Turkish Islam and Fethullah Gulen


Date posted: January 30, 2004

ŞAHİN ALPAY

Many studies concerning Fethullah Gulen, the Turkish religious leader scholar and his movement have been published. The book published by Syracuse University in the United States last month is, however, the most important academic study so far. The book entitled “Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gulen Movement” is edited by John L. Esposito and M. Hakan Yavuz. Editor-in-chief of the “Modern Islam World Encyclopedia” published by the Oxford University, and a faculty member of the Georgetown University, Esposito is a well known social scientist who is distinguished with his opposition to the Orientalist tradition in his approach towards Islam and the Islamic world. There probably is no one interested in the subjects of religion, politics, Islam and Islamism who has not read any one of Esposito’s works. Hakan Yavuz, on the other hand, is a professor at the University of Utah, who at his young age has distinguished himself as one of the leading names in his field. His “Islamic Political Identity in Turkey” was published last year by the Oxford University Press. (See my review in Zaman, November 8, 2003.)

“Turkish Islam and the Secular State: The Gulen Movement” starts with the introduction written jointly by Yavuz and Esposito, and ends with a general assessment of the book by John O. Voll, another American social scientist as well known as Esposito in the field of studies on religion. The contributions by Turkish and Western social scientists mainly focus on the different aspects of Gulen and his movement. One of the most interesting articles is the one written by Ahmet T. Kuru, who is writing his doctoral thesis at the University of Washington in Seattle. In the article entitled “Fethullah Gulen’s Search For a Middle Way: Between Modernity and Muslim Tradition”, Kuru analyses Gulen’s thoughts on the relationship between four features of modernity and four aspects of the Muslim tradition: modern science and Islamic knowledge, reason and revelation, the idea of progress and conservation of tradition, and free will and destiny. Kuru concludes that Gulen has brought a dynamic interpretation to Islam, which is compatible with both tradition and modernity, but at the same time approaches both of them critically.

Hakan Yavuz’s article entitled, ‘The Gulen Movement: The Turkish Puritans,” which deals with the evolution of Gulen and his movement, is especially significant because of its critical approach to the movement. According to Yavuz: The Gulen movement appeared on the scene as a “religious-conservative community” between the years 1970 and 1983. Between 1983 and 1997, it turned into a “market – friendly religio – educational movement”, and after 1997 it abandoned its former “nationalist and statist” attitude to adopt “a more liberal and global” one. The Gulen movement while influencing Turkish society strongly on one hand, was itself deeply influenced by social change the country went through.

The virtue of the contribution by Ihsan Yilmaz, a lecturer at the University of London, entitled “Ijtihad and Tajdid by Conduct: The Gulen Movement” lies in its emphasis on the new path opened in the Islamic thought by Gulen’s interpretation, and its significance for the entire Islamic world. This article examines the role Gulen and his movement have played in moderating polarizations and eliminating radical tendencies in Turkish politics, and especially in the evolution of the Turkish Islamist movement towards adopting principles of secularism (in the meaning of separation of state and religion) and democracy.

Undoubtedly, this book will not constitute the last word on Gulen and his movement. It is, however, an extremely valuable study in terms of explaining from where did this movement start and where it has arrived, the main features of the interpretation of Islam it has developed which responds to the necessities of the modernizing, democratizing and globalizing Turkish society (and the world at large), and also why this interpretation appeals to millions of people. I sincerely hope that it will be translated into Turkish as soon as possible.

Source: Today's Zaman , January 30, 2004


Related News

Fethullah Gulen: I consider the coup attempt as a serious “terror coup”

The events of that night [the coup attempt] could be called as a serious terror coup. I categorically reject such accusations. The claim that I convinced the 8th biggest army in the world from 6000 miles away against its own government is an incredible slander. I would like those who are responsible for this coup attempt, regardless of their identities, to receive the punishment they deserve after a fair trial.

Fethullah Gülen writes for Politico Europe: Muslims have a unique responsibility in fighting terror

From its founding amid the ashes of Al Qaeda in Iraq, ISIS has dealt in deception as well as death. Despite its name, ISIS represents a perversion of Islam. The group’s dress, flags and slogans cannot hide their abhorrent betrayal of the spirit of this major world faith. Denying this barbaric group a geographical base that emboldens them to claim statehood is a worthwhile goal that all Muslims should support.

India must understand Erdogan’s ideological motives for seeking extradition of Gülenists

Since its inception in India, Hizmet is known for its peace activism, interfaith dialogue and counter-extremism. Operating in the country through interfaith dialogue centres, educational institutions and cultural associations, it is articulating an evolving narrative of peace, pluralism and non-violence based on the spiritual ideas and principles of Gülen’s progressive and dialogic narrative of Sufism, as this research paper also elaborates.

Erdoğan raising new army of political Islamists

Gülen had to take a stand, not seeking power for himself at his advanced age, but to protect the fundamental teachings of Islam that emphasize humility, moderation, justice, accountability and transparency in governance.

The term ‘Fetö’ is a misnomer, a bizarre creation of the paranoid Erdoğan propaganda machine

It disturbed me to see your newspaper uncritically using the term ‘Fetö’ – standing for the so-called ‘Fethullah Gülen Terrorist Organisation’, which is a rather bizarre creation of the paranoid Erdoğan propaganda machine. It is true that, with most dissenting voices silenced and most of the opposition press closed, Erdoğan’s propaganda now reigns supreme in Turkey.

Turkish ambassador leads an unrealistic mission: bringing a reclusive Muslim cleric before Turkish courts

Although Turkey immediately blamed Gulen for the coup attempt, it took Ankara nearly six weeks to make a formal request for his extradition — and that was based on earlier alleged crimes, not for his supposed role in the coup.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Somali students say Turkey feels like home

Turkey seizes billions of dollars worth 691 companies over alleged ties to Gülen movement

Japanese journalists express concern over Turkish gov’t pressure on critical media

Toward a culture of coexistence

Syrian refugees – Losing Touch With Humanity in Times of War

Parents of Nigerian-Turkish International College students decry call to close schools

Main opposition deputy head slams gov’t for targeting Hizmet Movement

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News