Laughter-guaranteed terrorist organization indictment

Bulent Korucu
Bulent Korucu


Date posted: April 11, 2015

Have you ever bought anything from peddlers on ferries?

With exaggerated details, they explain that they will sell the bottle of “miraculous” liquid they produce from their bags only for TL 100. After a brief bargaining, they put the bottle in your hands only for TL 5. When you get home, you understand that it was nothing but tap water mixed with essence and you get enraged. The case of those who attempt to indict the Gülen (Hizmet) movement, inspired by well-respected Turkish-Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, is like that of those peddlers. They have started the bargaining with the most serious charges, but end up with “car theft.” If you think I’m kidding, you’re wrong!

I’m talking about the indictment the Ankara 2nd High Criminal Court recently accepted. In the indictment prepared by the Bureau of Crimes Against Constitutional Order at the Ankara Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, it was claimed that the defendants had committed the crimes with which they are charged with “in order to prevent the organization of which they are members from being neutralized and purged from the state, to give the impression that the state is in need of the members of the ‘parallel state’ [a term frequently used by government officials about the Hizmet movement] to prove that recently appointed state officials are incompetent, to take revenge on the government and to show that recently appointed public officials will be unable to combat crime syndicates sufficiently.” In a country where a director of public security gets his cellphone stolen by bag­-snatchers and terrorists whose photos were published in papers can freely raid courthouses or open fire in a courthouse, is there any extra effort needed to commit the above-mentioned crime of “giving the impression that recently appointed public officials are incompetent”?

This tragicomic reasoning reminded me of an equally funny incident related years ago by famed Turkish actor Cüneyt Arkın. In one film, Arkın escapes from prison. As he is running away, he bumps into a prison guard, sending him to one side and his hat to the other. Then, public authorities censored the film on charges of “giving the impression that public officials are incompetent.” What is the difference?

Even the incident in question occurred in bizarre way. They stole and sold the police car parked in front of the house of a police officer. Thus, they conducted a “terrorist act by portraying the state as incompetent”! Who carried out this act? The police officer’s colleagues who had the spare key, i.e., the people who were already authorized to use the car. The only piece of evidence for this act is the call made from a payphone by an unidentified person. However, it is known that the complainant police officer had delivered the car to the mafia upon threats.

A brief search on the Internet reveals the activities of a person called Kadir İnan. So what shows that the people who are made part of this gang are members of the so-called “parallel structure”? It is a CD containing sermons and the reasoning by the public prosecutor. The reasoning of the prosecutor is as follows: “The defendant worked at all critical missions of the National Police Department and [Seyit] Akşit … couldn’t conduct the surveillance if he wasn’t a member of this structure.” However, many people who were working at the Intelligence Unit were later promoted. The most extreme example is Engin Dinç, the head of the intelligence unit. Based on this unique manner of reasoning, everyone who was working at that department at that time, including Dinç, must be sent to jail.

The following sentence from the indictment means that the prosecutor refutes not only himself but also the entire judicial system: “The only body authorized to decide if any organization is a terrorist organization is the Terrorism Unit of the National Police Department.” If this is the case, then we must shut down courts so that the Financial Crimes Unit can decide if an act is corruption or the Smuggling Unit should decide if someone is a smuggler and so on. In this way, we can build shopping malls in place of courthouses. In particular, the İstanbul Courthouse may be given to Mehmet Cengiz.

The weird judicial practices are not restricted to these. Three benefactors aged 90, 77 and 73, respectively, who were executives of an association building a mosque in Sincan, have been detained. They are charged with building mosques, complexes and imam-hatip schools. The municipal council had changed the zoning. An investigation was conducted into the members of the municipal council and they were found not guilty. But those who built a mosque and an imam-hatip school after that zoning change were detained. Someone is offended when we liken the current process to the post-modern coup of Feb. 28, 1997.

Source: Today's Zaman


Related News

Erdoğan…a factionist PM?

Now that the prime minister is battling a corruption scandal for which he is blaming the Hizmet movement, his new victims are Fethullah Gülen’s followers, who he calls “traitors.”

What does religion have to do with corruption?

The ongoing graft investigation, which hit the press on Dec. 17 with a major police operation resulting in the arrest of 24 suspects — including prominent business figures and the sons of two ministers — sparked a public discussion on the links between politics and Islam, as a majority of the members of the ruling party present themselves as devout Muslims.

Hiring based on ‘color lists’ a violation of Constitution, analysts say

A public sector employee selection process using personal data to create “color lists” that profiled and separated the candidates into acceptable and non-acceptable categories, as was recently maintained by the Taraf daily, is a violation of the Constitution, analysts have agreed.

The AKP as a party: Is it Islamic, statist or just opportunist?

The situation is tense these days in Turkey between the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Gülen movement.

Smear campaign against Gülen today harsher than in Feb. 28 era

Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, who has inspired a worldwide religious network that defends peaceful coexistence through dialogue and education, is currently being targeted in a government-sponsored smear campaign that is reminiscent of, and even harsher than, the Feb. 28, 1997 coup period.

US under Trump still highly unlikely to extradite Gülen

National War College professor Taşpınar says extradition remains unlikely because Ankara has presented no concrete evidence directly implicating him in the coup attempt. “I think what [Washington] should do is to basically tell the Turks they need a smoking gun. They need much clearer evidence, which is not there yet,” he says

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Albanian president to Erdoğan: Turkish schools pose no threat

Gülen: Smear campaign targets those promoting Turkish culture

Interfaith Ramadan Iftar Dinner Held in Montville

A serious question for a respected newspaper

86-year-old Gülen-linked philanthropist arrested on terror (!) charges

Turkish charity Kimse Yok Mu opens two orphanages in Burundi

Rule of law(lessness) in Turkey?

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News