Final Declaration of “Coexistence in Islamic Civilizations and Contemporary Reviews” Conference

Date posted: December 28, 2012

In this century when “Alienation” has become a global and local syndrome of every society and the problems of “inability to coexist” have gained momentum, The Journalists and Writers Foundation Inter Cultural Dialogue Platform (IDP) and the Fatih University Civilizations Research and Application Center (CRAC) co-organized the “Coexistence in Islamic Civilization and Contemporary Reviews” International Conference on 7 to 8 December 2012 in Istanbul.

The conference participants included 50 speakers from 15 different countries. The conference concluded with a final declaration made up of very important items.The Final Decleration Delegation was made up of Chairman Prof. Dr. Suat Yildirim, Prof. Dr. Semir Budinar, Prof. Dr. Muhammad Babaammi, Assoc. Dr. Mustafa Buyer, Assoc. Dr. Ismail Taspinar, Dr. Margaret A. Johnson and Assoc. Dr. Suleyman Derin.

The Final Declaration of the  International Conference on “Coexistence in Islamic Civilization and Contemporary Reviews” was presented to the public as follows:

1- Contrary to the misguided-perception in the world, Islam is a religion of peace, forgiveness and tolerance. Islam contains the essential ingredients including peace for living together. It is the responsibility of every Muslim to represent Islam in the best way possible especially in countries, which have a prejudiced perception against Islam. We believe that if relevant action is not taken, the prejudices and wrong conceptions of Islam will be rooted in such countries,

2- Focusing on differences among each other instead of common values increases prejudgment and hatred among people,

3- That the “best role model” for Muslims Prophet Muhammed (MPUH*) was not sent just for Muslims but as a “Mercy for All Mankind”, should be explained to the rest of the world through dialogue,

4- With the “Medina Vesika”* which was a first for its kind, the roots of living together were established for people with different religious, ethnic and ideological backgrounds,

5- The value of establishing close relationships with other people in our era within the framework of the Holy Qur’an and the Sunnah** of Prophet Muhammed (MPUH)

6- Islam established itself with its own unique character in societies with different sociological, cultural backgrounds. It took civilization every where it was spread, Islam achieved this as a civilization on its own, and took civilization where ever it went.

7- Muslims take the Holy Quran, Sunnah and historical events as reference for guidance on how to live together with others,

8- Non-Muslims can’t be expected to learn Islam solely from books. Muslims have to reflect in their character what is written in the books,

9- The [Hizmet] Movement (aka Gulen movement) sees the entire world as a “place to serve humanity” and its efforts are for establishing tolerance and peace,

10- First and foremost that the “The Movement” and many other institutions and foundations around the world apply “The mentality of Living Together”. They have work in collaboration with each other and share their experiences in a new and dynamic spirit,

11- And With a paradigm appropriate for the modern ages, Mr.Fethullah Gulen has pointed out the importance of the “The dialogue person”. In that sense it is a need for every Muslim to be a “dialogue person”. We believe this is not a new concept, it is a fact derived from the practices of our Prophet Muhammed (MPUH).

We present for public consideration with respect.

Committee of the Final Declaration:

Prof. Dr. Suat Yıldırım, Prof. Dr. Semir Budinar, Prof. Dr. Muhammed Babaammi, Doç. Dr. Mustafa Alıcı, Doç. Dr. İsmail Taşpınar, Dr. Margaret A. Johnson, Doç. Dr. Süleyman Derin

* MGPH May God’s Peace be upon Him

* Sunnah The examples set by the Prophet Muhammed (MGPH) as reference for guidance

* Medina Vesika” An agreement made in Medina between peoples. It is also known as the “Constitution of Medina“.

Source: Intercultural Dialogue Platform December 8,  2012

Related News

Informant on Gülen movement members says he fabricated testimony to avoid jail time

İbrahim Demirtaş, a major in the Turkish military who testified as an informant in investigations into sympathizers of the faith-based Gülen movement, has admitted that his statements were false and made in order to avoid prosecution and jail time.

Gülen lawyers file complaint against prosecutors over wrongful probe

Lawyers representing Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen have filed a complaint against two İstanbul prosecutors who are conducting an investigation into their client, accusing them of violating procedural rules in the manner the probe is being conducted. The prosecutors have also lied on many occasions in writing, according to Gülen’s lawyers, who say that the prosecutors […]

Myanmar-based family abducted by Turkish embassy from Yangon airport

Myanmar-based education professional M. Furkan Sökmen and his family were detained yesterday at the Yangon International Airport while trying to board a flight to Bangkok. the teacher said the Turkish ambassador to Myanmar had pressured police to confiscate the family’s passports.

Let Mr. Erdogan Fight His Own Battles

Mr. Erdogan is trying to drag the United States into the argument by threatening to demand Mr. Gulen’s extradition to Turkey. Some experts say there is no legal basis for an extradition request because there are no charges or legal cases against Mr. Gulen, who has permanent-resident status and has lived in rural Pennsylvania since 1997.

Turkey: Democracy in peril – A human rights report

In a springtime of hope, the first decade of the 21st century, Turks and outside observers shared a dream that Turkey might become that bright star in an otherwise muddled constellation of the Middle East—a real democracy in a predominantly Muslim country, committed to civil liberty, human rights, pluralism, and civil society. That hope has disappeared as but a short- lived meteor in the dark, troubled sky. It is no more; and there is little optimism for its return in the foreseeable future. Turkey’s democracy is in regression.

Turkey’s permanent state of crisis

However, Erdogan has a problem: Whereas Ataturk came to power as a military general, Erdogan has a democratic mandate to govern. Ataturk’s Turkey was rural and only 10 percent of the country was literate at the time, with most educated people supporting his agenda. Erdogan’s Turkey is 80 percent urban and nearly 100 percent literate, and many well-educated Turks oppose his agenda.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Pulitzer Prize equals five years in prison in Turkey

Cemevi next to mosque embraced by residents in Malatya

Turkey’s New Constitution Would End Its Democracy

Turkish gov’t jailed not only journalist Karaca, but also his lawyers and the judges who ruled to release him

After 50 days, Turkish university director out of Malaysian jail with UN refugee card

The İmralı peace process and defaming the Hizmet movement

Understanding Fethullah Gülen (2)

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News