Alevi problems deeper than they seem, opinion leaders agree


Date posted: December 13, 2013

ABANT, TURKEY

On the first day of the 30th Abant Platform meeting on Friday on the Alevis issue in Turkey, Alevi and Sunni intellectuals and opinion leaders agreed that the problems date back to centuries ago and are more complicated than they seem.

The event, titled “Searching for peace and a future together,” brought together representatives of various Alevi communities as well as Alevi and Sunni pundits, journalists and academics in an effort to have a comprehensive debate on one of the lingering problems of Turkish society.

The president of the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV), Mustafa Yeşil, emphasized the importance of the “love for the family of the Prophet,” which is considered significant among both Sunnis and Alevis. “It is a chain that ties us to each other. It is a remedy to our problems,” Yeşil commented, adding that the Alevi and Sunni faiths should not be made sources of conflict.

History professor Ahmet Yaşar Ocak, an expert on Alevi history, said Alevism has over a thousand-year-old history and could not be limited to descriptions such as loving the family of the Prophet or a different interpretation of Islam.

Yeşil emphasized the importance of the “Abant soul” that considers diversity a wealth since the Abant Platform traditionally bring people from opposite sides of the spectrum together on contentious issues. During his opening speech, Yeşil said, “It is very important for those who represent justice to be powerful and for those who are powerful to be just.”

Professor Ocak rejected defining Alevism as an issue in a negative connotation and said the problems stems from a state that has not been able to democratize itself. According to him, overlooking history is a wrong and misleading approach as history determines what happens today.

Dividing Alevi history into three — the Ottoman-Safavid state clash in the 16th century, the period up until the 20th century and the republican era — Professor Ocak said the vivid Alevi memory of massacre dates back to the killing of Alevis by Ottoman sultans during the war with the Safavids as they shared the same faith. The 16th century serves as a breaking point for Alevis as they isolated themselves from the Sunnis and lived along the periphery, according to Ocak.

Due to a sense of insecurity during the Ottoman Empire, Alevis strongly supported Mustafa Kemal Atatürk and the establishment of the republic with the hope of a comfortable life, Ocak says. However, they had two major disappointments with Atatürk: the exclusion of Alevis during the establishment of a state religious institution (the Religious Affairs Directorate) and the law banning religious orders in 1925.

With regards to Alevis as a minority, Professor İhsan Yılmaz from Fatih University said the understanding that minorities should make sacrifices for the majority is unacceptable.

A former deputy, Reha Çamuroğlu, also said Alevi problems have a long history because the sources of religious differences date back to 14 centuries ago. Expressing a bond with the Safavid state and its ruler, Shah Ismail, Çamuroğlu said he considers himself a descendant of Shah Ismail due to their common denominator, Turkishness. He noted that as many places in modern Turkey were under the rule of the Safavid state, his legacy remains.

On a similar note, the editor of Yol TV, Necdet Saraç, said he feels closer to Shah Ismail than to Yavuz Sultan Selim or to Kanuni (Süleyman the Magnificent), arguing that Ismail was much more Turk than the other two. According to him, the stars that symbolize the former Turkish states in history on the flag of office of the Presidency does not include the Safavid state although it was Turkish simply because it was an Alevi state.

In a striking statement, Saraç said “there is no thousand-year-long brotherhood between Alevis and Sunnis,” adding that the 16th century was magnificent only from the perspective of Sunnis. He called the Alevi issue society’s oldest issue.

Unlike many other prevalent statements that a cemevi (Alevi prayer house) is not an alternative to a mosque, Saraç said it is an alternative as it represents a different understanding. Like many other participants, he said it is impossible to ensure equality between Alevis and Sunnis unless the Religious Affairs Directorate is abolished.

Constitutional law professor Levent Köker also touched on the enormous budget of the Religious Affairs Directorate which is only allocated to Sunnis. He said to ensure equality, the state should grant an institutionalized status to religious communities which is only possible by drafting a new constitution.

The president of the Turkey-Europe Education and Scientific Research Foundation (TAVAK), Professor Faruk Şen, spoke about the status of the Turkish diaspora, which comprises 6.8 million people, and said there is a divergence between Alevis and Sunnis in the Turkish population in Germany. Giving examples from the German state, Şen said religious communities in Turkey should be able to manage their own budgets.

Professor Besim Dellaloğlu acknowledged a polarization in Turkey among different groups, including Alevis and Sunnis, and said people should be able to define cemevis however they perceive.

The speakers also agreed that Alevis began to urbanize at a later stage in modern Turkey. Professor Rıza Yıldırım said the emergence of urban Alevism is inevitable although it is difficult to keep some of their traditions while living in cities.

Journalist Şükrü Küçükşahin criticized the government’s Alevi opening, saying it is not possible to reach out to Alevis if one makes people boo Alevis in rallies in reference to one of the rallies held by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Dr. Doğan Kaplan from Necmettin Erbakan University mentioned news stories in the Turkish press about Alevi religious figures (dedes) taking trips to Iran, pointing out there is nothing wrong with visiting Iran since there are holy Shiite shrines there.

The Abant Platform is an independent think tank that takes its name from Lake Abant in the province of Bolu, the location of its first meeting. It is one of the most well known programs of the GYV. The GYV was founded in 1994. Its mission and work were inspired by the GYV’s honorary president, Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 13, 2013


Related News

76 newborns stateless as Turkey denies passports over parents’ Gülen links

Seventy-six babies have been born stateless in the last three months because Turkish diplomatic missions are denying consular services to people allegedly linked to the faith-based Gülen movement according to a report released by the Netherlands-based Institute on Statelessness and Inclusion (ISI) on Monday.

Ramadan Tent brings faiths together in Virginia

American Turkish Friendship Association (ATFA) held its annual Ramadan Tent on July 17-19 this year. The tent stayed up in the parking lot of Unity of Fairfax Church for 3 consecutive days and hosted approximately around 750 people each evening over Iftar Dinner. Asm. Kenneth Plum appreciates ATFA’s efforts to bring together people from different faiths and cultures.

Nigeria won’t allow mistreatment of her students by Turkey – Presidency

According to Dabiri-Erewa: “The Federal Government is taking the detention of Nigerian students by Turkish authorities seriously. It seems that Turkey is trying to get at Nigeria for our failure to close down the 17 schools they requested. The government did not close down these schools because their owners and managers, who are private people have not breached Nigerian laws.”

Scandalous return of Feb. 28

Hizmet movement lent full support to the AK Party in connection with critical issues such as the lawsuits against Ergenekon — a clandestine organization nested within the state trying to overthrow or manipulate the democratically elected government — and the e-memorandum of April 27, 2007.

The Hizmet movement and participatory democracy

The Hizmet movement’s objections make an important contribution to the formation of participatory democracy in Turkey. So far, Turkish democracy was a game among political parties in the absence of a strong civil society and market actors.

Did they make mistake?

We are experiencing a period of turmoil in which we strongly need the supremacy of law, the presumption of innocence and the individuality of criminal offenses. A grave campaign instead is being carried out to insult and denigrate millions of people. Why would the Hizmet movement consider forming a parallel state within the state given that its members hold no intention other than Allah’s will? Considering that democratic options are available for seeking positions within the state, why would people within the bureaucracy strive for greater political power?

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

[Part 1] Islamic scholar Gülen calls conditions in Turkey worse than military coup

Turkish NGO in Cambodia Denies Links to Terror

Erdoğanist Turks Target Inter-Cultural Dialogue Activities Of Gülen Followers In Germany

Turkey’s AKP planning to blame Hizmet movement for Deep State’s crimes

AfSV Message on the Shooting Incident in Jersey City on Tuesday

Pro-Erdoğan journalists call for assassination of Gülen followers abroad

Interior minister fails to answer questions on plot against Hizmet

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News