Gülen makes application to top court over slanderous report


Date posted: May 21, 2014

ANKARA

Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen has made an individual application to the Constitutional Court for the removal of a slanderous report from a news portal on the grounds that the report violates his personal rights.The application was made by the scholar’s lawyer, Nurullah Albayrak.

The news report, published by www.medyagundem.com on March 25, claims that Gülen and some members of the faith-based Hizmet movement, which is inspired by Gülen, are threatening people with videos featuring those people having extramarital affairs. The report also refers to Hizmet members as Hashishin, a shadowy group that carried out politically motivated assassinations in the past. This reference to the Hizmet movement was first used by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in mid-January.

According to Albayrak, the report violates Gülen’s personal rights, incites people to hatred and enmity and violates the principle of presumption of innocence, which is enshrined in Article 38 of the Constitution.

Gülen’s lawyer initially applied to an Ankara court of peace to order the removal of the slanderous report. The court, however, said it would not, arguing that the report’s publication was within the scope of press freedom. The lawyer later applied to a court of first instance in Ankara to have the report removed. This court also turned down Albayrak’s application.

Albayrak then applied to the Constitutional Court on behalf of Gülen, arguing that they had exhausted all domestic procedures. “The report accuses my client of orchestrating an ‘operation’ against Turkey from abroad, even though there is no ongoing investigation into Gülen to this end. Claims included in the report violate Gülen’s individual rights, which are guaranteed by the Constitution. They also violate the principle of presumption of innocence,” the lawyer stated in his petition.

The lawyer also noted that a lower court’s decision that the slanderous report is protected by freedom of the press is not correct.

The report is only one example of a growing campaign of slander against Gülen. The scholar, who has inspired a worldwide religious network that defends peaceful coexistence through dialogue and education, is currently being targeted in a large-scale smear campaign, which is sponsored by the Turkish government.

Media organs close to the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government have been publishing stories stating that the scholar and his movement are part of a clandestine organization seeking to overthrow the government. Prime Minister Erdoğan and some officials from his government have raised similar claims and even insulted Gülen and the Hizmet movement. On various occasions the prime minister has called Gülen a “false prophet,” “fake saint” and “bogus scholar.” He has called the Hizmet movement a “parallel state,” “gang,” “illegal organization” and “raving Hashashins.”

A criminal investigation was launched into Gülen in late April. The investigation is based on allegations and news reports that the scholar attempted to overthrow the government, without facts or evidence. The investigation came shortly after Prime Minister Erdoğan publicly said that a formal process would be launched to make the US extradite Gülen. The scholar is in self-imposed exile in the US, though there is no legal hurdle preventing him from returning to Turkey.

The investigation into Gülen was initiated following a complaint filed by a former noncommissioned officer identified as C.O. The officer told the media in early May that his complaint against the scholar was based on a number of reports that had appeared in government newspapers. “I am basing my complaint on newspaper reports and my thoughts. I am unhappy. I do not want to be promoted in the media or become popular. I do not like things like this. I have also filed many criminal complaints against the prime minister,” he said.

Prosecutors have so far failed to take action on C.O.’s complaints against the prime minister.

Source: Todays Zaman , May 21, 2014


Related News

Review of Dogan Koc’s Strategic Defamation of Fethullah Gulen: English vs. Turkish

Dogan Koc explores the identity of people who lead defamation campaigns around the globe. One of the striking observations is that over half of these libelous articles were produced by the same group of people.

PM Erdoğan also slammed me for my questions on Uludere, says journalist

Ahmet Dönmez, a leading correspondent based in Ankara with the Zaman daily who was sharply rebuked by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan after asking him a question about recent allegations of corruption during a press conference on Feb. 12 and who was proclaimed both a national hero and a traitor on social media outlets shortly thereafter, says that he was also reproached by Erdoğan once before and that this is indicative of the state of journalism in Turkey.

The Encyclopedia of Islam and hate speech

Erdoğan’s obvious target was Fethullah Gülen, but it is clear that he also attacked anyone who doesn’t think like him with phrases such as “false prophets,” “fake mystics” and “so-called scholars.” This denigration is problematic especially in terms of secularism. Indeed, the prime minister hurls gross insults at religious interpretations that diverge from his own. In his capacity as a prime minister, he imposes his beliefs and acts onto those who do not think like him. One step beyond these remarks would be the prime minister’s supporters’ resorting to violence against those he places on the bull’s eye.

The term ‘Fetö’ is a misnomer, a bizarre creation of the paranoid Erdoğan propaganda machine

It disturbed me to see your newspaper uncritically using the term ‘Fetö’ – standing for the so-called ‘Fethullah Gülen Terrorist Organisation’, which is a rather bizarre creation of the paranoid Erdoğan propaganda machine. It is true that, with most dissenting voices silenced and most of the opposition press closed, Erdoğan’s propaganda now reigns supreme in Turkey.

Hate speech and its impact on the movement (1)

It amounts to the otherization of a social group, cowing it into submission. It is a weapon used by the powerful to destroy the “others.” Hate speech is particularly dangerous when employed by those who exercise public authority as it leads to official discrimination. In a democratic country, it is one of the state’s basic duties to prevent the use of hate speech.

Turkey’s largest religious publication group denied spot at Ramadan book fair

Turkey’s Directorate of Religious Affairs has refused to allocate an exhibit space at a Ramadan book fair to the country’s largest religious publication group over its affiliation with the Gülen movement.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Dozen people hold demonstration in front of Zaman to protest corruption coverage

Turkey: Inspiring or insidious

Ex-President Demirel known for his support of Turkish schools abroad

Hate Crime: Lists of “Gulen pupils” circulating in Amsterdam

Fethullah Gulen’s Maxim: Live So That Others May Live

Why is the Turkish PM Erdoğan having difficulty?

Cultural diaspora

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News