The mosque-cemevi project and the settlement process


Date posted: September 16, 2013

ALİ ASLAN KILIÇ, ANKARA

In Muş, where I was during the final days of August for the anniversary of the Battle of Manzigert, I had the chance to speak with citizens from both Manzigert and Ağrı about the terror problem and the solution process aimed at Turkish-Kurdish peace. Last Sunday, I was in the neighborhood of Tuzluçayır in Ankara’s Mamak district to watch the groundbreaking ceremony for the cami (mosque)-cemevi (house of worship for Alevis) project. While there, I headed over to listen in person to the complaints of protesters opposing this particular project.

The general opinion I heard from people was that this problem could have been solved much more easily long ago.

Years ago, provocations could have been prevented, which would have prevented wounds from being inflamed and re-opened, over and over again. The use of the Alevi and Kurdish problems as means to weaken Turkey’s competitive power could have been prevented. The settlement process aims for peace between Kurds and Turks, while the cami-cemevi project aims for peace between Alevis and Sunnis.

Here though, the truth is that there isn’t the slightest bit of enmity between either Turks and Kurds or Sunnis and Alevis. Not even the smallest version of some of the cruel ethnic and sectarian violence experienced in the West is experienced here in Anatolia and if such enmity had existed, it would have been impossible to bring it to an end with just one process or one project.

Here, Kurds and Turks — and Alevis and Sunnis — have never seen each other as adversaries or competitors. To the contrary, they have always viewed one another as kinfolk, with marriages and blood relationships springing forth between them. They have formed trade partnerships with each other in the business world. They fought shoulder to shoulder in the Turkish War of Independence and formed the Republic together.

Despite the many negative events, attempts to provoke them and various skirmishes following the formation of the Republic, these feelings of brotherhood and friendship were not even shaken. This is because, when it came down to the people at the core of this country, there was a wider awareness of similarities in terms of the oppression they were all experiencing. The same ideology that had stolen the basic rights of the Kurds and the Alevis had also targeted the pious and the non-Muslims of the country. The appearance that this tyranny was at the hands of “Turks” and “Sunnis” elicited a general feeling of alienation among many.

The settlement process and the cami-cemevi project will bring to an end the alienation that some were hoping to create through oppression.

In concert with the announcement that the terror organization, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), would be withdrawing its armed elements, there were also some who came forward, hoping to block the progress of the cami-cemevi complex. The aims of the armed organization are quite clear — to protect its negotiating power and maintain its power over the people using fear to enter the coming election period on a strong footing. But what do those who oppose this cami-cemevi project say? They believe that Alevism is headed for assimilation. There is the worry that unity between the mosque and the cemevi will divide Alevis into two sections. They are also opposed to the fact that it was Fethullah Gülen who thought up this project, and the Hizmet movement that is supporting it.

The best answers to all these negative reactions come from leading Alevi names. Izzetitin Doğan, the head of the Cem Foundation, calls the Cami ve Cemevi Project a “project of peace and understanding,” underscoring that there is no difference in the perception of what peace is in the Islam of the Alevis and the Islam of the Sunnis. Doğan also notes that those hoping to bar the project from moving forward through protest actions can be neither proper Alevis nor Sunnis and says further that the philosophy of such people is lacking in depth.

The general opinion in and around the area of the project tends to be that other countries are trying to systematically disrupt the atmosphere of peace in Turkey. Some of the countries pointed to by people as being made uncomfortable by Turkey’s rising star when it comes to peace and stability are Germany, Iran, Israel, France, England and the US.

Source: Today's Zaman , September 15, 2013


Related News

How come a 25 days old BABY could be a THREAT to the national security?

I was told that [Turkish Consulate] may issue a 3 months temporary passport which we can only use it to get back to Turkey. To ensure that they also labeled an extra note on the passport which says can only be used to return to Turkey.

Ex-President Demirel known for his support of Turkish schools abroad

Turkey’s ninth president, Süleyman Demirel, who died on Wednesday at the age of 90, was known for his open support of the Turkish schools abroad inspired by the views of the Turkish Islamic scholar Fethullah Gülen.

8-year-old cancer patient departs to Germany for treatment without parents due to ongoing travel ban

Ahmet Burhan Ataç, an eight-year-old kid departed to Germany on Sunday for cancer treatment without his parents as the father is in prison and the mother is subject to a travel ban over alleged Gulen links.

ECtHR Asks Turkish Gov’t For Explanation Over The Case Of Abducted Lawyer

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has decided to evaluate the application of Emine Özben whose husband Mustafa Özben (42), a Bar-registered lawyer and academic, was abducted on May 9, 2017 in Ankara  by elements linked to Turkish security and intelligence services on August 4, 2017.

Erdogan: Turkey’s man of mystery armed with extra powers

Erdogan’s Islamist supporters sometimes suggest that he is on his way to declaring himself caliph. As the 100th anniversary of the caliphate’s abolition approaches, he may find this tempting; depending on whether he uses the Islamic or Christian calendar, that could happen, respectively, on March 10, 2021 or March 4, 2024. You read it here first.

Prof. Scott Alexander: Hizmet is a social movement for peace

“What I have personally observed is that Hizmet is a movement that embraces contrasts and in which everyone can find a place for themselves. It’s a globally transformational movement. It is, on the other hand, able to combine tradition and modernity and bring them around the common values. Although I might not be necessarily exercising your values, I consider myself a part of this movement. The principles that lead the movement are what lead my life as well.” Alexander remarked.

Latest News

Sacramento leaders gather for Iftar dinner in celebration of Ramadan

SEO Skill Suite: Tools for Keyword Research, Technical & Backlink Analysis

Turkish inmate jailed over alleged Gülen links dies of heart attack in prison

Message of Condemnation and Condolences for Mass Shooting at Bondi Beach, Sydney

Media executive Hidayet Karaca marks 11th year in prison over alleged links to Gülen movement

ECtHR faults Turkey for convictions of 2,420 applicants over Gülen links in follow-up to 2023 judgment

New Book Exposes Erdoğan’s “Civil Death Project” Targeting the Hizmet Movement

European Human Rights Treaty Faces Legal And Political Tests

ECtHR rejects Turkey’s appeal, clearing path for retrials in Gülen-linked cases

In Case You Missed It

13 recommendations to MGK secretary for inclusion in ‘Red Book’

Turks See Purge as Witch Hunt of ‘Medieval’ Darkness

Meal and food support for Somalian people during Ramadan

Historic ijma meeting in İstanbul

In new incursion, Turkey orchestrates rushed extraditions from Kosovo

Turkish opposition deputy: Women jailed with children are treated like enemies

Turkey- the state versus the people

Copyright 2026 Hizmet News