Freedom House says security package undermines democracy in Turkey

Lawmakers from the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) hold up the photos of children allegedly killed by security forces during a debate on the controversial security bil at the Parliament on Feb. 19. (Photo: AP)
Lawmakers from the pro-Kurdish Peoples' Democratic Party (HDP) hold up the photos of children allegedly killed by security forces during a debate on the controversial security bil at the Parliament on Feb. 19. (Photo: AP)


Date posted: February 24, 2015

US-based watchdog Freedom House has criticized Turkey’s controversial security package, which grants extensive powers to police officersand provincial governors, saying that the passing of the bill in Parliament is a move to undermine democracy in Turkey.

Freedom House, which describes itself as “an independent watchdog organization dedicated to the expansion of freedom around the world,” responded to the passage of the first 10 articles, issuing a statement late Monday.

The director of Freedom House’s Eurasia programs, Susan Corke, said, “It is no exaggeration to say that the future of Turkish democracy hangs in the balance with this law.”

Corke also pointed out that “the new legislation undermines the accountability and oversight of police and prosecutors as well as citizens’ trust in these principles, which are at the core of democracy and rule of law.”

“The legislation will eviscerate critical checks on search and detention, while exacerbating the problem of politically-appointed governors overseeing police operations. Widening the scope of when police may use firearms against protesters is dangerous and out of step with UN guidelines on the use of force by law enforcement,” Corke added.

Ten articles of the 132-article bill were passed after midnight on Saturday. The bill allows police officers to wiretap telephones for 48 hours before a court order is issued. The police will need to submit a request for a wiretap within 24 hours, but the judge is only required to deliver a judgment on the issue within 48 hours. Currently, a judge needs to rule on the issue within 24 hours. Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu has defended the bill, claiming that it is in harmony with EU norms.

The main aim of the bill, according to the government — which has been pushing to pass it — is to prevent public order from being disrupted by illegal demonstrations and to maintain public security. The government claims that those who oppose the bill want the use of Molotov cocktails to go unpunished, although the claim was previously denied by opposition parties.

Six more articles of the controversial bill were passed late on Monday after Freedom House issued its statement criticizing the bill.

Turkey has a history of performing poorly in Freedom House reports. In its “Freedom in the World 2015” report Turkey was rated “partly free,” “partly free” in the “Freedom on the Net 2014” report and“not free” in the “Freedom of the Press 2014” report.

Source: Today's Zaman , February 24, 2015


Related News

Deputy PM threatens Taraf daily, Baransu for covering controversial MGK docs

Deputy Prime Minister Bülent Arınç on Monday called on prosecutors to take legal action against the Taraf daily and journalist Mehmet Baransu, who last week revealed a controversial National Security Council (MGK) document indicating that Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party) signed on to a planned crackdown on the Hizmet (Gülen) movement in 2004.

Turkey, ‘The Devil’s Advocate’ and ‘Titanic’

Questions to challenge the primary and unjustified premise: What judicial (or other) process determined that these corruption investigations were a coup attempt against the government? What proof or evidence do you have to support this most serious claim? What disciplinary process did you undertake to determine that the people that were purged were members and culprits of this ‘coup’? In the absence of evidence and disciplinary process how did you determine these people’s association with Hizmet? When is government corruption not a judicial coup? How can you have the right to unilaterally determine the intent and purpose of these ongoing judicial investigations when your government is implicated in them? If your government can purge over 7,000 police officers (and thereby affect and prevent these investigations) without evidence, due process or disciplinary procedure, do you not set a precedent for every future potentially corrupt government to follow?

Erdogan: A Classic Case Of How Power Corrupts

To consolidate his reign, Turkey’s president Mr. Erdogan intimidated his political opponents, emasculated the military, silenced the press, and enfeebled the judiciary; most recently, he pressed the parliament to amend the constitution to grant him essentially absolute powers.

TUSKON: Twitter ban a disappointment in information age

Turkish Confederation of Businessmen and Industrialists (TUSKON) Chairman Rıza Nur Meral voiced his disappointment on Friday over the decision by the ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party), which tries to attract voters with promises of democracy, more human rights, increased rule of law and reforms to gain EU membership, to block access to Twitter.

MEP: International investigation into Turkey’s rule of law needed

Schaake stated: “The separation of powers is under immense pressure in Turkey and the rule of law is not upheld. This crisis also impacts the relations between the European Union and Turkey, because measures taken, such as political intervention with the judicial branch, are not in line with European rules. The independence of the judiciary has been a concern for Europe for much longer.

Kimse Yok Mu meets Syrian refugees’ needs through sister families

CİHAN ACAR, ŞANLIURFA Some of the urgent needs of Syrian refugees who have being sheltering in the southeastern region of Turkey since they fled from the intensifying violence in Syria are being met by the “sister family” project organized by the Kimse Yok Mu (Is Anybody There) charity foundation. Syrian refugees in Turkey, whose numbers […]

Latest News

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

After Reunion: A Quiet Transformation Within the Hizmet Movement

Erdogan’s Failed Crusade: The World Rejects His War on Hizmet

Fethullah Gulen – man of education, peace and dialogue – passes away

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

In Case You Missed It

Officials involved in illegal deportation of Turkish teachers indicted by Kosovar court

Rumi Forum bestows Peace and Dialogue awards 2013

Plot against Gülen movement in tatters as suspects confess to false testimony

Human rights associations up in arms over deputy’s remarks on torture allegations

Slanders against Hizmet Movement at highest level, which offends Anatolians

Post-coup purge victim says he may never be a father due to torture in prison

Bal asks whether Erdoğan is trying to suppress religious communities

Copyright 2025 Hizmet News