33rd Abant Platform: whither Turkey?

The 33rd Abant Platform meeting was held in Akçakoca, Bolu province, to discuss
The 33rd Abant Platform meeting was held in Akçakoca, Bolu province, to discuss "Turkey's direction," hosted by the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) On June 20-22. (Photo:Today's Zaman)


Date posted: June 28, 2014

OĞUZHAN TEKİN

On June 20-22, the 33rd Abant Platform meeting was held in Akçakoca, Bolu province, to discuss “Turkey’s direction,” hosted by the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV). More than 100 intellectuals all over the world, including prominent scholars, journalists, NGO leaders and former politicians, attended the meeting.In his speech at the opening of the first session, Prof. Seyfettin Yuksel said: “If it had been said a few years ago that we would be discussing ‘Turkey’s direction’ in the coming years, none of us would have believed it. We were sure about Turkey’s direction.” Unfortunately, nowadays Turkey’s direction is seen as uncertain, and the country has strayed not only from its foreign policy but also from democratic norms and the rule of law in its domestic policies. Here are my notes from the conference.

On foreign policy

All intellectuals who joined the conference agreed that Turkey needs to turn its face towards the European Union for democratization. In order to be an important player in the Middle East, Turkey should cooperate with the EU in its foreign policy.

For the last two years, Turkey has not been represented at the ambassadorial level in the major capitals of the Middle Eastern countries, which are Cairo, Damascus and Tel Aviv. This absence of formal representation, along with Turkey’s sectarian-centered foreign policy approach, has led to isolation in the region. While the Middle East is undergoing a new transformation with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) invasions, Turkey needs to reform its regional policy as well as its global foreign policy parameters.

The rhetoric and comments of government members no longer conform with diplomatic language. For example, anti-Western rhetoric about the invisible hand of Western powers and conspiracy theories that blame the EU and US have damaged Turkey’s perception. This has decreased Turkey’s credibility in the major European capitals and Washington.

Therefore, in its foreign policy, Turkey should keep the channels of diplomacy permanently open and be prudent about its diplomatic rhetoric.

Turkey’s soft power is much more effective than hard power. Turkey’s democracy, equality before the law and respect for freedom and rights are the basis of its attractiveness. An authoritarian Turkey is not an inspiring example or model for the Middle East.

Political participation

Politics is not an area limited exclusively to politicians. Citizens have the right to be involved in politics through any means and modes. Inviting critics to form a political party or blaming them for carrying out “unregistered politics” are unacceptable. Creating a perception for ordinary citizens that “politics can only be done by political parties” and producing propaganda such as “businesspeople, the youth and professionals must be concerned with their own business, not politics” is a very wrong approach for participatory democracy.

Polls do not remove accountability to citizens; election times are not the only time in which politicians are accountable; ballot boxes cannot be presented as court decisions. Elections are not only tools for democracy; authoritarian and totalitarian regimes use elections too. Democracy is separated from them by transparency and freedom of information.

Politicians are responsible for their actions to their citizens at all times. Citizens have the right to protect their rights and freedoms defined in the Constitution 24/7 through political participation. The channels of political participation must be open all the time.

Instead of Ankara criteria and norms, Copenhagen (EU) norms should be implemented for a peaceful Turkey.

Majoritarian policies damage social cohesion and peace. Therefore, a pluralistic understanding and approach should prevail in policy making.

Final remarks

Many of the attendees expressed that the government’s authoritarian tendencies and actions will not change in the near future. There is no hope for pluralistic and participatory democracy soon.

As long as the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) does not have sufficient seats in Parliament to change the Constitution, it will continue to protect at least the fundamental rights of citizens and Turkey’s regime, a prominent constitutional professor said.

When I arrived home after the event, my wife told me that the government does not care what we discussed or what we announced in the final declaration. I told her that in democracies there are many ways to voice your concerns about politics and policies. This is one of them.

The government supporters are sufficiently not aware of the government’s majoritarian and exclusive policies that empowering polarization and unrest in the country. Due to the government’s media cartel prevails among the supporters; they do not access objective information.  Most probably all citizens including the government supporters will agree the advices, which are pluralistic and based on EU standards, prepared by those attending, with their different ideological backgrounds, as long as they find a way to access it.

Indeed, the government prefers citizens to sit down and shut up in their home and not talk about politics. Thank to the organizers we have intellectuals who are aware that politics is an important business that cannot be left solely to politicians.

The full statement of the final declaration can be read at: http://tinyurl.com/khs49r9

Source: Todays Zaman , June 25, 2014


Related News

Who stalls the reforms [in Turkey]?

ABDÜLHAMİT BİLİCİ “A group of people, including businessmen, students and teachers who came all the way from Thailand, traveling 9,000 kilometers to cast their votes in the referendum (on September 12, 2010), are now back to Thailand. Neşet Kahraman, who spent $2,000 on travel in order to cast his vote, said: ‘The referendum was pretty […]

Why didn’t Chuck Hagel visit Turkey?

The government took new measures to prevent the graft probe from proceeding, in an attempt to create the public perception that the corruption allegations are the making of the Hizmet movement and its alleged foreign collaborators. For instance, a new measure introduced by the government to tighten control over the Internet, including powers allowing the authorities to block websites for privacy violations without a court decision, is part of a campaign to prevent news related to the corruption scandal from being disseminated further through the Internet.

Fethullah Gulen’s Dialogue

In the contextual theology of Gulen, faith is always translated into action in light of the pressing needs of a given society. Islam, thus, becomes a language to speak about human needs and concerns as much as the content of these beliefs are shaped and understood by the prevailing context.

Recent poll on Hizmet movement

DR. DOĞU ERGİL, April 24, 2012 The MetroPOLL Strategic and Social Research Center conducted a nationwide survey during the last week of March and the first week of April. The topics polled included the clash between the Gülen community and the National Intelligence Organization (MİT). The number of respondents who believe the Gülen community wants to […]

25 World Rights Groups Demand Turkey Scrap Emergency Rule

At least 25 leading international rights groups in various fields, human rights and media, have called for an end to certain measures of emergency rule in Turkey, warning against gross human rights violations and endangering the basic tenets of democracy and the rule of law.

Erdoğan’s imaginary power struggles

When we look at international media coverage of the recent corruption scandal in Turkey, we see that the events are generally seen as a “power struggle” between the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government and the Hizmet movement.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

28th Abant Meeting “Diverse Perspectives on Turkey” to be held in February 2013

Fethullah Gülen’s Statement of Condolences and Condemnation for Manhattan Terrorist Attack

Businesses link to increase Pakistan-Turkey bilateral trade

The fall of democracy and predicament of political Islam in Turkey

Der Spiegel’s recent strange attack on the Hizmet (Gulen) Movement

The businessman who sits on his cell phone to avoid wiretapping

Fethullah Gulen in 2 minutes

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News