Recep Tayyip Erdogan is about to make himself a virtual dictator in Turkey


Date posted: January 22, 2017

Michael Daventry

As you read this, a rapid and turbulent revolution is underway in Turkey. The country’s ruling Justice and Development (AK) Party is pushing proposals through parliament that would radically alter the system of government.

By abolishing Turkey’s long-established system of collective cabinet government, the AK Party says it will stabilise the country and streamline decision-making. But the proposed law will pool power in the hands of the president and dramatically reduce the top job’s accountability to parliament. In effect, it codifies a system of one-man rule for Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.


Mr Gül keeps very quiet. Such is the extent of the crackdown following last July’s coup attempt, and the environment of fear and intimidation, that not even an ex-president is willing to speak out. Mr Gül told an audience at London’s Chatham House in November 2014. “To be able to have that sort of a presidential regime, you need to check everything. You need to have your balances in the right place.”


It wipes out the century-old role of prime minister and transfers its functions to the president. It strips Turkish MPs of their duty to scrutinise the executive and abolishes the vote of confidence needed for governments to take office. It grants the presidency new powers to directly appoint a vast range of public officials – cabinet ministers, provincial governors, and judges to the highest courts in the land.

Simply put, the government’s plans are an enabling act: they are designed to strengthen the individual over the collective. Powers and duties that are presently distributed among the prime minister, the cabinet and senior judges are being rerouted to one man.

Rushed through Parliament

The AK Party says the proposed law will equip a strong leader to generate the stability that people in Turkey crave. This month Deputy Prime Minister Mehmet Şimşek said his administration wants to abolish Turkey’s “two-headed” political model that causes paralysis if the president and prime minister ever disagree.


The proposed constitutional change grants the presidency new powers to directly appoint a vast range of public officials – cabinet ministers, provincial governors, and judges to the highest courts in the land. Simply put, the government’s plans are an enabling act: they are designed to strengthen the individual over the collective. Erdogan could squeeze out a victory in April’s referendum. That result would strip away the few powers that keep him in check. For Turkey’s massive, disenchanted minority, that result would leave no hope.


That message has a powerful appeal for a country like Turkey, which has been rocked by political turmoil, the need to care for millions of Syrian refugees, and repeated terror attacks that have killed one person on average for each day of the last 18 months. But it is difficult to argue the system is not being tailored specifically for Mr Erdoğan himself, not least because it eliminates the few remaining checks on his power.

AK Party officials have made much of their proposal’s 9th article, which makes the presidency liable for prosecution for the first time. They correctly point out Turkish presidents can only face trial on suspicion of treason and that they were proposing to make the office holder liable for any offence.

But an investigation into suspected wrongdoing would take much, much longer than before. Under the present rules, the process for MPs to investigate and topple a government minister takes 18 days. Under the AK Party’s proposals, it would take up to 10 months.

By contrast, Parliament is making great haste with the reforms, burning the midnight oil for seven nights in row last week to debate measures that would strip away their own powers. Such breakneck speed makes the proposals all the more bewildering.

A climate of intimidation

The government party is a few seats short of the 330 votes needed to put their proposals to a public referendum. The leader of the MHP, a small far-right party, has promised to provide the numbers to help them over the line. But an executive presidency for Mr Erdoğan is deeply unpopular among the MHP’s extensive grassroots network and its MPs are under immense pressure to oppose it. There have been reports of MPs being intimidated, with whips deploying tactics like man-to-man marking and videoing the voting booths to flush out any rebels among AK Party and MHP lawmakers.

That might explain why the AK Party leadership is pushing the proposals through parliament as quickly as it can. But it is not just the MHP’s grassroots that are disgruntled.

Many of Mr Erdoğan’s former comrades-in-arms – like his predecessor as president, Abdullah Gül – are opposed to an executive presidency. “Everyone knows that I see a parliamentary system as a better, more suitable system,” Mr Gül told an audience at London’s Chatham House in November 2014. “To be able to have that sort of a presidential regime, you need to check everything. You need to have your balances in the right place.”

But these days, Mr Gül keeps very quiet. Such is the extent of the crackdown following last July’s coup attempt, and the environment of fear and intimidation, that not even an ex-president is willing to speak out.

Loved by one half and loathed by the other, Mr Erdoğan is the country’s most divisive politician. He could squeeze out a victory in April’s referendum. That result would strip away the few powers that keep him in check. For Turkey’s massive, disenchanted minority, that result would leave no hope.


Michael Daventry is a Turkish journalist based in London and editor of the Turkish community newspaper Haber.

Source: The Telegraph , January 19, 2017


Related News

How Erdogan is covering up the corruption scandal

In a blunt violation of Turkish laws and ethical norms, authorities removed nearly 100 police chiefs, who were either involved in the graft raids or pose a possible risk to the government. Two additional prosecutors were appointed to supervise the case, a move mostly interpreted by experts as an attempt to control the judicial process. The government has launched an unprecedented witch-hunt in public institutions and continues to purge any bureaucrat it believes could be cooperative with prosecutors in the graft investigation. Four ministers whose names were linked to these investigations refused to step down despite calls from the opposition.

If whoever touched Gülen was doomed, we would have been ashes by now

“If whoever touches him is screwed, it should have been me who would have gotten screwed first; I should have been in ashes by now because I have published the harshest material against Gülen. I have published the most derogatory books against him.”

Wife says dismissed police chief left to die of colorectal cancer in İzmir prison

Yavuz Bölek, a former police chief who was dismissed from his job following corruption probes implicating Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has colorectal cancer and will soon be paralyzed if he is not given medical attention. His requests for treatment have been ignored.

Why is Erdoğan hostile to Turkish schools?

The Hizmet movement has had considerable successes in the field of education. While its share in the Turkish education sector is not colossal, the quality of its services stands out.

Turkey detains Mozambican software developer over links to Gülen movement

Helton Silva Malambane, a software developer from Mozambique who previously worked with the now-shut-down Fatih University, was detained by police at his residence in İstanbul over links to the Gülen movement, whose sympathizers the government accuses of masterminding a failed coup attempt on July 15. Twenty-seven-year-old Malambane was detained after police received anonymous tips about him.

Democracy is vanishing in Turkey, specialist says

Zeynalov reminded the attendees that Erdogan also was arrested a couple of decades ago. That eventually helped him to become famous and won him the elections five years later. But it didn’t stop Erdogan to use the same law for justifying the arrest of Zeynalov in 2014.

Latest News

Fethullah Gülen’s Condolence Message for South African Human Rights Defender Archbishop Desmond Tutu

Hizmet Movement Declares Core Values with Unified Voice

Ankara systematically tortures supporters of Gülen movement, Kurds, Turkey Tribunal rapporteurs say

Erdogan possessed by Pharaoh, Herod, Hitler spirits?

Devious Use of International Organizations to Persecute Dissidents Abroad: The Erdogan Case

A “Controlled Coup”: Erdogan’s Contribution to the Autocrats’ Playbook

Why is Turkey’s Erdogan persecuting the Gulen movement?

Purge-victim man sent back to prison over Gulen links despite stage 4 cancer diagnosis

University refuses admission to woman jailed over Gülen links

In Case You Missed It

Gülen movement-backed Abant Platform to discuss Alevi-Sunni ties

A Case Study In How Lobbyists For Turkish Government Manipulate The American Media on Gulen Issue

Fethullah Gulen’s Message on the Anniversary of the Coup Attempt in Turkey

Businessmen voice frustration over smear campaign against Hizmet

Erdogan pushes further to replace Gülen schools in Africa to spread his ideology

Local Muslims share Ramadan meal with each other and the community

Pro-government paper claims with photoshopped image that Gülen has Vatican passport

Copyright 2022 Hizmet News