Erdoğan’s imaginary power struggles

İhsan Yılmaz
İhsan Yılmaz

Date posted: December 25, 2013


When we look at international media coverage of the recent corruption scandal in Turkey, we see that the events are generally seen as a “power struggle” between the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government and the Hizmet movement.

While there is an undeniable tension between the two, it is reductionist to frame events in this way, blocking us from a fuller and more sophisticated picture.

It is regrettable that nobody believes there might be a few good men in the judiciary and police who are just doing the jobs the nation pays them to do. Perhaps this is just an ordinary corruption case in a country where corruption and bribery are known to be very common. Accepting the “power struggle” argument may also mean siding with the AKP government, as Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s government has been making the same argument. If you listen to Erdoğan, you will know his argument that the corruption case is not the result of a legitimate judicial investigation but a conspiracy organized by a gang, i.e., the Hizmet movement, nested within the judiciary and the police. According to the government-controlled newspapers, these people are also spies cooperating with the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Israeli MOSSAD.

Thus, the media should approach the “power struggle” theory with extra vigilance and care. On studying Erdoğan’s speeches after the corruption scandal broke out, we see that the Hizmet movement is not his only target. His bag of tricks is full of the “usual suspects” that he wants the Turkish people to despise. In other words, he is claiming not only that the Hizmet movement is engaged in a power struggle with his party, but that several others are as well. We have witnessed this before, most recently during the Gezi Park protests. Whenever he is in trouble, the prime minister blames shadowy forces without a shred of evidence. During and after Gezi, he and his loyal men boasted of concrete evidence proving their allegations, saying that this proof would be produced soon.

But, so far, we have not been presented with any evidence. In fact, the only evidence the Gezi prosecutor included in his indictment to “prove” a global conspiracy was the international media coverage, for example from CNN and the BBC, of the protests. Sedat Ergin, a columnist with the Hurriyet newspaper, made a list of Erdoğan’s “usual suspects” during the breaking out of the corruption scandal. Ergin prepared this list by analyzing Erdoğan’s most recent speeches. Here are the dark forces behind the corruption case conspiracy against Erdoğan’s government: A. The US; B. the so-called “Jewish lobby”; C. Gangs and the mafia; D. Gezi protesters; E. the Turkish media; F. the foreign media; G. Turkish business tycoons (TÜSİAD); H. the “interest rate lobby”; I. the “blood lobby” (those who are against the Kurdish negotiations); J. the opposition parties; and K. the Hizmet movement. He, of course, does not have any evidence but hopes that his voters will swallow these fabrications.

That is why he continues to claim that people will answer for all these conspiracies at the ballot box. He even likened newspaper headlines to bullets that threaten the “national will” represented in Parliament, meaning of course, his party and not the opposition. A close reading suggests that the judiciary and media are not needed to settle political scandals and accusations, since these will be settled in the elections. Erdoğan was challenged by the Hizmet movement’s Journalists and Writers Foundation (GYV) last summer to produce his evidence about the media, judiciary and bureaucrats who are alleged to receive orders from the Hizmet movement. So far, he has only been trying to undermine the movement’s credibility, as it has refused to be an uncritical supporter. In what seems to be a well-planned psychological warfare campaign, he is merely repeating accusations made by the Kemalist oligarchy, which opened a case against Fethullah Gülen in the 1990s on these grounds. But still they could not prove anything, despite the fact that they controlled the judiciary completely.

Source: Today's Zaman , December 25, 2013

Related News

Legal action against Gülen in the US: A golden opportunity for Gülen

No one will be able to say members of the movement are complaining about Erdoğan in the US. They will defend themselves against Erdoğan’s attorneys who are paid millions of dollars. Thus, Erdoğan has placed a red carpet in front of the movement. The rest is up to how the movement performs…

Bipartisan think-tank: The U.S. should not interfere politically in Gülen extradition case

If the executive branch were to interfere too forcefully in the Gülen extradition case now, it would only confirm Turkish leaders’ belief that the U.S. system operates on the same corrupt terms as Turkey’s. This would fundamentally affirm Erdoğan’s view that democracy as a value and a practice is a purely cynical discourse used by Western powers to harm Turkey.

Sarıgül’s first election promise: to protect İstanbul’s historic skyline

When asked to address claims that he is supported by the Hizmet movement led by Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen, Sarıgül said he is at peace with all segments of society and that he would be grateful for the support of anyone who gives it.

Operation and crossroads: Hizmet movement falsely accused

The delicate position in which the government now finds itself is real, but it is also a fact that the Hizmet movement is being falsely accused.
Those who support the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) and are affiliated with the Hizmet movement do not deserve such an outcome.

Hizmetophobia: A by-product of the Turkish Muslim Spring

Hizmetophobia, as a version of Islamophobia, is wrong. I call on all Hizmet critics in Turkey and abroad to refrain altogether from negatively stereotyping a widespread civic movement without presenting credible evidence other than conspiracy theories, gossip and personal fears.

Kerry Tells Turkish Foreign Minister Coup Accusations Irresponsible

Secretary of State John Kerry said Sunday he told Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu that it was irresponsible for his country to accuse the U.S. of involvement in Friday’s coup attempt.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Where is Turkey going? (2)

Ethiopian President receives Ethio-Turkish schools delegation

Unimpressed by Turkish ‘parallel structure’ defense, MEPs approve critical report

Peshawar High Court halts government order to deport Pak-Turk school staff

The last refuge of losers: deporting a journalist

Hot meals for 3 million Syrians from Kimse Yok Mu

Toward an Islamic enlightenment

Copyright 2023 Hizmet News