Turkish PM Erdoğan’s chain of mistakes

Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
Turkish PM Recep Tayyip Erdoğan


Date posted: December 26, 2013

Isa Eraslan

Although a wonderful picture has been drawn by the media which is close to the government, recently in Turkey things have not been ticking along. Turkey, the foreign policy theses of which have completely collapsed, is in a state of total isolation in the region.

These days, just like everyone else, I also have difficulty in understanding the tension which the country has been dragged into. How come we have touched the bottom unexpectedly and witnessed first the Gezi Park protests and then the prep school protests? In particular, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s confronting the Hizmet movement — with which he has been a close ally along Turkey’s democratization journey since 2002 — indicates that a serious mistake has been made. In this matter hundreds of comments have been written from different perspectives. If the country has been polarized to this extent, the situation should also be evaluated from Erdoğan’s leadership perspective. Did the situation get more serious and bigger because of Erdoğan’s mistake? Why did Erdoğan make a faux pas this time?

In order to understand this question I reread the great book of Sun Tzu, “The Art of War.” Although Erdoğan is accepted as a high-profile, smart and charismatic leader, what went wrong this time? Let’s see what Sun Tzu says on this matter.

While reading the book in order to detect the flow of events, the most striking statement I encountered was this: “There are roads which must not be followed, armies which must be not be attacked, towns which must not be besieged, and positions which must not be contested.” Erdoğan’s most serious problem is this. Based on the fact that he has come out successful in every crisis he has encountered, he always uses the same strategy to overcome difficulties. I call this the “curse of winning every battle.” Until this year, Erdoğan has almost always won his battles. He has defeated the opposition in every election since 2002 and he was able to send the army to its barracks. Today, he is serving as the head of the most powerful government in Turkey’s history. For this very reason, Erdoğan and his followers think that he is undefeatable. That’s why he never does the things that need to be done before entering into a battle. In order to clarify what I mean I go to Sun Tzu again: “If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.” Erdoğan doesn’t do a cost-and-benefit analysis of the fights he enters and he even doesn’t try to analyze the strength of his opponents and attacks them thoughtlessly. When he realizes that he will sustain more harm than his opponents, it might be too late.

Another serious mistake of Erdoğan’s is that he turns the problems he is unable to solve into existential crises. As he doesn’t have even a shadow of toleration for a step back, he binds the problems to foreign intervention, the interest lobby, dark forces, parallel inner state circles, Israel and the US and claims that the only aim of this opposition is to destroy the AK Party and destabilize Turkey. The people who don’t want to give up the stability that came with the AK Party period feel themselves obliged to support Erdoğan voluntarily or involuntarily. Although this tactic brings a short-term victory, in the long run it inflicts a deep wound within the society. Erdoğan will definitely understand that although his tactic would bring victories in the short run, they are like the Pyrrhic Victory which causes the devastation of both sides, and maybe he will also say that “another such victory and I come back to Epirus alone,” as the Greek King Pyrrhus said. His pride is overshadowing his reason and this causes great damage to the country.

To sum up, Erdoğan is a great warrior but not a great leader because he doesn’t know where to stop. As his pride overshadows his reason he considers winning battles as equal to having success, whereas even winning 100 battles may not mean you win the war. Despite winning many battles, Germany couldn’t win WWII. Hannibal could almost always win his battles but he lost the war with Rome. Napoleon’s end was not different than that of the others.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 26, 2013


Related News

Who speaks for Islam in Turkey?

Huseyin Gulerce voiced deep concern about Erdogan’s criticism of Fethullah Gulen “as a fake prophet” at a meeting of the Religious Affairs Directorate. Gulerce asked, “Would not the stability of the country be harmed if the mosques are polarized as such?” He concluded that politics have dominated religion.

Countdown for operation against Hizmet Movement

Even though the government has already removed from duty thousands of people, including police officers and members of the judiciary, it would have difficulties persuading “civil servants” to launch an operation against the community [Hizmet movement].

The ‘other’ interview

The difference between a good leader and a transformational leader is the latter’s openness to being challenged, as they get a chance to showcase their talent, thinking and tasks.

Government blocks bank accounts of aid organization

The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government’s efforts to disrupt the work of Turkey’s leading aid organization Kimse Yok Mu (Is Anybody There) continues with the unlawful blocking of the organization’s bank accounts on Oct. 22.

GYV praised for response to accusations about Hizmet movement

FATMA DİŞLİ ZIBAK, ALİ ASLAN KILIÇ, İSTANBUL/ANKARA An 11-article statement released by the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) on Tuesday in response to a series of controversial claims and slanderous accusations made about the Hizmet movement has received appreciation and applause from many who said the statement is a good response to those who wish […]

Another ‘coup suspect’ found dead in Turkish prison, bringing total to 21

At least 21 people have reportedly committed suicide either after they were imprisoned over ties to the movement or after being linked to the movement outside prison. The relatives of most of them claim that the detainees are not the kind of people to commit suicide, shedding doubt on the official narrative. Rumours also have it that some of the detainees were killed after being subjected to torture under custody.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Civil war in Mali did not discourage the Turkish school teachers

Source claims US not probing into Gulenists’ alleged role in Russian ambassador’s murder

Is Hizmet being subjected to genocide?

Turkish Cultural Center Holds Annual Friendship Dinner

‘I like the vitality of the participation and the vitality of hospitality within the Hizmet Movement’

New Book – “Beginnings and Endings: Fethullah Gülen’s Vision for Today’s World”

UN to Turkey: Free and Compensate Gulen-linked Detainees

Copyright 2024 Hizmet News