Neither conservative nor democrat

İHSAN DAĞI
İHSAN DAĞI


Date posted: February 23, 2014

İHSAN DAĞI

The ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP), in its early years of government, claimed to be a conservative and democratic party. At times it acted as such, demonstrating that a reformed Islamist party could soften its ideological stance and embrace democracy as their form of governance.

It continued to appeal to the masses with religious symbolism and discourse, but abandoned Islamism as a comprehensive program for the state and society. Initially during the AKP rule, Islam became more visible and Islamic networks enjoyed the utmost freedom after years of authoritarian secularism, and flourished. The AKP did advocate a conservative social vision that included moderation, family values, social solidarity, the glorification of history, a dislike of alcohol consumption, etc.

But more recently, the ruling party has gathered confidence to seek a more assertive social agenda, imposing its values through state apparatuses both to please its religious grassroots supporters and intimidate its secular opponents. This has turned into a new form of social engineering to create a “new society” and “raise a religious generation,” which goes far beyond a “conservative” political agenda.

Besides, “conservative values” are being increasingly questioned as a result of a recent corruption probe involving top government people and their relatives. The attempt of the government to cover up corruption allegations and stop the investigation has added to a questioning of the moral values claimed to be upheld by the ruling party. A system of corruption and money laundering can hardly be justified on any moral ground. Repeated lies made by people who occupy public office, a government-orchestrated media mechanism spreading black propaganda and disclosed cases in which Erdoğan himself intervenes in the daily management of media outlets is eroding the image of morality championed by the “conservative” AKP.

Moreover, the AKP has undermined the standing of Islamic orders and groups. The AKP wanted to establish a monopoly over religious activities and networks, trying to subordinate them all to its will and preferences. Once autonomous social forces, Islamic groups have come under the control of the government in return for government funds and posts. In this patronage relationship, the autonomy and self-sufficiency of Islamic groups has been left out. The damage of this dependency on the government is that, in the long run, it will be very hard for Islamic orders and groups to survive in the aftermath of the AKP rule.

In this context, an Islamic group, the Hizmet movement, which resisted government patronage, has come under tremendous pressure recently. Media campaigns, accusations and the prime minister’s statements about the leader of the movement are of unprecedented scale in Turkey. Filing records on sympathizers of the Gülen movement, removing them from public offices they happen to occupy, attacking its financial institutions and accusing them of serving the interests of the US and Israel; none of this has ever been seen in the past regarding Islamic movements.

Islamic activities and groups have been discredited as a result of the government’s attempt to control them all. This has set a precedent for future governments with as strict a secularist agenda. If Turkey experiences such an authoritarian secularist regime again, all Islamic groups and networks may face oppressive policies that follow from the policies and discourse of the current “conservative government.”

In short, it is hard to regard the AKP as a conservative party any longer. Its discourse, policies and core supporters appear more radical and doctrinaire, determined to use the state apparatus to perpetuate a rule of religious authoritarianism, an authoritarianism justified and popularized by Islamic references.

The ruling party has consumed all of its democratic credentials. Under their control, Turkey is departing from democracy with every new law passed by Parliament and each regulation introduced by the government. For a long time, the ruling party has given up bothering to look democratic and respect the rule of law.

The kind of a regime that the ruling AKP is trying to establish has nothing to do with democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Erdoğan’s is an authoritarian regime justified and popularized by religious symbolism and monopolized by the AKP.

The March local elections may be the last exit for Turkey before a long and dark reign of the Erdoğan regime that will be neither conservative nor democratic.

Source: Todays Zaman , February 23, 2014


Related News

Koza gold firm starts up company in UK

The gold company, whose owner Akın İpek is known to have close ties with Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen’s Hizmet (Service) movement, has been hit by the suspension of several of its mining fields.

Gülen’s lawyer: Views other than state ideology considered a crime in Turkey

Nurullah Albayrak, the lawyer of prominent Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, has criticized the blocking of herkul.org, a website that regularly broadcasts speeches by Gülen, saying views that are different from the state ideology are considered a crime in Turkey today.

Prime Ministry asks president to purge ‘parallel state’ in his office

The Office of the Prime Minister has submitted a list of people who are allegedly members of the Hizmet movement to President Abdullah Gül, the Taraf daily claimed on Thursday, as part of widespread government attacks on the movement.

Was prime minister able to convince the EU?

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan makes all of his political reinforcement in the judicial system. He uses all his political power, charisma and charm to block the corruption probes. For this reason, instead of convincing the EU, he tries to secure a temporary peace so that he can finish his job.

Ex-diplomats detained over Gülen links subjected to severe torture, says deputy

Some 20 former employees of the Turkish Foreign Ministry who were among 100 detained last week are being subjected to heavy torture, according to claims raised by a member of the Turkish Parliament.

Separation politics and Islam makes Gülen AKP’s enemy

“The Gülen Movement is faith inspired in its motivation, but faith neutral in its manifestation.” That is how key speaker Ozcan Keles, chairperson of Dialogue Society in London, characterized the Gülen Movement in a panel discussion on the Hizmet Movement Tuesday in the European Parliament.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

PKK terrorists set dorm on fire, one student injured

Today’s Zaman praised for quality coverage on 6th anniversary

CSOs continue to condemn hate speech against Hizmet movement

Turkish schools open up trade channels too

Gülenist refugees from Turkey start over in U.S.

Gülen condemns Pakistan attack, asks Muslims to protect minorities

Turkey Coup Attempt Explained

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News