Division at home, cooperation abroad


Date posted: December 7, 2013

JOOST LAGENDIJK

Last week I visited Canada to speak at a panel on Turkey in Ottawa and give a lecture on Turkey-EU relations at the Munk School for Global Affairs in Toronto. The panel was part of the first Turkic-Canadian Convention intended to boost economic and cultural relations between Canada and Turkey. The convention was organized by the Anatolian Heritage Federation and was also attended by five members of the Turkish Parliament from the three major parties.

The panel went fine, although the Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputies could not appreciate my critical comments on the way the government had handled the Gezi Park protests, and the outreach of the convention to Canadian politicians and businessmen was successful.

What struck me most, however, during my Ottawa visit was the welcome reception that was organized for us in the Anatolian Cultural Centre that had been opened officially only one month before. I was impressed by the traditional kindness and hospitality of our hosts but also by the self-sacrifice and spirit of cooperation on display by the local, mainly Turkish migrants who had set up this center. In talking to them it became crystal clear how important the center is for the Turkish community in Ottawa to meet other Turks and share experiences, but also to use it as a platform to invite Canadians from other beliefs and convictions and show them what Turkey and Turks have to offer.

This combination of cherishing your own common history and at the same time setting up a dialogue with your fellow Canadians with a different background is what makes these kinds of centers all over North America such special places.

I am sure most of the Canadian Turks present that evening share some basics but probably disagree on other issues, such as political preferences, as well. Their willingness to cooperate across ideological borders contradicts sharply with the polarization between similar groups and persons that we can witness in Turkey these days. I asked several people that evening how they assessed the nasty row between the Turkish government and the Hizmet Movement on a growing list of topics, now focused on prep schools. It turned out, not surprisingly, that most of the persons I spoke to had voted AKP in the past and have warm feelings for the Hizmet Movement. It was obvious they were torn between their political affiliation and their social, cultural and religious preferences. None of them could understand why the ruling party was provoking such a clash between two sides that, in their perception, both had a big interest in sticking together in the unfinished struggle for a more democratic Turkey.

Their bottom line: Why are politicians in Ankara not able to do what we, Turkish Canadians, are practicing daily: Focus on communalities and accept differences?

There is one Canadian anecdote I do not want to withhold from you. In August 2011, I wrote a column in this newspaper about the book “How Happy to Call Oneself a Turk,” written by Gavin D. Brockett, an associate professor of Middle East and Islamic History at Wilfrid Laurier University in Kitchener, Canada. That article was read by Engin Sezen and his wife, both Turkish historians living in Canada who at that moment were looking for a job. They did not know Brockett or his book about the construction of the Turkish identity but were intrigued by the column and decided to contact Brockett to discuss that topic and other related issues. After some time they got together and one year ago Engin and his wife both got a job offer from Laurier University. When, only one week ago, Engin heard I would be visiting Toronto, one hour drive from Kitchener, he contacted the organizers and set up a last-minute meeting for me to speak about Turkey in that small university city. I only heard his remarkable story in which my column had played such a crucial role when we met in Kitchener last Wednesday and went for lunch together with Brockett. I can’t stop smiling when I tell others about this story of an article and its unintended consequences on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 8, 2013


Related News

Ayan: Halkbank operated like Iran’s Central Bank

“The extent of this operation is far beyond the reach of the cemaat [the Hizmet movement],” [“The extent of this operation is far beyond the reach of the cemaat [the Hizmet movement],” Famous Turkish investor Nasrullah Ayan said. He thinks, rather, that powerful international groups could have pulled the trigger or provided technical support to the probe. He pointed to the fact that the operation was launched after the agreement between Iran and the P5+1 nations in Geneva — which gave Iran partial relief from a harsh regime of

Human rights associations up in arms over deputy’s remarks on torture allegations

In an open letter to the Turkish Parliament, six Turkey-based human rights associations on Thursday criticized recent remarks of ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) deputy Mehmet Metiner, who said the government would ignore allegations of torture and mistreatment if victims were sympathizers of the Gülen movement.

[Press Release] The Corruption and Slander against the Hizmet Movement

Prime Minister marketed the historic graft investigation as a “coup against the government” and he targeted the Hizmet movement by voicing this claim first in the pro-government media outlets and then in the election rallies along with a host of unthinkable lies and slanders.

Gulen Movement And Transparency

The transparency of the Hizmet or Gülen Movement has long been a theme of various critics – writers, intellectuals and politicians. In the context of Turkey where secularism is deployed as a means to control religion rather than to separate it from politics, it is not hard to understand why this theme has been so popular.

America Shouldn’t Give up Fethullah Gülen to Turkey

Erdoğan played the failed coup rather like Adolf Hitler used the Reichstag fire: as a fortuitous opportunity to crush critics as well as enemies. Indeed, there were suggestions that the Erdoğan government was aware of the plot but chose to allow plotters to proceed in hopes of reaping political gain.

Can the West believe in Islamic progress?

This means the [Gulen] movement’s Islamic core is intertwined with an internalization of Western Weberian and Calvinist worldviews, highlighting the interconnectedness of religious principles and economic applications, believing, in the spirit of Capitalism, that socioeconomic prosperity is the most favorable way to bring about and reflect God’s pleasure.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Unmasking Turkey’s most wanted man

Yes, Love Is a Verb!

Erdogan’s war on education: The exodus of Turkey’s teachers

Preparations for Turkish Olympiads begin in Morocco

Reaction mounts against PM’s witch-hunt remarks

Hate towards Hizmet Movement as a political strategy

Iftar Dinner at Manhattan’s Riverside Church

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News