An interesting debate in the European Parliament


Date posted: February 14, 2014

BERİL DEDEOĞLU

The European Union is already preparing its progress report on Turkey, an annual ritual the European Commission (EC) must perform for all candidate countries. It is not hard to guess the tone of this year’s report.

However, those who are writing it probably face more difficulties than in previous years. They almost certainly can’t understand easily, as none of us do, what is going on right now in Turkey. Is Turkey going through a struggle for democracy, or is this just a classic power struggle, or even a battle between old and new Turkey? They probably wonder where the “deep state” has gone, as everybody talks only about the “parallel state” nowadays.

A recent debate on all this took place in the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the European Parliament (EP). While the parliamentarians were discussing their Turkey report, which will constitute the basis of the EC’s progress report, a German liberal member of the EP said it would be useful if representatives of the Hizmet movement would brief them. He has probably thought that both sides of the current fierce political debate in Turkey must be heard to better understand what is at stake in the country.

Nevertheless, the EP rapporteur for Turkey, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, a Dutch Christian Democrat, was opposed to the idea, saying the EP’s interlocutor is none other than the Turkish government. By the way, we have to remember that Europe’s Christian Democrats are generally opposed to Turkey’s accession to the EU. The exchange between the parliamentarian and the rapporteur was a little bit odd, to say the least. The EP, unlike other European institutions, is very close to the citizens as it is an elected body. That’s why European parliamentarians don’t represent their governments, but their electors. Moreover, the EP has always contacted different representatives from all countries, and it has always invited people to hear their points of view on particular subjects. These contacts are the best way to get information, or to do lobbying. Parliaments are the most suitable platform for this kind of communication.

It is not easy to understand why the rapporteur doesn’t want to contact anyone but the government while writing her report. In any case, the EP will issue its report without any external influence; the Turkish government will take note of it, and it is up to the government to take it seriously or to reject its conclusions. Besides, these reports don’t only address the government, as Turkey is not just the Turkish government.

Perhaps the rapporteur didn’t want to make the government angrier, when we are about to open the 23rd and 24th chapters of the negotiation process. Despite her “good will,” there is no doubt that her report will be full of criticism about the government’s attitude over the past year.

The Turkish government often says the EU’s reports on Turkey are one-sided and that they don’t sufficiently reflect positive developments. The EU responds that their reports are fair as democratization is indeed slowing down in Turkey. Maybe the government wasn’t so wrong, after all.

It is known that European parliamentarians already talk to people close to Hizmet, so this refusal was interesting. It can even give the impression that the Turkish government is putting pressure on the EP. Of course, Turkey hasn’t that kind of power; if we did, we would have become an EU member years ago. The other impression is that the Hizmet movement is trying to influence the EP’s work.

In fact, anybody can try to contact the EP; parliaments exist for that reason. Besides, lobbying is not an illegal activity. However, this particular debate and its reporting in the press were probably not a simple coincidence. Are some members of the EP trying to play a role in Turkey’s domestic political struggles? Let’s hope their report will not be influenced by their ambitions.

Source: Todays Zaman , February 14, 2014


Related News

Gülen movement acted ‘courageously’ when gov’t-involved graft revealed, Altan says

Ahmet Altan, the former editor-in-chief of the Taraf daily, has said that the Gülen movement acted “courageously” during the public revelations of the Dec. 17, 2013 corruption scandal that implicated several senior members of the Justice and Development Party (AK Party) government.

Istanbul police display hundreds of books among evidence of ‘terror’

Police seized Gülen’s 1,500 books; 24 CDs featuring Gülen’s speeches; TL 435,200 ($148,000) along with $99,200 and 700 euros; several laptops; two guns and some digital data, during operations targeting the alleged terrorist network of the movement.

Fethullah Gülen and the role of nonviolence in a time of terror

Fethullah Gülen is unusual in adding a distinctly Islamic voice to the calls for a non-violent approach to conflict resolution. But how well do Gülen’s teachings on non-violence lead to peaceful transformation on the ground? Is his a static and passive approach bounded by dogma, or are we witnessing an innovative, active and self-aware spirit of transformation which really can lead to a new way of defining Islam in action?

Turkish refugee in Spain: “If I go back to Turkey, I’ll be arrested and tortured”

Mustafa remembers with infinite gratitude the response of the Spanish officer: “You are welcome,” he said with a smile. Mustafa’s wife felt the knot in her stomach ease. She had been filled with doubts about the journey: “What if they don’t accept us? What if they send us to Turkey? Was it not better to stay in Bogotá?” Mustafa was nervous too, although he tried not to show it.

Vocational training center for the women in Albany

By the help of this center [Kimse Yok Mu, Hizmet’s Relief organization vocational training center ] numerous women including many widows in Albany will have professions. Training in twenty different professions will be offered at the center, which consists of workshops and sales rooms. Trainees will get economical benefits through sold items at the center that aimed to reintegrate women into the society.

Self-exiled Islamic scholar Gülen rejects Khomeini analogy for potential return to Turkey

I am not Iranian, how can I be like Khomeini? Nor have I ever had the pretensions that Khomeini had. I’m the child of my own country. If one day I return to Turkey, I will be the same as I’ve always been,” the U.S.-based Gülen said in a video-recorded message on March 5.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Erdoğan’s dream: Seizing Gülen’s network

Gülen’s lawyer denies allegation of plot against Erdoğan’s daughter, calls it ’immoral slander’

Hizmet movement applauded at friendship dinner in Italy

Turkish festival brings students from 27 countries to Ethiopia

PA State Rep. Margo Davidson reflects on her visit to Turkish refugees in Greece

Turkish Colleges wins mathematics, science awards

Turkish Cultural Center Vermont opened it doors at a ceremony held in Burlington

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News