A rift between the Hizmet movement and the AK Party?

BÜLENT KENEŞ
BÜLENT KENEŞ


Date posted: June 14, 2012

BÜLENT KENEŞ June 14, 2012

For some time, Turkey has been obsessively talking about an alleged contention between the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Hizmet movement (aka Gulen Movement). This matter is being discussed in dozens of newspaper columns and TV programs every day. The Hizmet movement’s demands are about principles. These demands can be summed up as improving democratic standards and fundamental rights and freedoms, ensuring transparency and accountability in government and eliminating all tutelary influences over the general public’s will.

The Hizmet movement as a civil society or social pressure group, so to speak, is voicing its expectations of politicians, just like what other social groups are doing. These expectations, of course, do not consist of demands, normally voiced by interest groups or big corporations, such as “Award us with the contract of that tender,” “Grant us that state incentive” or “Allocate us a certain number of staff positions at that public organization,” etc. The Hizmet movement’s demands are about principles. These demands can be summed up as improving democratic standards and fundamental rights and freedoms, ensuring transparency and accountability in government and eliminating all tutelary influences over the general public’s will.

For some time, Turkey has been obsessively talking about an alleged contention between the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) and the Hizmet movement. This matter is being discussed in dozens of newspaper columns and TV programs every day. Is there really a rift or contention between the AKP and the Hizmet movement? Is the famous unspoken coalition between the AKP and Hizmet, a faith-based social movement, shattering? Is the Hizmet movement employing the powers it can to exert tutelage over the ruling AKP, just as the Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) had been doing?

First let us discuss whether these are the correct questions. I don’t think these frequently voiced questions are fair or correct. Indeed, you may or may not be aware that the Hizmet movement has always positioned itself away from politics. So far it has never established organic ties with any political party nor has it assumed animosity against one. Yet, it has opted for lending support to the policies which it believes are beneficial to the nation and country as well as to the democratization process and it has done this irrespective of who has originated those policies. And it has raised timely objections to the policies or bills which it deems harmful to the interests of the country and the nation regardless of who has formulated them. This was the case in the past and it is still so today. To claim otherwise is absurd. If you don’t believe it, you may recall how fiercely the Hizmet movement had objected to the counter-terrorism bill, drafted by the AKP during the time Cemil Çiçek served as Justice Minister.

As you’ll easily recall, the Hizmet movement has been labeled unfairly as pro-AKP until very recently because it has lent support to the policies that are favorable to the well-being of the nation such as the passing of legislation for harmonization with the European Union (EU) acquis, the combating of deep-state networks such the Ergenekon terrorist organization — a clandestine organization nested within the state trying to overthrow or manipulate the democratically elected government — as well as with the juntas embedded within the military, and the raising of the bar on fundamental rights and freedoms. Today, on the contrary, it is being marketed as anti-AKP just because it has started to criticize the ruling AKP for the slowdown in its democratization and reform efforts. And it is tagged as the enemy of the AKP as, in addition to the slowdown in the reform process, the Hizmet movement raised objections about how the government handled the Uludere tragedy — in which 34 civilians were mistaken for terrorists and killed by military air strikes in Şırnak’s Uludere district due to false intelligence — and the match-fixing bill; more recently, it opposed the ruling party’s intention to abolish or restrict specially authorized courts/prosecutors by amending Article 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CMK) although these courts/prosecutors are still needed in the fight against juntas and terrorist organizations. Yet, the Hizmet movement never blindly supported the AKP in the past nor does it oppose the AKP purposelessly today. For some reason, some people tend to overlook the fact that the Hizmet movement’s backing or opposition is always policy-based. The Hizmet movement is not against any political party and its criticisms of the ruling AKP are not targeting its very presence.

As for the second question, one can hardly assert that there was/is any coalition between the Hizmet movement, a civil society organization (CSO), and the AKP, a political party. Those who insist on such a coalition between the two dissimilar phenomena are mixing apples with oranges. Furthermore, if there were a coalition between the two groups, shouldn’t we expect a bargain or a deal between them? Is there any concrete evidence as to the existence of such a bargain or deal between the Hizmet movement and the AKP about any matter? Moreover, a coalition also implies that the power is shared between coalition partners. As far as I know, all of the Cabinet members are from the AKP. Is there any minister whom we can pinpoint as affiliated with or close to the Hizmet movement? All the more, why should a ruling party share its political power with a CSO? I don’t think there is anyone who can give a reasonable answer to this question. In other words, there is not a trace of concrete evidence that the Hizmet movement has established a coalition with the AKP or that the political party is intending to share its political power with this CSO. What do have instead? A flurry of nonsensical claims, unfounded accusations, unfair smears, delirious hallucinations and frantic black propaganda.

Well, with this in mind, you may ask, “What is really happening?” Let me answer it straight: The Hizmet movement as a civil society or social pressure group, so to speak, is voicing its expectations of politicians, just like what other social groups are doing. These expectations, of course, do not consist of demands, normally voiced by interest groups or big corporations, such as “Award us with the contract of that tender,” “Grant us that state incentive” or “Allocate us a certain number of staff positions at that public organization,” etc. As I said above, the Hizmet movement’s demands are about principles. These demands can be summed up as improving democratic standards and fundamental rights and freedoms, ensuring transparency and accountability in government and eliminating all tutelary influences over the general public’s will.

There is nothing more natural for a civil society movement than making such demands of a political party ruling the country on behalf of the social groups it represents. It is nonsensical to accuse this civil society movement unfairly and falsely of exerting tutelage over the ruling party just because it makes these demands or criticizes some policies, practices or tendencies it deems wrong. Social groups who have voted for the AKP to support its efforts to boost the country’s democratization and expand the civilian sphere and transparency in public administration are today voicing some constructive and well-meaning criticisms of the AKP out of their concern for its tendency to deviate from these targets. Don’t they have this most natural democratic right?

You may or may not be aware that the Hizmet movement has always positioned itself away from politics. So far it has never established organic ties with any political party nor has it assumed animosity against one. Yet, it has opted for lending support to the policies which it believes are beneficial to the nation and country as well as to the democratization process and it has done this irrespective of who has originated those policies. And it has raised timely objections to the policies or bills which it deems harmful to the interests of the country and the nation regardless of who has formulated them.

Is it that what some segments that make a point of reinforcing their organic ties to the AKP as part of a deal to share the party’s political and economic power understand from democracy is “vote for this party and do not meddle with the rest”?  Are they telling us, “We only need your votes, not your opinions”? There is something these groups whose quest for wealth and power overshadows their love of homeland forget: In an advanced democracy and pluralistic civil society, there will be those who like the government’s policies and those who don’t like them. These criticisms may come not only from those groups who are totally against the ruling party, but also from those groups who vote for that party but who don’t like the deviations from its targets.

It is our wish that the AKP should harken, as it did in the past, to these fair criticisms and concerns raised by these social groups on which its political power has been built for the last 10 years. And it should take into consideration these criticisms and refrain from policies, practices, and tendencies that upset its voters. What will happen if it does not? Whatever happens in a true democracy will happen. That is, they will get whatever they deserve in the first election.

Source: Today’s Zaman http://www.todayszaman.com/columnist-283534-a-rift-between-the-hizmet-movement-and-the-akp.html


Related News

Has Turkey arrested Christian to exchange for Fethullah Gülen?

Turkey’s Erdogan regime has arrested an American pastor whom they could use in a possible exchange for the Turkish Muslim cleric they want to extradite from the United States. The Muslim Fethullah Gülen is accused by the Erdogan regime to be the mastermind behind the latest failed-military-coup intending to depose the president.

Closer look at empire of cleric accused in Turkey coup attempt

Turkey’s crackdown of those suspected in the failed July 15 military coup widens, with the firing of 492 people at its top Islamic authority. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is zeroing in on a Muslim cleric living in rural Pennsylvania, whom he accuses of masterminding the coup attempt.

Erdoğan’s dream: Seizing Gülen’s network

Once Erdogan declares the Gülen movement as national security threat, he will try to confiscate all schools, dormitories, foundations, institutions and universities associated with the Gülen movement and hand them over to his supporters to run a giant institution of networks to create “religious generations.”

Turkey’s purges are hitting its business class

It is not clear when the government will begin auctioning off seized firms. The risk is that the economy may gradually come to resemble Russia’s, where political loyalty is the price for keeping a slice of the pie. “It is like watching a piece of snow roll down a mountain,” says a veteran civil servant ousted in one of the purges. “You think it won’t hit you, until you realise it’s becoming an avalanche.”

Minister Şahin praises Journalists and Writers Foundation for courageous coverage

SEZAİ KALAYCI, NEW YORK Family and Social Policy Minister Fatma Şahin has praised the Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) for its members’ courageous coverage of important issues at a time when the country is taking steps for democratization. Şahin’s remarks came during a panel discussion on women’s issues held by the GYV and Peace Islands […]

Erdoğan’s ‘enemies’ find sanctuary in Greece

“Until May 9th, the police in my home country [Turkey] tortured me,” he said. “On May 10th, the Greek police brought my children breakfast.”

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Colours of the World; IFLC Pakistan grand finale

A Cry of the Heart for the Victims of Hurricane Katrina

Indialogue Internship Program 2017 has been a great success

Islamic scholar Gülen calls for ‘reasonability’ in prep school row

An Armenian from Turkey in Los Angeles (2)

OIC head says he has always endorsed Turkish schools abroad

Turkey’s president is using the failed coup as an excuse to snuff out secular democracy

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News