The dangers of demonization [of Hizmet movement]


Date posted: December 19, 2013


[AK Party] Government supporters have accused the Hizmet movement of aiming to discredit a number of ministers and their relatives.

The claim relates to a recent investigation into alleged bribery in public tenders, which saw the sons of three Cabinet ministers taken into custody alongside construction moguls and bureaucrats. In televised interviews and tweets from their personal accounts, figures close to government circles claimed that the Hizmet movement was behind the police operation.

These figures have been running a smear campaign against the Hizmet movement for some time. Their efforts extend beyond simple criticism. For them, the movement is behind every police operation — indeed any legal process — since, as they claim, many Hizmet-affiliated officials work within the ranks of the police force and judiciary.

Given the Turkish tradition of deifying the state and demonizing any force that shares its territory, this is understandable. The Justice and Development Party (AK Party) was itself victimized as an anti-establishment party. Parties linked to the Milli Görüş (National View) tradition, which eventually gave birth to the AK Party, were closed down by the Constitutional Court on the grounds that they had a secret agenda to overthrow the established regime. This paranoia about civilian power centers is part of the Sèvres Syndrome that has haunted the statesmen of Turkey throughout the republic’s history.

As the AK Party (wrongly) believes that it has captured the castles of the state, it has in turn adopted those classic defensive strategies. It will not permit the existence of any civilian power center that does not bow before the power of the state.

These are the understandable — albeit unacceptable — reflexes of a paranoid state with centralist tendencies. But the demonization of a civilian power center may have repercussions. Attributing every police operation and every decision from prosecutors to a particular social movement may indeed have a negative effect in the initial stages. But in the long run, society may develop a type of Stockholm Syndrome in which demonization ultimately creates sympathy between society and the target group. In the end, the hit men of the AK Party may find that they have triggered growing social interest through the Hizmet movement.

Claiming that the movement controls the police force and legal apparatus is another way of saying, “We cannot control our own police and prosecutors.” This is neither true nor desirable. Yesterday, we saw the government replace five police chiefs in charge of the anti-graft operation which had been ordered by the Chief Prosecutor’s Office. The Supreme Board of Judges and Prosecutors (HSYK) then appointed two extra prosecutors to the cases, as was apparently requested by the minister of justice — a move that will dilute the investigation’s power. The government is in full control of the police force and has an unacceptable level of power within the legal apparatus. In contrast, creating the impression that the Hizmet movement has the capacity to organize operations against Cabinet ministers is hardly constructive.

Some months ago, a government-controlled newspaper ran a story claiming that the prime minister’s office had been wiretapped by Iranian agents. The story’s aim was to show that the prime minister is still a victim of “others.” But its impact was counterproductive: Turkish society saw only weakness in the government. The next day, the same newspaper claimed that deep-state organs had hired a group of professional assassins to kill the prime minister, adding that the group was still operational. The impact was once again counterproductive.

Turkish society supported the AK Party because it managed to create a sense of security and stability. It was in control of the economy, in control of the army and in control of foreign policy. The AK Party strategists should not generate lies about the Hizmet movement which create an image of government weakness. Instead of making direct or indirect accusations against a civil society group that has no real control over any state body, the government should simply come out and declare that everything is under control.

Demonization is merely another form of deification. The Hizmet movement rejects both, and the government should do the same.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 18, 2013

Related News

What Is Next In Turkey?

The generals were never the script writers of the coups but only players. The script writers of the coup on July 15 in Turkey aimed to simulate a coup as if it was staged by the Gulen movement. It was simply a false flag. While only a few hundred soldiers were involved in the coup, more than ten thousand officers were purged and arrested. While the police officers challenged the coup plotters, twelve thousand police officers were fired two months after the coup.

Turkey warns Kazakhstan over Gulen-linked schools

Astana (Kazakhstan) (AFP) – Turkey’s ambassador to Kazakhstan on Friday warned the Central Asian country over its schools linked to US-based preacher Fethullah Gulen, whom the Turkish government blames for this month’s coup attempt.

Irvine’s new arrivals — Turkish asylum seekers, after a failed coup and a sadly successful purge

The man, who ran a nonprofit that provided humanitarian aid, doesn’t want to be identified because he fears for the safety of the wife and two children he was forced to leave in Turkey. They are hidden in a different city, he said, not far from his hometown. They’ve thrown away their cellphones and erased their social media accounts for fear of being tracked down by a government that no longer welcomes them.

Crimes Against Humanity in Erdogan’s Turkey

The seventh stage [of genicide] is “Preparation.” Erdogan and his supporters direct violent phrases at Hizmet participants, including “they will not have access to food and water” and “they will beg us to kill them to avoid torture.” Widespread propaganda calls Hizmet participants “assassins,” “terrorists” or pawns of foreign powers such as the CIA, Mossad or the Vatican.

Gülen’s lawyer files criminal complaint against several Twitter accounts

In the criminal complaint, which was filed at the Ankara Public Prosecutor’s Office, it was written that suspects were claimed to have committed a crime by “tapping phone calls, and [making] audio and visual recordings [of] Mr. Gülen illegally.”

UK court rejects ‘politically motivated’ Turkish extradition request of businessman

John Zani, district judge at London’s Westminster Magistrates’ Court, declined Turkey’s request, expressing “serious reservations about the current state of the rule of law in Turkey.”

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Turkish-Kyrgyz educator’s abduction shows Ankara’s ruthless disregard for law: HRW

PakTurk School holds language & cultural festival

Students of Fatih Schools take first place in LYS and TEOG exams

Kimse Yok Mu hosts international experts for social media benefits conference

The Hizmet movement and participatory democracy

MEP: International investigation into Turkey’s rule of law needed

Turkey is gateway to Europe: exporters urged to collaborate with Turkish companies

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News