Gülen makes application to top court over slanderous report


Date posted: May 21, 2014

ANKARA

Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen has made an individual application to the Constitutional Court for the removal of a slanderous report from a news portal on the grounds that the report violates his personal rights.The application was made by the scholar’s lawyer, Nurullah Albayrak.

The news report, published by www.medyagundem.com on March 25, claims that Gülen and some members of the faith-based Hizmet movement, which is inspired by Gülen, are threatening people with videos featuring those people having extramarital affairs. The report also refers to Hizmet members as Hashishin, a shadowy group that carried out politically motivated assassinations in the past. This reference to the Hizmet movement was first used by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in mid-January.

According to Albayrak, the report violates Gülen’s personal rights, incites people to hatred and enmity and violates the principle of presumption of innocence, which is enshrined in Article 38 of the Constitution.

Gülen’s lawyer initially applied to an Ankara court of peace to order the removal of the slanderous report. The court, however, said it would not, arguing that the report’s publication was within the scope of press freedom. The lawyer later applied to a court of first instance in Ankara to have the report removed. This court also turned down Albayrak’s application.

Albayrak then applied to the Constitutional Court on behalf of Gülen, arguing that they had exhausted all domestic procedures. “The report accuses my client of orchestrating an ‘operation’ against Turkey from abroad, even though there is no ongoing investigation into Gülen to this end. Claims included in the report violate Gülen’s individual rights, which are guaranteed by the Constitution. They also violate the principle of presumption of innocence,” the lawyer stated in his petition.

The lawyer also noted that a lower court’s decision that the slanderous report is protected by freedom of the press is not correct.

The report is only one example of a growing campaign of slander against Gülen. The scholar, who has inspired a worldwide religious network that defends peaceful coexistence through dialogue and education, is currently being targeted in a large-scale smear campaign, which is sponsored by the Turkish government.

Media organs close to the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government have been publishing stories stating that the scholar and his movement are part of a clandestine organization seeking to overthrow the government. Prime Minister Erdoğan and some officials from his government have raised similar claims and even insulted Gülen and the Hizmet movement. On various occasions the prime minister has called Gülen a “false prophet,” “fake saint” and “bogus scholar.” He has called the Hizmet movement a “parallel state,” “gang,” “illegal organization” and “raving Hashashins.”

A criminal investigation was launched into Gülen in late April. The investigation is based on allegations and news reports that the scholar attempted to overthrow the government, without facts or evidence. The investigation came shortly after Prime Minister Erdoğan publicly said that a formal process would be launched to make the US extradite Gülen. The scholar is in self-imposed exile in the US, though there is no legal hurdle preventing him from returning to Turkey.

The investigation into Gülen was initiated following a complaint filed by a former noncommissioned officer identified as C.O. The officer told the media in early May that his complaint against the scholar was based on a number of reports that had appeared in government newspapers. “I am basing my complaint on newspaper reports and my thoughts. I am unhappy. I do not want to be promoted in the media or become popular. I do not like things like this. I have also filed many criminal complaints against the prime minister,” he said.

Prosecutors have so far failed to take action on C.O.’s complaints against the prime minister.

Source: Todays Zaman , May 21, 2014


Related News

Islamist vs. Islamic

The followers of Gülen have opted to vote for and support various center parties freely. Moreover, their support has never amounted to partisanship. Rather, they have tended to back specific policies and the political parties that placed greater emphasis on democratization, demilitarization, transparency, accountability, fundamental rights and freedoms and economic stability.

Misrepresentation of Fethullah Gülen in English-language media

The language in general and the way certain politically significant words are used in some of this media coverage are somewhat problematic in the sense that they fail to present the full picture about Gülen, if not deliberately create doubts and prejudices about him.

Parents: Pak-Turk institutions’ control should not be transferred

Pak-Turk International’s Parents and Teachers Association (PTA) on Tuesday stressed against transferring the institutions’ control to other organisations as it will affect the future of its 1500 teachers’ future along with 10,000 students enrolled in 28 schools, colleges. The spokesman urged that if the government found any one from these schools involved in illegal practices, it should take strict action against him.

Gulen, Erdogan and democracy in Turkey

Previously, most observers had wrongly assumed that these groups were inherent allies because of their faith-based worldview. In sharp contrast to this misperception, these groups came from entirely different pasts and political orientation, although they share a common interest in free market economy and cherished upward socio-economic mobility.

INTERPOL and U.S. reject baseless charges against US-based Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen

INTERPOL apparently indicated in its decision that it did not recognize the “parallel structure” as a illegal or terrorist organization. In other words, the charges against Gülen appear to have been fabricated based on his political activity. His case is widely viewed as part of a government crackdown on dissidents and political opposition, as described here. U.S. officials have also thus far refused to extradite Gülen back to Turkey.

Why is the Hizmet community alone?

Some people I have talked to recently have started to ask the following question, which is also discussed on social media from time to time: Why is the Hizmet community still alone even though it is clearly on the right track?

Latest News

Sacramento leaders gather for Iftar dinner in celebration of Ramadan

SEO Skill Suite: Tools for Keyword Research, Technical & Backlink Analysis

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

In Case You Missed It

Indian scholar: Fethullah Gülen a great blessing for Turkey, World

Supporters of Saylorsburg Muslim cleric say protesters have got it all wrong

Erdoğan’s African mission and dismantling Turkish schools

Turkish school honored with state medal in Laos

WikiLeaks reveals emails from the son-in-law of President Erdogan, ‘proving his connection to ISIS operation smuggling oil into Turkey’

Reaction mounts against PM’s witch-hunt remarks

We must have more empathy for people fleeing for their lives around the world

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News