Members of US Congress withstand intense pressure over press freedom letter

President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan meets with US Secretary of State John Kerry (L) at the Çankaya presidential palace on Sept. 12, 2014. (Photo: Reuters)
President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan meets with US Secretary of State John Kerry (L) at the Çankaya presidential palace on Sept. 12, 2014. (Photo: Reuters)


Date posted: March 10, 2015

MAHIR ZEYNALOV / WASHINGTON

Members of the US Congress who submitted a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry last month on the dismal state of media freedom in Turkey are standing firm behind their signatures despite intense pressure from the Turkish government and the pro-government media.

A number of US Congressmen and their staffers defied mounting pressure from Turkish politicians over the letter, in which they urged Kerry to raise his voice against the worsening media freedom in Turkey, a key US ally. Some members of Congress dismissed criticism over the letter and said they do not regret putting their signature below a letter that highlights how media freedom in Turkey has taken a wrong turn with the government’s media crackdown and the jailing of journalists.

Last week the Turkish authorities arrested a prominent critic of the government in Turkey, journalist Mehmet Baransu, who had published a number of exposés in the past that embarrassed both the government and the once-powerful military establishment. Following Baransu’s arrest, the State Department said freedom of journalists to operate independently in Turkey is one of the “ongoing concerns” Washington has with respect to Turkey.

Shortly after the letter was signed by 88 members of the US Congress — the highest number of US politicians ever to make a case about Turkey — they were targeted by the pro-government media. In one of these instances, Turkish pro-government newspaper Milat described Congressman Aaron Schock on its front page as a member of the “Jewish lobby who supported Israel’s massacres” and claimed that he was paid by the Gülen movement (also known as the Hizmet movement) for signing the letter.

“Give Money, Get Signature,” blared the pro-government Sabah daily, which is owned by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s son-in-law. The newspaper claimed that businessmen close to the Gülen movement bribed members of the US Congress and sponsored their travel to Turkey in return for the signatures. Dozens of news reports appeared in government mouthpiece papers shortly after the letter was made public, accusing the US lawmakers of having only a blithe concern for media freedom and signing the letter based on bribes and generous donations.

Days after the letter was revealed, journalists from pro-government newspapers and news agencies both in Washington, D.C., and Turkey flooded congressional staffers with emails and telephone calls, “stalking” them over the letter.

In one leaked email, a correspondent with Daily Sabah, an English-language mouthpiece of the government, sent identical emails to signatories of the letter, demanding that they make a comment as the newspaper found a “link” between them and the Gülen movement as “part of our investigative journalistic approach [sic].” The correspondent also mentioned that Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen made “radical statements” against the Vatican. Back in Turkey, Erdoğan and the pro-government media extensively attacked Gülen for visiting the late pope, John Paul II, in the Vatican and often portrayed the reclusive imam based in Pennsylvania as a pro-Christian and pro-Israeli figure – accusations that find a receptive audience back in Turkey.

Secretary Kerry is yet to respond to the letter while the State Department said most of the press freedom concerns mentioned in the letter had already been publicly voiced. The letter points to a troubling trend in Turkey regarding press freedoms and urges Kerry to speak up against the press freedom violations.

Some 10 journalists remain behind bars in Turkey, including Baransu and STV network executive Hidayet Karaca. The letter also highlights the plight of Karaca and Zaman Editor-in-Chief Ekrem Dumanlı, who was detained for a week after his newspaper was raided by police in December 2014. Reporters Without Borders ranked Turkey 149th out of 180 countries in its latest press freedom index, while Freedom House listed Turkey in the “Not Free” category in media freedoms.

While the Turkish media campaigned against members of Congress, Turkish politicians publicly and privately scolded the legislators and accused the Gülen movement of “complaining [about] Turkey to outsiders.” In one such scathing criticism, Erdoğan described members of the US Congress as “rental” people who were bribed to rally an anti-Turkey campaign.

“If Mr. Erdoğan believes that US congressmen and their staff, merely by availing themselves of fact-finding trips to Turkey, somehow rent out their views, then the president appears to be projecting onto others his own mindset and practices in relation to Turkey’s media. Within his own country, he knows how that works,” Congressman Dana Rohrabacher responded. Other congressmen or their staffers avoided a public spat yet rejected the criticisms. Some of the congressional officials said they are oblivious to media criticisms because they are aware that they are voiced in pro-government papers.

Erdoğan’s ridicule of congressmen comes at a time when state-run Turkish groups are intensifying their activities to lobby lawmakers to avoid voting for a bill that would describe the mass killings of Armenians in 1915 as genocide. Sentiment among US lawmakers against Turkey runs higher than ever as Erdoğan has ramped up his anti-US rhetoric, observers say. Sources say Turkish lobbyists already spend most of their time and energy on defaming the Gülen movement rather than debating other issues more central to Turkey’s national interests that had topped the agenda in similar meetings for years. Erdoğan made it clear that he wants to root out the Gülen movement in Turkey and abroad, launching a full-fledged campaign, either by brandishing sticks or bestowing carrots.

Turkish state-run lobbying groups have renewed their focus on elected US officials in Washington, trying to “convince” them that they “fell in a trap” set by others when they make statements that disturb Ankara.

“We are not so easily influenced in the American Congress,” Rohrabacher highlighted.

Sources say Ankara had initially decided to respond to the letter, but then the Turkish ambassador in Washington was tasked with expressing Turkey’s uneasiness over it. Last month Serdar Kılıç, Turkey’s ambassador to the US, sent a letter to all the members of Congress who had signed the letter, telling them that Ankara is “deeply concerned” about an attempt “by some” to make the US lawmakers a part of “this ill-willed initiative,” referring to a “misleading portrayal of events” in the letter signed by the congressmen.

“The [ambassador’s] letter is an outright insult to the congressmen,” one journalist observed, who has seen the content of the letter.

Congressman Alan Grayson was also troubled by the way Erdoğan and others described the lawmakers. When a leader shows such disrespect for other leaders, Grayson said, he is likely to receive disrespect in return, and the interests of his people suffer for it.

The letter to Kerry was only a small impetus to the government’s already increasing lobbying efforts in Washington against the Gülen movement. US officials in Washington, however, keep the dialogue to a minimum. Washington is rife with speculation that Turkish officials are finding it tough to secure appointments with the US administration.

Last week, Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu and two other ministers went to New York to allay concerns of foreign investors, shaken after Erdoğan continued his frequent bashing of the Central Bank of Turkey to sharply cut its interest rates to boost growth ahead of key elections slated for June 7. Sources said Davutoğlu didn’t come to Washington, D.C., because he could not secure a single appointment with US officials.

High-level US officials don’t usually meet with foreign dignitaries if they’re facing an election in the near future. It was not clear if Davutoğlu bypassed Washington for this reason. US officials usually avoid criticizing their ally publicly on security matters while they’re frequently meting out criticisms on media freedoms and civil liberties.

Source: Today's Zaman , March 10, 2015


Related News

ECtHR urges Albania not to deport Gülen follower to Turkey

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Strasbourg sent an official request to Albania asking it not to deport a Turkish citizen who is known to be a follower of the Gülen movement to Turkey as his trial has not been concluded in Albania, the Tirana Times reported.

I am afraid 2012 will not be easy

Emre Uslu, Friday January 20, 2012 When the Justice and Development Party (AKP) received 50 percent of the votes in the 2011 election and came to power by promising to make a new constitution, expectations were raised to expect a transformation of the system. But if you consider the aftermath of the elections, one cannot […]

Columnist sees Gülen ‘conspiracy’ in ruling against Israel

Presenting the Gülen movement as the architect of the court ruling may help the government deal with a possible backlash from families, the İHH — an outspoken supporter of the government’s Middle East policies — and a wider segment of its own voters who want Israeli officials to pay for the Mavi Marmara raid, in case a reconciliation deal with Israel goes into effect. Internationally, it may help the government deal with Israeli and Western criticism that it is not committed to reconciliation with Israel despite officially vowing that it is.

They busted the house of a deceased teacher to take her under custody

Parents of Didem took a grief-stricken breath when they saw the police squad holding custody document which is written Didem’s name on it and they said “If you want to take her under custody you should go to cemetery. Didem is dead, my son.”

Freedom comes with a price

Those who raise demands for democracy and transparency are being raided, arrested or smeared as a result of the government’s reliance on Nazi Germany methods of persecution and oppression.

Hizmet and March 30 elections: What happened? (I)

Erdoğan has rejected the evidence of corruption that has been substantiated or he has presented this proof as being part of a conspiracy. He promoted the idea that Israel and the US were external components of this conspiracy and that the Hizmet movement was the domestic component. Propaganda centers have worked to this end.

Latest News

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

Erdoğan’s Civil Death Project’ : The ‘politicide’ spanning more than a decade

Fethullah Gülen’s Vision and the Purpose of Hizmet

In Case You Missed It

Gülen’s lawyer denies allegation of plot against Erdoğan’s daughter, calls it ’immoral slander’

Governor’s office rejects Kimse Yok Mu’s application for aid campaign

Turkish Cultural Center Vermont gives awards at Friendship Dinner

Young Peace Ambassadors Academy 2015 Graduation Ceremony

Turkish Schools in Afghanistan organized the eighth annual science competition

German view of Hizmet Movement (2)

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News