9 officers in case seen as political witch hunt

Global education turns Turkish teachers into world citizens

Switzerland: Number of Turkish asylum-seekers more than doubles

Kosovo PM to Turkey’s Erdogan: ‘We Mind Our Own Affairs’

Peshawar High Court halts government order to deport Pak-Turk school staff

Discussing identity, multiculturalism and peace-building in Indonesia

Ankara-supplied clerics spy on Turkish-Australian communities

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News